• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

National Firearms Act of 1932 is a violation of the Second Amendment

National Firearms Act of 1932 is a violation of the Second Amendment

  • Yes, the NFA needs to be struck down

    Votes: 2 100.0%
  • No, the NFA is good gun regulation

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other, specify below

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    2

swing_voter

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
13,042
Reaction score
8,465
Location
'Murica
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Independent
Banned by the National Firearms Act of 1932
  1. A shotgun having a barrel or barrels of less than 18 inches in length;
  2. A weapon made from a shotgun if such weapon as modified has an overall length of less than 26 inches or a barrel or barrels of less than 18 inches in length;
  3. A rifle having a barrel or barrels of less than 16 inches in length;
  4. A weapon made from a rifle if such weapon as modified has an overall length of less than 26 inches or a barrel or barrels of less than 16 inches in length;
  5. Any other weapon, as defined in subsection (e);
  6. A machinegun;
  7. Any silencer (as defined in section 921 of title 18, United States Code); and
  8. A destructive device.

If the militia is a military unit and the Federalist Papers says a militia is a military unit, then the militia needs access to #6 and #8 if it wants to face a modern adversary.

One of the biggest threats to the Constitution according to Hamilton and Madison is the US Army. How is a modern militia supposed to fight the US Army without full auto weapons and things like hand grenades?



.
 
Damn, we need to dig up everyone involved in writing that act and shoot them!
 
Banned by the National Firearms Act of 1932
  1. A shotgun having a barrel or barrels of less than 18 inches in length;
  2. A weapon made from a shotgun if such weapon as modified has an overall length of less than 26 inches or a barrel or barrels of less than 18 inches in length;
  3. A rifle having a barrel or barrels of less than 16 inches in length;
  4. A weapon made from a rifle if such weapon as modified has an overall length of less than 26 inches or a barrel or barrels of less than 16 inches in length;
  5. Any other weapon, as defined in subsection (e);
  6. A machinegun;
  7. Any silencer (as defined in section 921 of title 18, United States Code); and
  8. A destructive device.

If the militia is a military unit and the Federalist Papers says a militia is a military unit, then the militia needs access to #6 and #8 if it wants to face a modern adversary.

One of the biggest threats to the Constitution according to Hamilton and Madison is the US Army. How is a modern militia supposed to fight the US Army without full auto weapons and things like hand grenades?.

Why wouldn't the militia need access to all of them ?
 
Back
Top Bottom