All he had to do was comply with the subpoena. He's getting what he should. It's good to see the lawlessness held accountable.
Good, he is a slimy little reprobate.That didn't take long. Considering that navarro didn't put forward any defense. He had none.
He's going to prison.
He's a pompous ass? Explains everything.Can someone explain why Peter Navarro thought he did not have to comply with the subpoena?
another piece of crap is wiped away!!He's going to prison.
When someone tells you what they've done, Lady Justice often listens.That didn't take long. Considering that navarro didn't put forward any defense. He had none.
He's going to prison.
he insists tRump told him not to show upCan someone explain why Peter Navarro thought he did not have to comply with the subpoena?
they did the same thing for steve bannon upon conviction for the same violationAnd why does the court see fit to wait four ****ing months to sentence him? The max he can get is a year in prison.
Steve Bannon sentenced to 4 months in prison for defying Jan. 6 committee subpoena, but remains free, pending appeal
Because he foolishly believed he was/is above the law.Can someone explain why Peter Navarro thought he did not have to comply with the subpoena?
If he was that worried, he could have plead the 5th. Now look at all his stupid trouble.All he had to do was comply with the subpoena. He's getting what he should. It's good to see the lawlessness held accountable.
Trump told him to defy it. He also expected Trump to invoke executive privilege, which he never did.Can someone explain why Peter Navarro thought he did not have to comply with the subpoena?
Depends on how much they enjoyed it...She must have chipped Navarro with a GPS transponder……
How much can lawyers charge for a two day affair?
Justice delayed...And why does the court see fit to wait four ****ing months to sentence him? The max he can get is a year in prison.
I'm not surprised. He's a contemptible creature.another piece of crap is wiped away!!
I think he was trying to go with the lines of having executive privilege or something.Can someone explain why Peter Navarro thought he did not have to comply with the subpoena?
These people seem to think invoking executive privilege to evade legal obligation is like waving garlic in front of a vampire.I think he was trying to go with the lines of having executive privilege or something.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?