• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Nathan Wade Admitted Mulltiple White House Meetings During Trump Georgia Probe, Transcript suggests

A

Athanasius68

DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 27, 2016
Messages
36,578
Reaction score
8,429
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Couple of things:

1. He admits he was not qualified to run the prosecution. He had to go to 'RICO school' in order to learn the various nuances of the Georgia RICO Act.

So it's pretty clear Willis hired him because he was her boyfriend.
She needs to go.

2. He said that Willis began pulling together the prosecution before the Jan 6 riot.
Which runs into the next:


3. He had meetings with White House officials, not DOJ officials (which perhaps would be understandable), but WH officials, including on the very day Smith was named Special Prosecutor.

There is no reason for him to be meeting with political operatives of the Biden/Harris administration.

 
Athanasius68 said:
Couple of things:

1. He admits he was not qualified to run the prosecution. He had to go to 'RICO school' in order to learn the various nuances of the Georgia RICO Act.

So it's pretty clear Willis hired him because he was her boyfriend.
She needs to go.

2. He said that Willis began pulling together the prosecution before the Jan 6 riot.
Which runs into the next:


3. He had meetings with White House officials, not DOJ officials (which perhaps would be understandable), but WH officials, including on the very day Smith was named Special Prosecutor.

There is no reason for him to be meeting with political operatives of the Biden/Harris administration.

Click to expand...
Willis had meeting at the White House with the Biden administration.

Seems the same pattern in Jack Smith's case:

Biden staffers met with Special Counsel Jack Smith’s aides before Trump indictment​

nypost.com

Exclusive | Biden staffers met with Special Counsel Jack Smith’s aides before Trump indictment

The White House counsel’s office met with a top aide to Special Counsel Jack Smith just weeks before he brought charges against Trump.
nypost.com nypost.com

and also a connection to the Biden administration in the NY case.

Trump prosecutor quit top DOJ post for lowly NY job in likely bid to ‘get’ former president, expert says​

www.yahoo.com

Trump prosecutor quit top DOJ post for lowly NY job in likely bid to ‘get’ former president, expert says

Matthew Colangelo, a key member of Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg's team prosecuting President Trump, was once a senior official in the Biden Justice Department.
www.yahoo.com www.yahoo.com

Anyone else here detecting a pattern? The pattern that all these roads lead back to the Biden administration? Hmm.
 
Athanasius68 said:
Couple of things:

1. He admits he was not qualified to run the prosecution. He had to go to 'RICO school' in order to learn the various nuances of the Georgia RICO Act.

So it's pretty clear Willis hired him because he was her boyfriend.
She needs to go.

2. He said that Willis began pulling together the prosecution before the Jan 6 riot.
Which runs into the next:


3. He had meetings with White House officials, not DOJ officials (which perhaps would be understandable), but WH officials, including on the very day Smith was named Special Prosecutor.

There is no reason for him to be meeting with political operatives of the Biden/Harris administration.

Click to expand...
When you can't win at the ballot box, the Democrats went to lawfare which has failed miserably.
 
NOLA Dude said:
When you can't win at the ballot box, the Democrats went to lawfare
Click to expand...
Apparently.

NOLA Dude said:
which has failed miserably.
Click to expand...
Thanks goodness.
Not on Trump's behalf, on behalf of the entire nation, which appears to have a legal system which isn't bent to serve political agendas, ideologies and political objectives, although some apparently have tried to do so.
 
Just another Republican Witch Hunt that seems to have nothing to do with whether Trump is Guilty or innocent.
Most of us that felt that this needed to looked at by a jury in a court of law did so because of the things said out of his own mouth. We didn't think that a court needed to look at this because of what MSNBC or CNN or any other news source. We decided based on the things we actually heard and saw Trump say with his own mouth on live TV tapes of him talking and taped phone calls. Remember why these tapes were made public. It was because Trump lied about the conversations on National TV so Raffensperger released the tapes to show that Trump was lying. Again, how do we know Trump lied? Not because of "left wing" media but because we heard him lie. The whole country that doesn't listen exclusively to Fox heard Trump tell his exactly how many votes he needed Raffensperger to get for him. Not the only self incriminating thing we saw and heard Trump say.
All the right comes back with are extraneous things that have nothing to do with proving Trump's innocence but rather just sends up a smoke screen.
 
