• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

NY going after guns now?

Dammit! You weren't supposed to mention that!
I know, I know. Why bother with rationality when it's so much easier to jump to outrageous conclusions?
 
I know, I know. Why bother with rationality when it's so much easier to jump to outrageous conclusions?

I don't consider people saying that 'nobody had their guns taken away' an outrageous conclusion. It is simply dishonesty.
 
I don't consider people saying that 'nobody had their guns taken away' an outrageous conclusion. It is simply dishonesty.

Who were those people and where? Legitimate question.
 
I'm not engaging in your silly games.
It's not a game, I'm genuinely curious. In regards to the second story (not the first, in which no guns were confiscated), who dishonestly said no guns were confiscated?

Your refusal to answer this confirms my suspicions.
 
Your refusal to answer this confirms my suspicions.

If your suspicion is because you are simply playing pedantic games, you would be correct.
 
If your suspicion is because you are simply playing pedantic games, you would be correct.

It is a simple question. You've alleged people claimed no guns were confiscated. I'm asking you to show where that happened in this thread.
 
Everyone that has seen a doctor or sought clinical treatment for anxiety or depressions should be stripped of their rights to own weapons, cars, sharp objects, gasoline, and access to children. Obviously, people that have sought such help represent a threat to themselves and others and cannot be trusted. I you live in a home where there are children present, you or the children must be removed. We must act. For the children.
 
Whew, thank goodness we can always count on the lawyers to tell us the truth. :lol:

I love how people always love the conspiracy and are willing to believe anything, but only if it meets the criteria of their opinion.

Uh, if you READ the story, you'd see the POLICE RECORDS show they were going after them. Your attempt to dismiss with a lame crack at the lawyer: FAIL.
 
Uh, if you READ the story, you'd see the POLICE RECORDS show they were going after them. Your attempt to dismiss with a lame crack at the lawyer: FAIL.

Who says? The lawyer, right? Did you read the story? I did, and it clearly is based upon the words of the lawyer.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…