• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Obama's People: GOP earned Donald Trump[W:90]

You can go on with your pollyanna-esque view of what's going on in the republican party but there's no question that there's a full scale war going on inside the party at the prospect of either Trump or Cruz being the nominee. What plays well to the extreme rightwing in this country (i.e., Trump AND Cruz supporters) .
Iron clad proof that you are poorly informed.
 
Actually, I like sentences, correct spacing, paragraphs...you know, those basics of effective writing.

You also like pretending you're a grammarian and that your writing is effective.
 
Iron clad proof that you are poorly informed.

While I'm sure you're an authority on being poorly informed, that makes you a rather poor judge of others' level of information. You must be one of those people on the right who under the delusion that gerrymandering majorities in rightwing states constitutes an actual majority of the country.
 
You also like pretending you're a grammarian and that your writing is effective.

Oh...I make mistakes. No doubt about that. But I do like to use sentences, correct spacing and paragraphs.
 
:waiting: for some kind of point here.

I'll try to keep it as simple as possible for obvious reasons. Complaining about spelling, grammar or style instead of responding to the content of a post is a well-known evasive maneuver on discussion boards. But doing so with no basis whatsoever for those criticisms speaks to an even bigger problem than not being able to come back on the points. This goes into the realm of not just cowardice but also dishonesty. To use a recent colloquialism (that means a word or phrase used in informal language), do you "feel" me now?

I know some of those words were "big" but I have reduced the paragraph size to the what must be within even your ability to handle.
 
I'll try to keep it as simple as possible for obvious reasons. Complaining about spelling, grammar or style instead of responding to the content of a post is a well-known evasive maneuver on discussion boards. But doing so with no basis whatsoever for those criticisms speaks to an even bigger problem than not being able to come back on the points. This goes into the realm of not just cowardice but also dishonesty. To use a recent colloquialism (that means a word or phrase used in informal language), do you "feel" me now?

I know some of those words were "big" but I have reduced the paragraph size to the what must be within even your ability to handle.

oh...shrug...

I already told you I have no desire to deal with your wall of text. If that bothers you, then you have two choices...

1. Clean up your act.

2. Suck it up and deal with the fact that I won't accept your crap.

You decide.
 
oh...shrug...

I already told you I have no desire to deal with your wall of text. If that bothers you, then you have two choices...

1. Clean up your act.

2. Suck it up and deal with the fact that I won't accept your crap.

You decide.

Now even a four line paragraph with just five sentences is a "wall of text?" Seems no limit to your need to avoid addressing the text no matter how brief and direct it is. Thanks for reinforcing my point. What you won't accept is your fact-free comments being blown to bits.
 
oh...shrug...

I already told you I have no desire to deal with your wall of text. If that bothers you, then you have two choices...

1. Clean up your act.

2. Suck it up and deal with the fact that I won't accept your crap.

You decide.
I was going back over our exchange and came to find that you were not the intended recipient of the "wall of text" to which you avoided and evaded responding. So, you obviously you had no interest in what it said and were just out to manufacture a pretext hoping to start something. In the process you made yourself look ridiculous to do it and let me kick you all over the place. You must have issues that shouldn't be dealt with on a discussion board.
 
Last edited:
Now even a four line paragraph with just five sentences is a "wall of text?" Seems no limit to your need to avoid addressing the text no matter how brief and direct it is. Thanks for reinforcing my point. What you won't accept is your fact-free comments being blown to bits.

When those five sentences is rambling blather, then yes...it's a wall of text that I won't deal with.

Clean up your act or suck it up. Your choice.
 
When those five sentences is rambling blather, then yes...it's a wall of text that I won't deal with.

Clean up your act or suck it up. Your choice.

You must have confused me with someone who would take the advice of someone like you.
 
You must have confused me with someone who would take the advice of someone like you.

sigh...

You'll talk about anything...no matter how pathetic...to avoid talking about the topic of this thread, won't you?
 
sigh...

You'll talk about anything...no matter how pathetic...to avoid talking about the topic of this thread, won't you?

Ah, the projection of the right cannot ever be suppressed. Thank jesus that part of their condition is total lack of self awareness.
 
Moderator's Warning:
Stop sniping at each other and discuss the topic. Actions may be pending for posts made before this warning.
 
Back
Top Bottom