ocean515
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2013
- Messages
- 36,760
- Reaction score
- 15,468
- Location
- Southern California
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Your inability to get over your hatred for Obama has made this conversation worthless and tiring. Lucky you only have 2 years left.
I don't have access to Facebook, but if anyone does Ray Lewis, a former player with the Baltimore Ravens and a resident of the city posts a very passionate and powerful condemnation of the rioters in his city and calls for them to get off the streets. This is what I was calling for from the President - this is what I call leadership.
Did he refer to the rioters as "black savages?"
Bump
Perhaps your trolling will have better luck with someone else - buh-bye.
Here is Obama stoking the flames against the cops today
Unreal. Obama SLAMS US Police After Baltimore Riots: Too Often Target Poor, African Americans (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit
Perhaps your trolling will have better luck with someone else - buh-bye.
I'm just wondering how you, as a conservative, we're even able to tell the races apart. I would assume that you would just see "looters" and "rioters," and that any further attempts to distinguish them would just lead to blurry images and confusion.
Ignorant nonsense. Go look at what I've posted about this issue in previous threads and about the officer in the shooting of the man in South Carolina. When police should be criticized, I have. Criticize me all you want but don't flat out lie - I once thought you were better than that.
Unlike liberals, we see and call out lawlessness in every race. Liberals only see lawlessness if it wears a badge or it prays in a church.
You mean, dont flat out lie like this?:
Where's a 'pot meet kettle' emoticon when ya need one?
However you want to paint it. I always love how people throw around the "hatred" meme. I don't hate the President. You should try some other meme, the "hate" BS is most certainly an accusation that is tiring and worthless.
I'm not surprised you wouldn't be able to see the difference between a poster specifically lying about another poster's comments or positions and a poster expressing an opinion about a collective ideology and their tendencies. But hey, I'm used to you bastardizing my posts to suit your own agenda, so have at it. Just don't expect me to respond beyond this one time.
When it's Obama saying "you can keep your plan" it's hate. When it's Obama playing mind games over "amnesty" its racism.
when it's "that slut Sara Palin" it's valid political commentary.
Hate is what they do, and accuse others. These are the people who never quite got around to condemning their colleagues for death threats over a hypothetical pizza. That showed their true colors, hate and more hate in the name of "progress."
I don't have access to Facebook, but if anyone does Ray Lewis, a former player with the Baltimore Ravens and a resident of the city posts a very passionate and powerful condemnation of the rioters in his city and calls for them to get off the streets. This is what I was calling for from the President - this is what I call leadership.
I'm not surprised you wouldn't be able to see the difference between a poster specifically lying about another poster's comments or positions and a poster expressing an opinion about a collective ideology and their tendencies. But hey, I'm used to you bastardizing my posts to suit your own agenda, so have at it. Just don't expect me to respond beyond this one time.
However you want to paint it. I always love how people throw around the "hatred" meme. I don't hate the President. You should try some other meme, the "hate" BS is most certainly an accusation that is tiring and worthless.
Respond or not, your extremely inaccurate opinion is a reflection on you and your credibility.
If not hatred, then what possesses you to purposefully misinterpret his message?
These efforts have been pushed by those who control them in a effort to get their followers to avoid common ground, and eliminate opposition. It's dredged from the same fetid swamp as "Deniers".
It's not enough to suggest another persons ideas are wrong, or their critique is misplaced. Calling someone a racist is meant to remove them from the population. It's an intellectually vacant effort that speaks volumes about the content of character of those who use it.
What causes you to conclude I have? You have your opinion, and I have mine.
I think I've given my reasons rather clearly and completely.
Perhaps you can oblige with a similar effort, as opposed to the tiring and worthless path you seem to want to continue on.
The president called the riots criminals, arsonists, etc. and explicitly condemned their actions. How can you listen/read the President's speech and not understand that?
I have. There's a whole part of the Presidents speech, which you ignore, wherein he explicitly condemns the rioters.
You can't get any more clear then that.
Absolutely right.
It is part of a long list of accusations that are impossible to prove otherwise, "woman hater", "homophobe',, "denier", all nice little catch labels. But then the left has aways lived on labels, and demonizing. The satanic horns on George Bush were first rolled out here against a Liberal premier.
To this day, i have at least one opportunity to put a socialist in his place in here as they hurl the label "right wing fanatic" at me for criticizing either Obama or Hillary.....
Of course a radical rightie will be out there supporting universal health care, equal rights for all, women, gays, lesbians and the works, has worked for and attended gay weddings etc.
they can't grok the idea that a liberal might see through the bull**** blind obedience to a brand, whether it is Obama or Hillary.
CJ is 100% correct..his posts are spot on to those of us who follow these issues
Can you in your heart say that that is what is expected of the "first black president"?
The same as what Bush would do?
I thought there was going to be hope and change? There's no hope for change flowing out of the office of the First Black President in history, ****ing basketball players are showing more leadership.
The president called the riots criminals, arsonists, etc. and explicitly condemned their actions. How can you listen/read the President's speech and not understand that?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?