No Rogue Rulings Act Passes House (1 Viewer)

[anatta]

Trump-backed bill to stop 'rogue' judges passes House

House lawmakers advanced a bill to block district judges from issuing nationwide injunctions in most cases.

www.foxnews.com

The House of Representatives passed a bill Wednesday to limit federal district judges' ability to affect Trump administration policies on a national scale.

The No Rogue Rulings Act, led by Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., passed the House and limits district courts' power to issue U.S.-wide injunctions, instead forcing them to focus their scope on the parties directly affected in most cases.

All but one Republican lawmaker voted for the bill, which passed 219 to 213. No Democrats voted in favor.

Despite its success in the House, however, the legislation does face uncertain odds in the Senate, where it needs at least several Democrats to hit the chamber's 60-vote threshold.

 

[j brown's body]

Their obsequiousness boggles the mind.

Not content to turn their own legislative power over to Trump, they turn to punishing the courts.

 

[NolanVoyd]

Trump-backed bill to stop 'rogue' judges passes House

House lawmakers advanced a bill to block district judges from issuing nationwide injunctions in most cases.

www.foxnews.com

The House of Representatives passed a bill Wednesday to limit federal district judges' ability to affect Trump administration policies on a national scale.

The No Rogue Rulings Act, led by Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., passed the House and limits district courts' power to issue U.S.-wide injunctions, instead forcing them to focus their scope on the parties directly affected in most cases.

All but one Republican lawmaker voted for the bill, which passed 219 to 213. No Democrats voted in favor.

Despite its success in the House, however, the legislation does face uncertain odds in the Senate, where it needs at least several Democrats to hit the chamber's 60-vote threshold.

Don't you even realize how unconstutional thst is?

 

[BirdinHand]

Performative bullshit.

This won't go anywhere.

 

[Mycroft]

Trump-backed bill to stop 'rogue' judges passes House

House lawmakers advanced a bill to block district judges from issuing nationwide injunctions in most cases.

www.foxnews.com

The House of Representatives passed a bill Wednesday to limit federal district judges' ability to affect Trump administration policies on a national scale.

The No Rogue Rulings Act, led by Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., passed the House and limits district courts' power to issue U.S.-wide injunctions, instead forcing them to focus their scope on the parties directly affected in most cases.

All but one Republican lawmaker voted for the bill, which passed 219 to 213. No Democrats voted in favor.

Despite its success in the House, however, the legislation does face uncertain odds in the Senate, where it needs at least several Democrats to hit the chamber's 60-vote threshold.

It'll be interesting to see which Republican Senators try to put the kibosh on this bill. Surely, they know they'll be putting their political careers in jeopardy.

 

[j brown's body]

It'll be interesting to see which Republican Senators try to put the kibosh on this bill. Surely, they know they'll be putting their political careers in jeopardy.

Indeed. There's no room for ethics in Trumpworld.

 

[anatta]

Don't you even realize how unconstutional thst is?

Congress controls/regulates the judiciary xcept for SCOTUS

 

[anatta]

It'll be interesting to see which Republican Senators try to put the kibosh on this bill. Surely, they know they'll be putting their political careers in jeopardy.

I dont see any Republican opposition.. well I havent looked all that much. The problem as usual is the Dems who are perfectly fine in using 'rogue' district judges to conduct lawfare,, has to get 60 votes assuming Dmes will continue the lawfare,
On the other hand no more venue shopping. SCOTUS ruled on that against Boasberg

 

[NuffSaid]

It'll be interesting to see which Republican Senators try to put the kibosh on this bill. Surely, they know they'll be putting their political careers in jeopardy.

Any R Senator who opposes the bill will be threatened by Mush and investigated by Bondi and Patel.

 

[NuffSaid]

I dont see any Republican opposition.. well I havent looked all that much. The problem as usual is the Dems who are perfectly fine in using 'rogue' district judges to conduct lawfare,, has to get 60 votes assuming Dmes will continue the lawfare,
On the other hand no more venue shopping. SCOTUS ruled on that against Boasberg

Eileen Cannon is MAGA's vision of a great judge.
Sucks up to Trump at every turn. Ignores laws. Goes on feelings.
Any other judge who dares to try and follow the law is "rogue" and is involved with "lawfare".
You guys are too much.

 

[Integrityrespec]

Trump-backed bill to stop 'rogue' judges passes House

House lawmakers advanced a bill to block district judges from issuing nationwide injunctions in most cases.

www.foxnews.com

The House of Representatives passed a bill Wednesday to limit federal district judges' ability to affect Trump administration policies on a national scale.

The No Rogue Rulings Act, led by Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., passed the House and limits district courts' power to issue U.S.-wide injunctions, instead forcing them to focus their scope on the parties directly affected in most cases.

All but one Republican lawmaker voted for the bill, which passed 219 to 213. No Democrats voted in favor.

Despite its success in the House, however, the legislation does face uncertain odds in the Senate, where it needs at least several Democrats to hit the chamber's 60-vote threshold.

