• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

NATO can't ignore the Russian military's faster, more dangerous kill chain (1 Viewer)

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
106,198
Reaction score
96,543
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent

4.27.25

Russia's kill chain, or how quickly the army moves from finding a target to firing on it, is now far more responsive and precise than it was at the start of the war in Ukraine. Federico Borsari, a resident fellow researching war technology and innovation at the Center for European Policy Analysis, told Business Insider that "the Russians are adapting, and this is definitely something that NATO is noticing." Russia is outpacing the West in artillery production, raising the prospect that NATO must deter an adversary with more battlefield firepower and the fleets of reconnaissance drones that guide it. One of the more serious problems for Russia early in the conflict was that the time between finding a target and firing on it was far too slow. It took hours for indirect fires like artillery and mortars, and even longer for cruise missiles. Borsari wrote in a report published in early April that Russian strikes were sometimes delayed by up to four hours, making them ineffective against Ukrainian units that had long since moved on to a new position. "In the case of the tactical ballistic missile, this was very much the case," he told BI. "Sometimes, it took even longer."

Now, Russia uses a wide range of tactical drones to acquire targets in Ukraine, flooding the airspace with hundreds of observer systems at different altitudes and depths. Sometimes, these ISR platforms can work together to feed Russian commanders different visual angles of the same target. As the Kremlin started to surge drone production, what was a scarce resource in the early invasion soon became the backbone of Russia's reconnaissance. In 2023, Moscow's state media outlet TASS reported that Russia had increased its supply of the Orlan drone by more than 50 times. Insufficient Ukrainian air defenses have also given Russia more freedom of maneuverability with its bigger recon drones, allowing it to collect intelligence on Ukrainian operations in the rear and conduct effective strikes reminiscent of the HIMARS strikes that proved tremendously effective against the Russians. With the drones providing Russia a better view of the battlespace, it's been increasingly using short-range ballistic missiles like the Iskander-M and its devastating glide bombs to hit high-value targets in the Ukrainian rear more precisely. NATO should expect a more experienced Russia ready to fight with precision. "This is important for the British Army and its allies," he wrote, "as the available evidence indicates that Russia has moved away from the Soviet roots that informed its counter-battery doctrine, toward one that is precise, lethal, and operable at scale." Borsari said a more immediate action the US and Europe can take is targeting Russia's manufacturing for high-tech drones and precision munitions, which often rely on parts from overseas.

Drones are changing the dynamics of modern warfare, in the land, air, and sea battle-spaces.

The Russian fighting force of today is much improved from that of the Soviet-model military force that invaded Ukraine en-masse in early 2022.
 



Drones are changing the dynamics of modern warfare, in the land, air, and sea battle-spaces.

The Russian fighting force of today is much improved from that of the Soviet-model military force that invaded Ukraine en-masse in early 2022.
More's the pity. We should offer more advanced weaponry to Ukraine, including more sophisticated jamming equipment, satellite recon and F-16s.
 
Rogue Valley:

A good article. Thanks for posting it.

NATO better wake up and adapt to the fact that Russians are relearning how to fight effectively in the 21st Century battlespace and to adjust their tactics and operational planning accordingly. The West (perhaps without US support) should be supporting Ukraine militarily with arms, munitions and financial aid while NATO countries retrain and rebuild their militaries with an eye to confronting Russia directly first over and then in Ukraine with conventional forces. The Trump-US attempted realignment with Russia has become too dangerous to just supply Ukraine with what it needs to wear down the Russians. A European-Russian war in and around Ukraine now seems far more likely than a year ago. Canada should be immediately going on a wartime-production footing to supply Ukraine and Europe with weapons and munitions to prepare for that more likely war. We should be building European weapon systems under licence here to supply Europe, Ukraine and ourselves on a WWII production level scale. Canada should withdraw from the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty citing threats from both Russia in the Arctic and from the United States to our south and after the three month waiting period start supplying itself and Ukraine with nuclear munitions, and both chemical and biological weapons as deterrents to prevent Russia from easily transitioning to NBC warfare when Europeans become directly involved in the war. Canada cannot yet produce state of the art delivery systems as we relearn that quickly - but the Europeans can.

We are back in 1937 and we must move very fast and with determination and bloody-minded resolve to be prepared for the storms to come.

Be well, be safe and may the fates or gods help us all.
Evilroddy.
 



Drones are changing the dynamics of modern warfare, in the land, air, and sea battle-spaces.

The Russian fighting force of today is much improved from that of the Soviet-model military force that invaded Ukraine en-masse in early 2022.

Yeah but if Russia were to fight NATO, it would face:

1. Electronic warfare
2. Significantly better counter-battery fire.
 
Russians have learned and adapted well but they're not the only smart guys in this war.

Europeans and Ukrainians -- who are always smarter and wealthier together than Russians could dream of becoming -- have held off the Russians for three years to become joined in new weapons and funding synergies that are redefining allied warfighting in Europe-Eurasia.



After decades of peace, Europe is rapidly bolstering its defenses amid waning US support and renewed threats from Russian President Vladimir Putin. European countries are shifting their strategy when it comes to Ukraine, aiming to boost the country's capacity to produce enough weapons for its own defense rather than handing over ready-made weapons from their own depleting stockpiles. In March, the European Union said that half of a €2 billion aid package, taken from frozen Russian assets, was being earmarked specifically to help Ukraine boost its own artillery production, the largest package of its kind to date.


Ukraine is also now a world leader in the development and production of cheap UAV drones,
which have become ubiquitous weapons on the battlefield. We've become the biggest drone manufacturer in the world, drones of tactical and strategic level," Rustem Umerov, Ukraine's defense minister, said in February. And as BI's Jake Epstein reported, Ukraine's drone makers aren't just building weapons — they are rewriting the rules of modern warfare at a pace and scale that few could have imagined only a few years ago. Jacob Parakilas, research leader for Defence Strategy, Policy and Capabilities at RAND Europe, told BI "These approaches can happen simultaneously, and ideally produces synergies, with Ukrainian experience informing European understanding of the state of the art, while European money supports Ukrainian industry."



Ukraine is not our Spanish Civil War however. Unlike Stalin's USSR in Spain against Hitler's fascists, Putin's joining of His Beloved USSR oligarchy and fascism is a fail. And although new weapons systems are common to each conflict, Europe -- and the USA until Trump and MagaMericanFascism -- have been much stronger in support of Ukraine than either was in the Spanish Civil War. Plus and until now, this war is more akin to the trenches of World War I than of the increasingly technological 21st century air war that Ukraine is rapidly becoming.
 
Ukraine is not our Spanish Civil War however. Unlike Stalin's USSR in Spain against Hitler's fascists, Putin's joining of His Beloved USSR oligarchy and fascism is a fail. And although new weapons systems are common to each conflict, Europe -- and the USA until Trump and MagaMericanFascism -- have been much stronger in support of Ukraine than either was in the Spanish Civil War. Plus and until now, this war is more akin to the trenches of World War I than of the increasingly technological 21st century air war that Ukraine is rapidly becoming.

No, it's more like the 1939/40 Finnish-Soviet "Winter War", or the 1939 German invasion of Poland.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom