Marilyn Monroe
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2006
- Messages
- 2,137
- Reaction score
- 304
- Location
- Tennessee
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
You mean the "blood evidence" with the preservative in it, that LAPD smeared on evidence without realizing that the preservative in the blood would show that OJ was not the person who put it there?
Don't get me wrong....OJ was guilty....but the Simpson case is a classic example of police action at its worst and what can happen as a result. OJ wasn't acquitted because of fears of a riot....he was acquitted because the LAPD created reasonable doubt.
The glove bit was turned into a circus, and the glove didn't fit because of what it had been through, and because OJ hadn't taken his arthritis meds. Tell us what was inconclusive about the DNA. Goldman's blood and DNA were all over everything.
LOL. Truth is such a hard thing for some.Um it says you lean Independent, so no I'm not talking about you. I was referring to some comments that were said about black people in this thread by southern conservatives.
Did her murder two people and have a jury decide he need not pay a price because he is black as they are?So did you feel the same about the Rodney King trial? Or he clearly deserve it because he is black.
You mean the "blood evidence" with the preservative in it, that LAPD smeared on evidence without realizing that the preservative in the blood would show that OJ was not the person who put it there?
Don't get me wrong....OJ was guilty....but the Simpson case is a classic example of police action at its worst and what can happen as a result. OJ wasn't acquitted because of fears of a riot....he was acquitted because the LAPD created reasonable doubt.
I think the blood shrunk the glove. They were probably leather, and I agree they degraded. If the gloves had his blood on them along with Nicole and Ron's, well it would still seem like he did it, pretty strongly.
I have one foot that is a half size larger than the other one. Shoes don't ordinarily fit me right because of this. One side of the body is usually different from the other.
It was LA. They would have destroyed the city, again. The judge knew it, the jury knew it. He was very guilty, and the blood evidence cynched it. Didn't need the too small glove, or the incompetent handling of the blood. His blood was in all the places, and theirs in his. Ron Goldman's blood was in his car for crissake.
Ah... so who went to jail from the LAPD for this obvious framing?
LOL.....you actually think that cops are going to prosecuted for this kind of stuff? That's a good one. Cops are caught lying all the time and judges/prosecutors simply turn their heads....ask anyone who actually works in the criminal justice system.
BTW OK.....how do you explain the preservative that was found in the blood on the sock that Mark Fuhrman supposedly found?
So no one was prosecuted, not even some damning articles in the newspaper about the obvious "framing". :lamo
The conspiracy room is down the hall, 3rd door on the left.
Do you really think a jury let him for free for fear of riots? Give me a break. lol
So...Ock.....how do you explain the preservative found in the blood on the sock that Mark Fuhrman allegedly "found" over the wall?
So...Ock.....how do you explain the preservative found in the blood on the sock that Mark Fuhrman allegedly "found" over the wall?
No idea... 3rd door on the left.
It was the LAPD and the incompetent prosecutor's that blew the OJ case.
One of the most basic lessons in law school is " In cross-examination -Never ask a question that you don't know the answer to...and never ask an open ended question"
Chris Darden asking OJ to try on the glove was the turning point of the trial...and he violated both of these basics. He was so certain that he was going to have a "gotcha" moment that he didn't even account for the fact that shrinkage would occur because of the condition of the glove. The DA should have been prepared for that, they could have consulted with experts, but their incompetency overwhelmed them.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?