Boo Radley
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2009
- Messages
- 37,066
- Reaction score
- 7,028
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Here's his thesis: "The point is, is that when we succeed, we succeed because of our individual initiative, but also because we do things together. There are some things, just like fighting fires, we don’t do on our own.”
Learn your history, polution did catch fire in a river. And LA is better than it was. And no, the meat industry wasn't. I know you want to convince yourself of these fanasties, but you simply don't know your history.
And yes, they are communist, and don't have the people pressing them to have helpful regulations. You missed the point.
And no, derugulation did more to cause the crisis than anything else. And companies fail from time to time, but don't let too much misinformation get inside your ideology.
Here is the far left douchenozzle from whom Obama steals his talking points:
[deleted video link]
Do other readers think that a person is losing, or has already lost, a debate when denigration without description is all they offer in response?
Do other readers think that a person is losing, or has already lost, a debate when denigration without description is all they offer in response?
Did you watch the douchenozzle in the video? Rather close to Obama's talking points.
Do other readers think that a person is losing, or has already lost, a debate when denigration without description is all they offer in response?
It's apparent you're the slave to ideology and ignorant of history. You just used China as an example of what we should fear without beneficent government, when in fact China is an example of what happens when governments control or own markets.
You are determined not to answer the question, "so what?" So no one succeeds alone. And . . . ? He brings this up, why? C'mon, Boo; show your "non-partisanship." Answer the question.
the middle-class are WAAAAAAAAAY more productive than the wealthy.
No, people do succeed because of their own intititive. And they work together to achieve things. This is the point, hence one is not enemy of the other. You do know Romney has said the same things? It has been linked often enough. I didn't fault Romney for it. But you completely ignore it, . . . you partisan. :coffeepap
And the question you continue to ignore . . .
"So what?"
Not that I need to keep pointing it out to you -- you know you're ignoring it.
Did you ask Romney so what? I'm sorry you don't like the answer, but the answer is, now read slowly . . . . One . .. is . . . not . . . the . . . enemy . . . of . . . the . . . other. It's not radical, major, significant, or even orginial. But it is also not the silliness your side wants to pretend it is.
not in terms of taxes....
the middle-class are WAAAAAAAAAY more productive than the wealthy.
Am I? What makes me partisan? Voting for Bob Dole when I did? Arguing for a divided government because when one side wins it goes to ****? Calling for compromise? Saying both sides lie? Exactly what makes me partisan?
When you ignore a fact, like a clear thesis statement, you are neither reasonable nor honest.
Of course, he did not say that. So, you have it completely wrong.
By what measure, for heaven's sake?..
Did you ask Romney so what? I'm sorry you don't like the answer, but the answer is, now read slowly . . . . One . .. is . . . not . . . the . . . enemy . . . of . . . the . . . other. It's not radical, major, significant, or even orginial. But it is also not the silliness your side wants to pretend it is.
Would that be different than your side, Boo?
Would that be different than your side, Boo?
Hey everyone! Boo says he's non-partisan! Does ANYONE believe that?
I'm not ignoring anything, you are. Your partisan bias has you making excuses for what the anointed one said.
Nope. That's what he said.
On this issue, yes. But does both sides have those who are dishonest? Sure. I've said so many times. But on this, it is your side being dishonest.
Not exactly what I said, I asked you to note what makes me partisan. We might move on from there. Having liberal points of view isn't equal to being partisan. I want to make sure you understand the difference.
You're ignoring what was actually, and factually said. I'm sorry, but you're reading your own bais in and not objectively reading his words.
Factually, you're completely wrong. Sorry. But facts are not that maluable.
Boo, everyone here knows who your side is.
No, actually what he said was "If you've got a succesful business --- you didn't build that!" He did not say "If you've got roads and bridges --- you didn't build those!" It is your side that is ignoring what he actually said. In a campaign speech, no less. Why bring it up at all....in a campaign speech?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?