NOLA Dude said:
When you can't win at the ballot box, the Democrats went to lawfare which has failed miserably.
Click to expand...
The difference is amazing. Most of the beliefs of the left are because of things we actually saw Trump say with his own mouth. When the left media says that Trump did or said something they show tape of his actually doing or saying what they reported. When the left reports about his trials and the facts of those trials they actually show the court filings, depositions, transcripts, etc. of the proceeding. The right wing media do none of this because it would get in the way of the narrative they are feeding their viewers . How often has Fox told us Trump was in court for frivolous things while never showing the court documents that say what he was actually being tried for. Also before and after the court time Trump et al get to make up whatever they want to, simply because their viewers will never be given access to the actual court proceedings so they will never even know they are being lied to. It's amazing the lengths that Trump's minions will go to just to make sure that they aren't exposed to anything but the right wing oracles. By the time they ever hear the truth they are so locked into the lie that it doesn't matter.
Again for the most part the left makes up it's mind based on things they have actually seen or heard first hand. The whole concept of right wing news has always centered around providing what to believe rather than providing news and letting them make up their own minds. Even back when Fox did have actual news reporting most of their viewers ignored it and just watched the Opinion guys tell then what to believe and why.
 
Mike1950 said:
Most of us that felt that this needed to looked at by a jury in a court of law
Click to expand...
Mike1950 said:
did so because of the things said out of his own mouth. We didn't think that a court needed to look at this because of what MSNBC or CNN or any other news source. We decided based on the things we actually heard and saw Trump say with his own mouth on live TV tapes of him talking and taped phone calls. Remember why these tapes were made public. It was because Trump lied about the conversations on National TV so Raffensperger released the tapes to show that Trump was lying. Again, how do we know Trump lied? Not because of "left wing" media but because we heard him lie. The whole country that doesn't listen exclusively to Fox heard Trump tell his exactly how many votes he needed Raffensperger to get for him. Not the only self incriminating thing we saw and heard Trump say.
All the right comes back with are extraneous things that have nothing to do with proving Trump's innocence but rather just sends up a smoke screen.
Click to expand...

Fair enough.
But then it would need to be a REAL trial and not a show trial.
Where the defendant due process rights are paramount. Where the prosecutor makes decisions based upon law and not politics.
 
Athanasius68 said:
Fair enough.
But then it would need to be a REAL trial and not a show trial.
Where the defendant due process rights are paramount. Where the prosecutor makes decisions based upon law and not politics.
Click to expand...
Yeah, billionaires usually have it stacked against them in the courtroom…
 
Athanasius68 said:
Fair enough.
But then it would need to be a REAL trial and not a show trial.
Where the defendant due process rights are paramount. Where the prosecutor makes decisions based upon law and not politics.
Click to expand...
It might help if you state what trial you are talking about. Then quote the documents or sources that lend credence to any of what you are claiming. Right now you are doing just what I was referring to.
 
Athanasius68 said:
There is no standard where walthier Americans have less an expectation of justice than poorer Americans.
Click to expand...
They have far more of an expectation of justice due to the financial resources they have available for their defense. How deep in a cult do you have to be to convince yourself a billionaire doesn’t get a fair trial.
 
Athanasius68 said:
There is no standard where walthier Americans have less an expectation of justice than poorer Americans.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I heard about all those billionaires in jail — not.

The point is that the monied crust hire the best lawyers that assure that they aren’t treated worse than the poor person only able to get Legal Aid.
 
Athanasius68 said:
There is no standard where walthier Americans have less an expectation of justice than poorer Americans.
Click to expand...
Do you live in the real world?
Everyone except maybe the members of the orange cult understands that wealthier Americans have a tiered legal system bent in their favor.
 
Let me ask y’all this, a billionaire catches his wife in bed with another man and kills them both. A man that earns minimum wage catches his wife in bed with another man and kills them both. Which one is more likely to go to prison?
 
