I wouldn't know.....I didn't have Bush walking around the City where I live. But I did have BO.....when he had no Dog. :lol:
And I say one that runs around worried about being hurt his ENTIRE LIFE.....is not ballsy. Nor one that sits there and Whines and cries and damn near is ready to throw a tantrum.....saying they don't wanna be President with out a Demo Senate. They just don't wanna be, and that thinks things would be so Unbearable.
Just isn't ballsy.....No Matter how much Practice he does in learning to apply some bass to that Mealy mouth wuss ass his carries around.
Not to hard to figure out with what he said himself. Just Sayin. :mrgreen:
Not to hard to figure out with what he said himself. Just Sayin. :mrgreen:
No. But it's REALLY hard to figure out WTF you are trying to say with your CPS English.
OMG, What are the Republican deniers and Rep. Trey Gowdy going to do now? LMMFAO
NYT: Captured Suspect Said Benghazi Attack Was Revenge For Anti-Islam Video
Ahmed Abu Khatallah, the suspect captured by U.S. special forces on Tuesday for his role in the 2012 Benghazi attack, reportedly said he was motivated in part by the anti-Islam online video made in America, according to the New York Times.
"What he did in the period just before the attack has remained unclear. But Mr. Abu Khattala told other Libyans in private conversations during the night of the attack that he was moved to attack the diplomatic mission to take revenge for an insult to Islam in an American-made online video," Times reporter David Kirkpatrick wrote in a story on Khattala on Tuesday.
Immediately following the attack, Khattala declined to say whether the video had anything to do with his role in the Benghazi attack, according to the Times.
The New York Times reported in December that the attack was fueled in part by the anti-Islam video, but did not link Khattala to the video in that investigation.
The scandal surrounding the Obama administration's response to Benghazi was centered on whether or not the attack was related to protests surrounding the video.
OMG, What are the Republican deniers and Rep. Trey Gowdy going to do now? LMMFAO
NYT: Captured Suspect Said Benghazi Attack Was Revenge For Anti-Islam Video
Ahmed Abu Khatallah, the suspect captured by U.S. special forces on Tuesday for his role in the 2012 Benghazi attack, reportedly said he was motivated in part by the anti-Islam online video made in America, according to the New York Times.
"What he did in the period just before the attack has remained unclear. But Mr. Abu Khattala told other Libyans in private conversations during the night of the attack that he was moved to attack the diplomatic mission to take revenge for an insult to Islam in an American-made online video," Times reporter David Kirkpatrick wrote in a story on Khattala on Tuesday.
Immediately following the attack, Khattala declined to say whether the video had anything to do with his role in the Benghazi attack, according to the Times.
The New York Times reported in December that the attack was fueled in part by the anti-Islam video, but did not link Khattala to the video in that investigation.
The scandal surrounding the Obama administration's response to Benghazi was centered on whether or not the attack was related to protests surrounding the video.
LOL. It's all Obamas fault for capturing him.
A planned revenge terrorist attack now equals a spontaneous protest gone bad?
We have hearsay "proof" (from unnamed sources?) that this is (in part?) a fact.
Your problem is that you think it has to be either the video or a terrorist attack when in actuality it was both. What Susan Rice said on the Sunday talk show was the best information available at the time.LOL !
That's not what our State Department said a day after the Terrorist atfack.
You know, when they told the Libyan Government it was Ansar al Sharia.
Hey, wasn't that " protester " interviewed a few times ? Did he ever mention the video ?
Now I know why all other Countries and the Red Cross got the hell out of there.
A YouTube video was pissing off the locals.
It made them so mad they blew a 12 foot hole in the Embassy wall.
Ans wasn't it a " Protest " over a video ? Wasn't this guy a Terrorist ?
Obama and Susan and Hillary are still a bunch of lying scum.
Your problem is that you think it has to be either the video or a terrorist attack when in actuality it was both. What Susan Rice said on the Sunday talk show was the best information available at the time.
Our State Department officially designated this guy as a Terrorist ring leader for Ansar al Sharia back in January.
But nice try
Your problem is that you think it has to be either the video or a terrorist attack when in actuality it was both. What Susan Rice said on the Sunday talk show was the best information available at the time.
Oh. Well then.... Nice job in capturing another terrorist, Obama!
What difference does it make whether it was a video or a planned terrorist attack? Answer: NoneWell your problem is.....you only take the word of the US and its Left Wing Media, and its propaganda.
Which the Libyans and the British. Have shown there was no Protest. But they did manage to discover the Turk Envoy.....that Stevens Met Before the attack took place.
Moreover.....now even Hillary Admitted when she first called BO and talked to him. There was no topic of a Protest or Video. She don't recall any.
But now she says there are answers that are still not known and she would like to know them.
More than likely to try and cover her self. As sooner or later.....it will come out. Who gave Stevens the order to go to Benghazi On 911. Knowing that the Highest Alert for our people. Was not Implemented.
What difference does it make whether it was a video or a planned terrorist attack? Answer: None
What difference does it make whether it was a video or a planned terrorist attack? Answer: None
Hillary says otherwise now.....says she wants answers. Told CNN and Amanpour. It was live.....there is no getting around it anymore.
She says there are still to many unknown answers. She wants those Answers.
Seems that excuse now is over with.
No, it actually makes quite a bit of difference. A spontaneous action is something we cannot plan for. A planned terrorist attack is something for which we can prepare and should. That it happened in a place like Libya makes such a case even more compelling. The facts that have come to light demonstrate that this was a colossal failure of our executive branch in many respects, including the response.
So what you are saying is that failing to anticipate a terrorist attack is a colossal failure of the President.
What did you think of Bush and 9/11 then? A thousand times worse than Obama, no doubt.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?