- Joined
- Jan 17, 2022
- Messages
- 12,627
- Reaction score
- 12,593
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
Not in the slightest. It just makes you feel good to see a Democratic Senator get assaulted for no reason.It was justified.
He presented credentials when he entered the building.....like all Federal employees do. Anyone at that press conference who thought that Padilla was some kind of "threat" inside a Federal building is just full of shit.And intentionally wasn't presenting any identifying credentials to cultivate the issue.
KNot in the slightest.
It just makes you feel good to see a Democratic Senator get assaulted for no reason.
So why did the FBI stop him?He presented credentials when he entered the building.....like all Federal employees do.
KAnyone at that press conference who thought that Padilla was some kind of "threat" inside a Federal building is just full of shit.
Because they are now Trump's Gestapo....which you love.K
So why did the FBI stop him?
Sure they are.Because they are now Trump's Gestapo....which you love.
The evidence is in the video.Sure they are.
Yeah. Evidence that it was justified.The evidence is in the video.
Lying again....just like your other 2 lies.Yeah. Evidence that it was justified.
The video is lying? How?Lying again....just like your other 2 lies.
It's an obvious power grab. If Trump can permanently keep troops in CA, when it's obvious the vast majority of Californians are against this, then he truly is a king.What Noem said that triggered the Senator is alarming. The plan in LA is a coup in California. They aim to take over the State. The Federal Government has declared war on the People of California. They are starting a Civil War out in the open.
"The Department of Homeland Security and the officers and the agencies and the departments and the military people that are working on this operation will continue to sustain and increase our operations in this city, We are not going away. We are staying here to liberate the city from the socialist and the burdensome leadership that this governor and that this mayor have placed on this country."
No decent, sane person believes Padilla deserved to be treated that way.The video is lying? How?
What Noem said that triggered the Senator is alarming. The plan in LA is a coup in California. They aim to take over the State. The Federal Government has declared war on the People of California. They are starting a Civil War out in the open.
Good."The Department of Homeland Security and the officers and the agencies and the departments and the military people that are working on this operation will continue to sustain and increase our operations in this city, We are not going away. We are staying here to liberate the city from the socialist and the burdensome leadership that this governor and that this mayor have placed on this country."
That makes MAGA a bunch of traitors. You must be excited about watching your movement crash and burn.
Good.
That makes MAGA a bunch of traitors. You must be excited about watching your movement crash and burn.
When the Government declares it is going to take over a US State in an act of war. Welp, nothing but traitors in the MAGA movement.
Are you sure they aren't also eating babies?When the Government declares it is going to take over a US State in an act of war. Welp, nothing but traitors in the MAGA movement.
You meant cats and dogs didn't you.Are you sure they aren't also eating babies?
To be fair, he was asking a question.
. . . and it is this political rhetoric from the Sec which has so inflamed you and others?Kristi said:
"And, yet, what’s even more significant than authorities detaining a U.S. senator for asking a Cabinet secretary a question at a news conference is Noem’s ominous remark immediately prior to Padilla’s interruption.
“We are not going away,” she warned. “We are staying here to liberate the city from the socialists and the burdensome leadership that this governor and that this mayor have placed on this country and what they have tried to insert into the city.”
This I think a fair and reasonable response form the SS given that the Sec. has had death threats against her and her family.I think Your cover story is that he was being violently aggressive so that you can justify in your mind that Padilla deserved the treatment he got.
He was on the stage? I didn't see him on the stage.
You think Trump and the Jan 6 traitors are above the law. That is why you continue to enthusiastically support Trump after he tries to execute his own vice president.
Instead, you would rather whine about a Senator asking a question at a press conference. Pretty ****ed-up, to say the least.
I don't think jail is warranted. Padilla didn't actually assault the security just forced them to remove a bully which is what they are in place for. I think security did a great job removing Padilla and showing exceptional restraint dealing with a bully. Padilla was shown that his bullying was not going to be tolerated. A job well done. I think bullies like Padilla should be removed and no long allowed at such events if they cannot conduct them selves in an orderly fashion. What a shame.Kudos to the officers for their professionalism.
Padilla should absolutely spend time in jail for that.
Your response is a weak attempt to justify the unjustifiable. All videos clearly show Padilla was not "rushing the podium" and also clearly identified himself.. . . and it is this political rhetoric from the Sec which has so inflamed you and others?
To the point where you are denying that SS took appropriate action to control the approach of an uninvited, unannounced, unexpected, unidentified, approaching the podium shouting and agitating.
Is it any wonder that the SS agents assigned to protect the Sec. took him down and controlled the situation?
Its kind what they are charged with doing on behalf of their protectee.
This I think a fair and reasonable response form the SS given that the Sec. has had death threats against her and her family.
Maybe those threats shouldn't been made?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?