This is a good bill. It limits district judges to ruling within their districts and only on plaintiffs that actually reside in their jurisdiction and appear in their courts. This will stop the insanity of a California judge ruling on things done in D.C. District courts are meant to be just that.

 

[anatta]

Eileen Cannon is MAGA's vision of a great judge.
Sucks up to Trump at every turn. Ignores laws. Goes on feelings.
Any other judge who dares to try and follow the law is "rogue" and is involved with "lawfare".
You guys are too much.

she isn't issuing nationwide TROs

 

[NolanVoyd]

Congress controls/regulates the judiciary xcept for SCOTUS

Congress van not legislate away the courts constitutional designated duties.

Yiy really should take a civics course.

 

[NuffSaid]

she isn't issuing nationwide TROs

That's because she's in favor of everything Trump does. Why would she issue anything against Trump?

 

[anatta]

Congress van not legislate away the courts constitutional designated duties.

Yiy really should take a civics course.

no one is talking ending judicial review

 

[j brown's body]

This is a good bill. It limits district judges to ruling within their districts and only on plaintiffs that actually reside in their jurisdiction and appear in their courts. This will stop the insanity of a California judge ruling on things done in D.C. District courts are meant to be just that.

But never an issue anyone thought much about until a convicted criminal was elected president.

Commentary: GOP thinks the court orders they used against Biden should be outlawed — because they now target Trump

Republicans and conservatives deployed nationwide injunctions to block Biden policies. Now that they're used against Trump, they think they're bad.

www.latimes.com

 

[BirdinHand]

Federal judges rule on federal cases based on federal law. Federal law applies across the entire US.

MAGAs don’t grasp this.

 

[Lisa]

no one is talking ending judicial review

What do you think the job of the federal appeals district courts are? They arent there for milk and cookies.

What part of the constitutional system of checks and balances of power seems to confuse you?

 

[NolanVoyd]

This is a good bill. It limits district judges to ruling within their districts and only on plaintiffs that actually reside in their jurisdiction and appear in their courts. This will stop the insanity of a California judge ruling on things done in D.C. District courts are meant to be just that.

It's unconstitutional.

Let's say congress passes a law that only brown eyed people can register automobiles. A district judge in Pigsknuckle Arkansas is the first to hear a related case and rules on the grounds that the law is unconstitutional.

The judge issues an injunction that the law cannot be enforced.

The injunction applies to enforcing the law, anywhere, not just in pigsknuckle Arkansas.

The judge isn't ruling that in Pigsknuckle Arkansas the law is unconstitutional, but the law itself is unconstitutional, so it can't be enforced anywhere.

That is the courts constitutionally designated role.

The legislature cannot change that without an amnendment.

 

[j brown's body]

It's unconstitutional.

Let's say congress passes a law that only brown eyed people can register automobiles. A district judge in Pigsknuckle Arkansas is the first to hear a related case on the grounds that the law is unconstitutional.

The judge issues an injunction that the law cannot be enforced.

The injunction applies to enforcing the law, anywhere, not just in pigsknuckle Arkansas.

The judge isn't ruling that in Pigsknuckle Arkansas the law is unconstitutional, but the law itself is unconstitutional, so it can't be enforced anywhere.

That is the courts constitutionally designated role.

The legislature cannot change that without an amnendment.

Still, they have to do it. Trump demands it.

 

[Ishm]

It'll be interesting to see which Republican Senators try to put the kibosh on this bill. Surely, they know they'll be putting their political careers in jeopardy.

And that is a key indication of how the Trump dictatorship works. Republicans in congress too scared to vote for what they believe in, or what they believe best serves the voters they represent. Just blind obedience to their king. And magas like our poster here think this is a good thing. Madness!!

If this gets passed, just watch all the caterwauling when we have the next Dem president and the magas try to do some judge shopping to get some policy they don't like stopped nationwide through the lower courts. Maybe some more student debt relief for instance!

 

[NolanVoyd]

no one is talking ending judicial review

If a judge rules that federal a law is unconstitutional and issues an injunction halting its enforcement that applies anywhere the law is in effect, everywhere, not just in one little district.

 

[Lisa]

It's unconstitutional.

Let's say congress passes a law that only brown eyed people can register automobiles. A district judge in Pigsknuckle Arkansas is the first to hear a related case and rules on the grounds that the law is unconstitutional.

The judge issues an injunction that the law cannot be enforced.

The injunction applies to enforcing the law, anywhere, not just in pigsknuckle Arkansas.

The judge isn't ruling that in Pigsknuckle Arkansas the law is unconstitutional, but the law itself is unconstitutional, so it can't be enforced anywhere.

That is the courts constitutionally designated role.

The legislature cannot change that without an amnendment.

Its a damn shame that civics concepts that were taught in the 1970s on Saturday Morning's "Schoolhouse Rock" are now public policy discussions with Trump and his idiot retinue of MAGA.

 

[BirdinHand]

Still, they have to do it. Trump demands it.

They’re ignorant.

No more, no less.