• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

NBC's Savannah Guthrie Interrupts Trump 61 Times At Town Hall

I get angry when when people insult my intelligence by lying to me about things that are common knowledge. Do your research.

Self exempted from supporting cites? Predictable. Rules are, anyone I suspect is guilty until proven innocent, because I say so, and "everybody knows", blah, blah....

And the results of, unsupported suspicion confirms guilt, are in, they've been in. Extreme right, clown parade.:
 
Because they wouldn't let trump tell the truth? Is that what you're saying? Trump is a jerk, he acted like a jerk at the debate and he continues to act like a jerk. He's immune ya' know and he saved suburbia. So please like him. Jerk.
WOW she must have really done something right for all of you to be "poor poor pitiful Trumping..........." Go Savannah!!
 
I get angry when when people insult my intelligence by lying to me about things that are common knowledge. Do your research.
You made a claim that you KNEW Biden was lying....it's on you to back it up.
 
More interesting in debating Trump, than allowing questions from town hall members, NBC's Savannah Guthrie stepped on every answer Trump gave at their town hall last night, interrupting Trump a total of 61 times.

When Trump behaved like this, constantly interrupting Biden in the first Presidential Debate, the liberal media was enraged, acting like Trump's behavior was monstrous.


"I was so upset after the presidential and vice presidential debates, I couldn't sleep," a friend told me on a Zoom call. "I'm going to have PTSD!" The tenor of both faceoffs deeply disturbed me, as well. In watching the debates, many of us cringed, particularly as President Donald Trump continually interrupted former Vice President Joe Biden. We felt as if he were directly attacking our deepest values -- our trust in democracy, fairness, common decency and respect for others."

Savannah Guthrie exhibited the exact same behavior, perhaps with the exception that she put a smile on her face while she was doing it, and this was the NYT headline...


Do Democrats have any real values?



Here's why I call BS on this...

Trump was defended by the right when he turned the first the debate into a dumpster fire by not following the rules as he had previously agreed to, by over-talking/interrupting/changing the subject/refusing to answer debate questions to Biden and the moderator, Wallace.

In the town hall meeting, he tried to do the same thing again...only he was rebuffed by the moderator, Guthrie. He wasn't interrupted 61 times...it was 61 attempts to get him to stick to the rules as agreed upon/to answer questions/to not talk over her/and to stop lying or provide factually incorrect points. But you want us to think that he was the victim here?

C'mon, snowflake...that's just stupid.

Side note: if your avatar pic is Charlie Kirk, how do you feel about TPUSA's currently under investigation of falsifying audit information?

 
Last edited:
I get angry when when people insult my intelligence by lying to me about things that are common knowledge. Do your research.
So you're unable to provide any evidence at all to your claim that "Biden lied through his teeth"? No surprise there because without proof it shows that you just made it up or that you wish it were the truth. Either way what you wrote is BS or you would prove it. Alternatively you can admit you were wrong and show the Forum that you're human like all of us and can admit when you get something wrong.
 
So you're unable to provide any evidence at all to your claim that "Biden lied through his teeth"? No surprise there because without proof it shows that you just made it up or that you wish it were the truth. Either way what you wrote is BS or you would prove it. Alternatively you can admit you were wrong and show the Forum that you're human like all of us and can admit when you get something wrong.

I am more able to prove my point than you are able to produce the 20,000 lies you claim Trump has made, which is why I refuse to waste my time with people like you.
 
Self exempted from supporting cites? Predictable. Rules are, anyone I suspect is guilty until proven innocent, because I say so, and "everybody knows", blah, blah....

And the results of, unsupported suspicion confirms guilt, are in, they've been in. Extreme right, clown parade.:

It's like I said, if you can't be bothered to put the time into current events that
I have it would be a waste of time to try to educate you, that never ends well.
 
I am more able to prove my point than you are able to produce the 20,000 lies you claim Trump has made, which is why I refuse to waste my time with people like you.

"people like you."
I am more able to prove my point than you are able to produce the 20,000 lies you claim Trump has made, which is why I refuse to waste my time with people like you.

"people like you." Sigh......

The "hyper partisan" "never trumper" Toronto Star gave up tracking Trump's lies years ago, after Daniel Dale left that publication, but up
till then, the lies were documented similarly to the Washington Post, fact checker's uninterrupted "documentation", depicted in the image below.

Toronto Star documentation of Trump's lies, up until June, 2019:
WorldAnalysis
Donald Trump has now said more than 5,000 false things as president
His pace has slowed some since the midterms, but the president’s dishonesty is still a lot. He’s made an astonishing 5,276 false claims in office, an overall average of 6.1 per day.
Jun. 07, 2019


WorldAnalysis
Trump invents imaginary machine, touts imaginary poll number, warns of imaginary conspiracy
May. 09, 2019

WorldAnalysis
Trump blasts judge who doesn’t exist, says wind turbines cause cancer and gives the 3rd-most-dishonest speech of his presidency
May. 09, 2019


Toronto Star is still offering commentary. I understand that Trump instructed those who find him irresistible to only listen to him, all critics are "never trumpers", out to deny Trump the amount of "credit", equivalent to the volume of all the world's oceans, that he expects is "due to him".

