I wonder, what if McSame had actually tried to distance himself from Bush's actions? Would he be doing better than Obama thus far? I mean, he wouldn't have gotten nearly as much slack as Obama, but still...
thoughts?
Let's see, do I choose to believe the conservative Rand Corp's report commissioned by the Pentagon with the most extensive analysis of terrorist groups to date? Or your report?
We've sacrificed thousands of lives and spent 3 trillion dollars of taxpayer debt and there are more terrorist attacks worldwide now than there were before we started our "war on terror".
According to the Rand Report, military solutions to terrorists have been effective only 7% of the time. We cannot afford another decade of a failed approach in dealing with the terrorists.
A fool and his money are soon parted! As Bin Laden must have known.
So you didn't believe McCain when he was doing all his saber rattling against Iran, "the preeminent threat of our time" he called them.
McCain still thought everything was hunky dory after economy had collapsed, and he was opposed to health care reform.
Definitely the greater of the two evils in the majority of voters minds.
Thankfully!
1. Sabre rattling is cheap, especially considering that the last thing McCain (or his handlers) would want would be for him to START A WAR. and even if he managed to, it wouldn't last more than 60 days unless the Democrats wanted the blood on their hands. The Republicans wouldn't be able to stop them if they REALLY wanted a War in congress, and maybe they would have wanted a War, another blow to the Republican party perhaps...but either way, it's all underhanded tactics.
2. A lot of people did, and a lot of people were. That's politics. He isn't all bad policies, you know. And even if he was, he wouldn't be the only one.
3. He is no more dangerous to this country than Obama can still turn out to be. Hindisight being 20/20 though we'll have to wait it out and then call our Woulda/Shoulda/Couldas when it's all said and done.
I agree - it's almost a toss between who is worse - Shiitstains McCain or Obama - I actually think McCain may have been worse - he is McLame, but he does know how to get some things done seeing he has been in there for so long, and what he would do wouldn't agree with someone like me.
2 things:
1. Might wanna fix that little typo that passed the wordfilter
2. We have to remember, when electing a President, while our own convictions and wants are important, we SHOULD think about who's a better choice, or lesser evil, for turning the country around. If we all wanted someone who did what we wanted and **** anyone who thinks differently well....well that's where we are today.
Anyway - even a very liberal leader like Obama..........
He is no more dangerous to this country than Obama can still turn out to be.
Fortunately, the American voters saw the choice differently!
I know you would say the same thing had McCain been voted.....
Don't have a clue what you are trying to say there. My point was that the majority of voters picked the moderate choice.
I'm saying, in your infinite bi-partisaness, you would be open and happy either way, or equally disappointed, regardless of candidate.
Liberal? LOL! Kucinich was liberal. Obama was the moderate candidate.
Liberal? LOL! Kucinich was liberal. Obama was the moderate candidate.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?