An invalid comparison.
I know, I know. Why bother with rationality when it's so much easier to jump to outrageous conclusions?Dammit! You weren't supposed to mention that!
I know, I know. Why bother with rationality when it's so much easier to jump to outrageous conclusions?
I don't consider people saying that 'nobody had their guns taken away' an outrageous conclusion. It is simply dishonesty.
It's not a game, I'm genuinely curious. In regards to the second story (not the first, in which no guns were confiscated), who dishonestly said no guns were confiscated?I'm not engaging in your silly games.
If your suspicion is because you are simply playing pedantic games, you would be correct.
Your medical records are protected by HIPAA
Whew, thank goodness we can always count on the lawyers to tell us the truth. :lol:Attorney: Records Show State Police Targeted Man For Loss Of Pistol Permit - WBEN NewsRadio 930 : Buffalo & Niagara Falls, NY
The cops lied, they did target the guy.
Whew, thank goodness we can always count on the lawyers to tell us the truth. :lol:
I love how people always love the conspiracy and are willing to believe anything, but only if it meets the criteria of their opinion.
Uh, if you READ the story, you'd see the POLICE RECORDS show they were going after them. Your attempt to dismiss with a lame crack at the lawyer: FAIL.
Who says? The lawyer, right? Did you read the story? I did, and it clearly is based upon the words of the lawyer.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?