Below is a visualization of this Washington Post fact checking of Trump's lies, only since his January 20, 2017, American Carnage speech.:

President Trump has made more than 20,000 false or ...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...e-more-than-20000-false-or-misleading-claims/
"July 13, 2020 at 3:00 AM EDT It took President Trump 827 days to top 10,000 false and misleading claims in The Fact Checker's database , an average of 12 claims a day.

But on July 9, just 440 days later, the president crossed the 20,000 mark — an average of 23 claims a day over a 14-month period, which included the events leading up to Trump’s impeachment trial, the worldwide pandemic that crashed the economy and the eruption of protests over the death of George Floyd in police custody.

The coronavirus pandemic has spawned a whole new genre of Trump’s falsehoods. The category in just a few months has reached nearly 1,000 claims, more than his tax claims combined. Trump’s false or misleading claims about the impeachment investigation — and the events surrounding it — contributed almost 1,200 entries to the database...."




50506492967_c137879c75_k.jpg
 
Last edited:
It's like I said, if you can't be bothered to put the time into current events that
I have it would be a waste of time to try to educate you, that never ends well.


Projecting Trump's obvious, irresistible influence over you as, "to put the time into current events that I have,"

Your replies are "grift", "confidence man" flavored, empty, (full of yourself = empty) manipulations.

Partisan "lightening" defrauding "the marks" or are those who are irresistibly attracted to Trump not understanding what Trump has been doing to them; sucking out there souls....

Judge finalizes $25 million settlement for 'victims of ...
https://abcnews.go.com/US/judge-fin...ement-victims-donald-trumps/story?id=54347237
Schneiderman first sued Trump in 2013 for allegedly defrauding thousands of Trump University attendees out of millions of dollars. The $25 million settlement will recover about 90 percent of the ...

Steve Bannon, 'We Build the Wall' organizers arrested ...
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/st...ed-in-online-fundraising-scheme-doj-announces
Steve Bannon, 'We Build The Wall' organizers arrested, charged with defrauding donors. Steve Bannon, a former adviser to President Trump, was among four suspects arrested and indicted in ...

A confidence trick is an attempt to defraud a person or group after first gaining their trust. Confidence tricks exploit victims using their credulity, naïveté, compassion, vanity, irresponsibility, and greed. Researchers have defined confidence tricks as "a distinctive species of fraudulent conduct ... intending to further voluntary exchanges that are not mutually beneficial", as they "benefit con operators ('con men') at the expense of their victims (the 'marks')".[1]
 
Last edited:
Your replies are "grift", "confidence man" flavored, empty manipulations.

You just wasted 3-4 paragraphs telling me about these alleged "Trump lies" but you didn't say what the lies were and with people like you I've found what they claim to be "lies" are often misquoted. Your replies are nothing burgers.
 
Trump was defended by the right when he turned the first the debate into a dumpster fire...

In the town hall meeting, he tried to do the same thing again...only he was rebuffed by the moderator, Guthrie...

Im confused. Are we ok with interrupting or not?
 

Projecting Trump's obvious, irresistible influence over you as, "to put the time into current events that I have,"

Your replies are "grift", "confidence man" flavored, empty, (full of yourself = empty) manipulations.

Partisan "lightening" defrauding "the marks" or are those who are irresistibly attracted to Trump not understanding what Trump has been doing to them; sucking out there souls....

Judge finalizes $25 million settlement for 'victims of ...
https://abcnews.go.com/US/judge-fin...ement-victims-donald-trumps/story?id=54347237
Schneiderman first sued Trump in 2013 for allegedly defrauding thousands of Trump University attendees out of millions of dollars. The $25 million settlement will recover about 90 percent of the ...

Steve Bannon, 'We Build the Wall' organizers arrested ...
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/st...ed-in-online-fundraising-scheme-doj-announces
Steve Bannon, 'We Build The Wall' organizers arrested, charged with defrauding donors. Steve Bannon, a former adviser to President Trump, was among four suspects arrested and indicted in ...

A confidence trick is an attempt to defraud a person or group after first gaining their trust. Confidence tricks exploit victims using their credulity, naïveté, compassion, vanity, irresponsibility, and greed. Researchers have defined confidence tricks as "a distinctive species of fraudulent conduct ... intending to further voluntary exchanges that are not mutually beneficial", as they "benefit con operators ('con men') at the expense of their victims (the 'marks')".[1]


I noticed you e edited your reply AFTER I answered it, and it has a story about Steve Bannon, who is not Trump.The Trump university fiasco happened before Trump was president, it has no bearing on his presidency. This is the kind of things you people do: dishonest misdirection plays.
 
Back
Top Bottom