Do they or don’t they have the evidence?
I don't think you can be more disingenuous if you hired a team of disingenuous temps.Fine, let’s get the show started. Let’s get him out of office. House should immediately vote and get this to the senate. Why the delay? Doesn’t the House have the evidence after three years? Doesn’t the House have the votes?
Something to consider relative to those in the 'support Impeachment' vote. Its the "Bring it on crowd". I'm in that demographic. I want Nancy to have the vote and let's see the consequences for all as a result
-VySky
Facts are decidingly anti-Trump. Therefore, facts must be dismissed in favor of the "truth" told by Trump -- who has 12,000 plus lies on record. You really can't get into the minds of trumpsters.Have you fallen so far down the rabbit hole that you've end up claiming Fox news are anti Trump?
Same difference. They aren't any more credible either. You are pushing pure propaganda, a deliberate lie, nothing more. Everything about mainstream media today is based upon deliberately lies. US media is even less trustworthy than politicians.
I don't think you can be more disingenuous if you hired a team of disingenuous temps.
You say "hurry up," while the White house stonewalls on subpoenas necessary to conduct the investigation. Either you are for the stonewalling or you want the stonewalling to stop to get to a quick conclusion. Can't have both. Please pick a lane.
Lol Who do you think you are dealing with? Your premise is flawed andThere have been cries for impeachment for the last three years. I’m assuming when you tell the country three years ago that you have the evidence to impeach, you proceed. Are you telling me now that there was no evidence to impeach until five weeks ago?
Keep telling yourself that if it lets you survive. But you can't lie to yourself forever.
Have you fallen so far down the rabbit hole that you've end up claiming Fox news are anti Trump?
Are you saying
a) they are all making up the fact that a poll was done at all?
b) There are poll results, and they support Trump, but all news organizations are reporting on bogus results?
c) Only poll results that support your opinion are correct?
d) There are no polling firms in the U.S. that actually know how to conduct polls, they are all wrong.
Or is it just the news source? If so, where can I go to get the reliable news that you count on? Help me out.
You are very dishonest. You can’t answer my question whether there is evidence to impeach. I have heard for two and half years of BS claiming evidence of wrongdoing, evidence enough to impeach and now we have to wait yet again because why? Because the democrats have been lying to us. There has never been any evidence of wrongdoing and they are proceeding with this inquiry in hopes of finding something.
Yes, we understand precisely what you are claiming -- that all news that puts Trump in bad light is propaganda/fake news and the only true word is that of the Great Leader with 'unmatched wisdom.' We just can't believe that an intelligent person can come to such an absurd conclusion.I'm claiming that all media propaganda being pushed as "news" is "the enemy of the people." Fox News is just as guilty of pushing propaganda as CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, or MSNBC. Or do you not understand the meaning of propaganda?
Lol Who do you think you are dealing with? Your premise is flawed and
your logic thereafter is even more so. You had better build whole lot stronger binary box than this pathetic cardboard example you've created, before you ever shove me inside one. This one isn't even worth the caloric expenditure to knock down in a post.
Next time you quote a post of mine, you could try actually discussing the content written therein.
Remember, I'm not the one that claimed Hillary would win the 2016 election by a landslide. That would be your precious propaganda polls that you put so much blind faith into. The fact that you give them any credibility at all tells me you want to keep believing your media fantasies, despite the fact that they repeatedly lie to you every damn day. How truly pathetic is that?
But how can I answer that question? How can ANYONE answer that question before the documents requested are reviewed -- but they can't be reviewed because the WH is stonewalling the release? What we can presume is that if those documents proved Trump vindication, they'd print a million copies and hand them out on Pennsylvania Ave.
You, however, have already decided that there is no evidence. Only a completely closed minded person would conclude there is no evidence before evidence is presented. What evidence does exist is in plain site -- Trump admitting on camera that he pressured the Ukrainian president to investigate his political rival.
What you are asking is like asking a jury before the prosecutor presents a case, "hey, do you think the defendant is guilty?"
It was a Fox News poll.
I thought Fox News was fake news. I bet, if I bothered to look, I could find a quote of yours saying that very thing. But, blatant hypocrisy aside, Fox polled 48% democrat, and 40% republican, so SURPRISE...
The polling closely reflects party separation in the country. There are more registered Democrats than registered Republicans. The poll of course also included independents. The FoxNews poll is well regarded, unlike its lineup of talking heads.
It's time to get this impeachment going. We need to save our Democratic Republic before Trump does even more damage.
New poll finds more than half support impeaching Trump and removing him from office - CNNPolitics
I am responding to the portion in bold because the rest makes assertions that are not factual, such as saying Democrats said they had the evidence to impeach in 2017. I don't recall Democrats making such a statement, so I dismiss wha tyou wrote as creative writing.Are you a politician or just want to continue lying to yourself.
Let me make it as simple as possible. Let’s work with the period from January 2017 to May 2019. That would be before the Biden-Ukraine scandal. Over the course of that time (2017 to May 2019) I heard 24/7 about impeachment, about crimes by the president, about obstruction and collusion. Throughout this time the democrats claimed to have evidence and they wanted to proceed with impeachment but never did.
With all the evidence of criminal activity by Trump from 2017 to May 2019 why didn’t they impeach?
Save the argument that he stonewalled during the Mueller investigation because that is not true.
So back to my initial question, with so much evidence of wrongdoing prior to May 2019, why no vote of impeachment.
The White House is stonewalling now because they want a vote. When they vote to impeach than the White House will have no other choice but to comply with subpoenas.
I am responding to the portion in bold because the rest makes assertions that are not factual, such as saying Democrats said they had the evidence to impeach in 2017. I don't recall Democrats making such a statement, so I dismiss wha tyou wrote as creative writing.
Regarding the bold, you make the outlandish claim that the House has to vote on impeachment before they receive the documents that would substantiate an impeachment vote. In what crazy universe does that make sense? That would be like a grand jury voting to indict without seeing or hearing any evidence. Nevertheless, that's what you are saying the House should do -- parroting Trump's attorney's, whose word you accept without critical thinking.
The way this works is that the House collects evidence and then determines whether an impeachment vote is warranted or not. However, the WH is refusing to turn over documents and witnesses. Any reasonable person would conclude that the WH has something to hide. If not, they would be forthcoming. Only the guilty try hide the evidence and obstruct the proceedings.
The polling closely reflects party separation in the country. There are more registered Democrats than registered Republicans. The poll of course also included independents. The FoxNews poll is well regarded, unlike its lineup of talking heads.
Uh huh. Sounds like Fox News is just fine when you think it supports you, and fake when it doesn't. I swear, it sounds just like that. So much so, I think it is that. I've never heard a meow and found a dog to be the source.
"STUNNING. FOX News Plays Trick on Viewers – Oversamples Democrats by 14 POINTS in Junk Impeachment Poll"
STUNNING. FOX News Plays Trick on Viewers - Oversamples Democrats by 14 POINTS in Junk Impeachment Poll
Believe what you want.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?