My wife and I never get flu shots and are both over 65. And the last time either one of us got the flu is at least a decade ago. We have friends who always get a flu shot and are fanatics about it. Both recently had the flu - one a pretty severe case.
As an adult I have only had the flu once. My wife at the time got it also. We could not get out of bed for several days. Bad. But that was many years ago & I did not think of getting vaccinated.
This new drug treats the flu once you've come down with it. It is not prophylactic like the vaccine.
https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/uritheflu/74940In the phase III trial, median time to alleviation of symptoms was 53.7 hours (95% CI 49.5-58.5) for patients on baloxavir versus 80.2 hours (95% CI 72.6-80.1, P<0.001) for patients on placebo, reported Frederick G. Hayden, MD, of the University of Virginia School of Medicine in Charlottesville, and colleagues
Thanks for explaining that. I saw the diagram and immediately just did the usual "flu shot" post.
https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/uritheflu/74940
Is this worth $180 to you?
Not to me.
Thanks for explaining that. I saw the diagram and immediately just did the usual "flu shot" post.
If I will miss more than one day of work (Worth roughly $250), it is well worth it to me. To some others, it may not be. Seems to me the ones who spent (b/m)illions in research get to decide what they price it at. Then the public decides what is worth it to them.
If I will miss more than one day of work (Worth roughly $250), it is well worth it to me. To some others, it may not be. Seems to me the ones who spent (b/m)illions in research get to decide what they price it at. Then the public decides what is worth it to them.
Denying people the good works of civilization by the practice of ripping people off is one that you should reconsider your support for.
This is bad for us all the way around, both individually and collectively.
Denying a company the results of taking risks on innovations that change the world is something you should consider, both individually and collectively.
If they are not willing to do things on a reasonable cost basis I say **** them, privatize their asses.....then hand off the operation to a newly formed non profit NGO.
My wife and I never get flu shots and are both over 65. And the last time either one of us got the flu is at least a decade ago. We have friends who always get a flu shot and are fanatics about it. Both recently had the flu - one a pretty severe case.
https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/uritheflu/74940
Is this worth $180 to you?
Not to me.
My wife and I never get flu shots and are both over 65. And the last time either one of us got the flu is at least a decade ago. We have friends who always get a flu shot and are fanatics about it. Both recently had the flu - one a pretty severe case.
Flu shots are based on the best guess as to what strains of the virus are going to be prevalent in the coming season. Being a guess means it's never going to be 100% effective. You could be infected by a strain not covered by the vaccine. This new drug stops any flu virus dead with one pill because it cripples the virus particles from multiplying.
The part of the virus that the immune system recognizes & attacks is the outer shell of proteins called the capsid. These proteins keep mutating, giving rise to new strains that your immune system won't reciognize. The enzyme that this new drug deactivates is called an endonuclease. It's amino acid sequence looks to be conserved by evolution so it will always react with the new drug, deactivating it, so the flu virus can't spread further.
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/09/why-flu-vaccines-so-often-failDanuta Skowronski, an epidemiologist at the BC Centre for Disease Control in Vancouver, Canada, instead blames mutations in the vaccine strain itself. The most common influenza vaccine contains an "inactivated" virus, which manufacturers grow in chicken eggs. As Skowronski's team first reported in 2014, the virus can mutate while it is growing in the eggs, resulting in a vaccine unable to block circulating strains.
"I think [these mutations] play an enormous role," says viral immunologist Scott Hensley of the University of Pennsylvania. He has preliminary evidence that egg-adapted mutations were behind the weak protection seen with the vaccine used in the 2016–17 season, he says. He also points to a recent study by another group that compared an egg-grown vaccine with one that contained genetically engineered HA, which sidesteps the mutation issue. The engineered vaccine offered more solid protection. That suggests a way to improve current vaccines, Hensley says. "I'd be shocked in 15 years if any of our flu vaccines are grown in eggs.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?