- Joined
- Oct 12, 2005
- Messages
- 281,619
- Reaction score
- 100,389
- Location
- Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
I have no interest in the question. Not sure why you think I do.
But you apparently have no interest in the outcome, which sure seems like an Achilles Heel in your posturing.
On the type is a good question. I think she said 2 seemmi automatic rifles and 2 shotguns and a leeever action rifle. Wonder if they or she is going to ban shotguns and leeever actions?
What we Americans should be doing-is banning anti gun idiots from holding public office.
Any dumber then our politicians? I think a good lot of ours are dumber. Kinda like dumb and dumber, just depends on who opens their mouth first.Punish all the good guys for the actions of one bad guy.
They still haven't figured out that bad guys don't obey gun laws.
Could they be any dumber?
Sure it is, its shown that when a shooter targets a place where people are armed they don't last long, and there are usually no casualties other than the shooter.
What about Parkland?
you mean an area where no one armed was present to deal with the shooter and a deputy was too yellow to engage the shooter? what of it?
I'd say put a cheerleaders skirt on Pelosi so she could lead,but I still need to sleep tonight.Maybe the new dear AOC?And the left cheers it on.
there are thousands of legally owned autos and there is about zero cases of those being missed.
You labor under the delusion that "sacrifices" that you want to impose on gun owners will save lives.
You also spew idiocy-your view is that anything that can be used to harm others, should be banned to prevent criminals from using it. Nice Fascist attitude in that sentiment.
I thought there were 2 armed security guards at Stoneman Douglass. If there were that makes your positions look quite silly. Keeping guns out of the hands of the likes of the shooter is far easier than depending on "yellow" security guards.
No, I don't spew idiocy. Idiocy is thinking that access to guns keeps the murder rate down.
Don't grin to much because that's exactly it. Do away with the electoral(CA , NY and other large dem. cities choose the POTUS.) Extended Supreme Court, 16 year olds voting.Of course they do ... because they wish they had one here. (grin)
They weren't in the vicinity. It is like saying that four people had fatal heart attacks in Disney land despite the fact there were several first aid stations.
People like you seem unable to comprehend that guns in the hands of honest people are a benefit in crime control, while guns in the hands of criminals are deleterious. It is mainly because you see gun owners as the enemy and you are unable to distinguish between legal gun owners and criminals. So you tend to lump them into the same category.
I bet if we made it easier for people to buy assault rifles our murder rate would go down :thumbs:
Regardless you had two armed guards. And they didn't stop the shooter. Our schools shouldn't need to be manned like Fort Knox.
How many people have been killed with assault rifles in the US?
Not really, I don't think we have a crime problem, relative to history. We have a crazy and racist guy going on a rampage problem.
I already said, my thinking isn't in crime prevention, rather in crazy fantasy prevention.
Seat belts don't save everyone who crashes
Fire extinguishers do not stop all house fires
Alarm systems do not stop all burglaries
Vaccines don't prevent all those vaccinated from getting the flu
Antibiotics do not resolve favorably, all bacterial infections
but if you don't want to die in a car crash-you wear a seat belt
if you don't want to get the flu-you get a vaccine
if you don't want a stove fire burning down your home-you have a fire extinguisher handy
and if you are sick from a bacterial infection, you use antibiotics.
In 80 years, there was not a single case of a private citizen ever using a full auto firearm that was legally owned to kill anyone. Saying they needed to be banned to prevent something that had not happened in 80 years is moronic for two reasons
1) it is paranoid beyond imagination
2) and using that stupid logic-almost every other gun should be banned before autos.
If you could walk in pass a BGC and pay between $800-$1200 instead of thousands 15-25 But I guess first the NFA would need repealed.I bet if we made it easier for people to buy assault rifles our murder rate would go down :thumbs:
How many people have been killed with assault rifles in the US?
"Assault weapons bans reduced the number of school shooting victims by 54.4 percent," Mark Gius of Quinnipiac University writes in the journal Applied Economics Letters. "All other gun-control laws—concealed-carry laws, private-sale background checks, and federal dealer background checks—had no statistically significant effect on school shootings."
Still waiting for the real assault weapons.
In a 2014 study that analyzed data covering the years 1982 to 2011, he found "both state and federal assault weapon bans have statistically significant and negative effects on mass shooting fatalities."
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?