We are way too easy on White collar crime. It is a much more destructive force than most realize. This is especially true as a direct correlation as to how much money the white collar criminal has. Trump is a perfect example of this. For years while he was a liberal it was common knowledge that he got away with all kinds of crimes simply because money made it more trouble than it was worth to hold him accountable. It is strange that when he was a liberal, liberals liberals had no use for him. After all he was a lying, cheating, adulterer, low life. Then he becomes a conservative and the right adored him for the same things the left detested him for. There's a moral in all that somewhere if you look closely.
 
Athanasius68 said:
There is no standard where walthier Americans have less an expectation of justice than poorer Americans.
Click to expand...
Disagree wholeheartedly. You and I would already be in prison for the documents case alone. Arguing Trump has less justice is a joke.
 
Athanasius68 said:
Couple of things:

1. He admits he was not qualified to run the prosecution. He had to go to 'RICO school' in order to learn the various nuances of the Georgia RICO Act.

So it's pretty clear Willis hired him because he was her boyfriend.
She needs to go.

2. He said that Willis began pulling together the prosecution before the Jan 6 riot.
Which runs into the next:


3. He had meetings with White House officials, not DOJ officials (which perhaps would be understandable), but WH officials, including on the very day Smith was named Special Prosecutor.

There is no reason for him to be meeting with political operatives of the Biden/Harris administration.

Click to expand...
🥱🥱🥱
 
Athanasius68 said:
Couple of things:

1. He admits he was not qualified to run the prosecution. He had to go to 'RICO school' in order to learn the various nuances of the Georgia RICO Act.

So it's pretty clear Willis hired him because he was her boyfriend.
She needs to go.

2. He said that Willis began pulling together the prosecution before the Jan 6 riot.
Click to expand...
The J-6th insurrection was the final act of the attempted coup. She was looking at the entire coup plot that started before the election itself.
Athanasius68 said:
Which runs into the next:


3. He had meetings with White House officials, not DOJ officials (which perhaps would be understandable), but WH officials, including on the very day Smith was named Special Prosecutor.

There is no reason for him to be meeting with political operatives of the Biden/Harris administration.

Click to expand...
For all the rest of this nonsense, there are many logical reasons for speaking with WH officials. One big one being all the documents left from the prior admin.
 
Athanasius68 said:
There is no standard where walthier Americans have less an expectation of justice than poorer Americans.
Click to expand...
Not true. Trump and his DoJ put one intelligence contractor in jail for 5 years for possessing one document. Held her without bail and rammed her into prison.
He did that because she exposed some bad shit about him.

Trump had hundreds of classified documents and obstructed justice in the process. He's free, with his charges dismissed, so far.
 
anything to beat Trump

that's been the 8 year plan running
 
  • Like
Reactions: PoS
ALiberalModerate said:
Let me ask y’all this, a billionaire catches his wife in bed with another man and kills them both. A man that earns minimum wage catches his wife in bed with another man and kills them both. Which one is more likely to go to prison?
Click to expand...

I don't like that example but I get what point you're trying to make.

It's not subjective but it's objectively true rich people gets to bend the laws more than poor people.
 
Mike1950 said:
The difference is amazing. Most of the beliefs of the left are because of things we actually saw Trump say with his own mouth. When the left media says that Trump did or said something they show tape of his actually doing or saying what they reported. When the left reports about his trials and the facts of those trials they actually show the court filings, depositions, transcripts, etc. of the proceeding. The right wing media do none of this because it would get in the way of the narrative they are feeding their viewers . How often has Fox told us Trump was in court for frivolous things while never showing the court documents that say what he was actually being tried for. Also before and after the court time Trump et al get to make up whatever they want to, simply because their viewers will never be given access to the actual court proceedings so they will never even know they are being lied to. It's amazing the lengths that Trump's minions will go to just to make sure that they aren't exposed to anything but the right wing oracles. By the time they ever hear the truth they are so locked into the lie that it doesn't matter.
Again for the most part the left makes up it's mind based on things they have actually seen or heard first hand. The whole concept of right wing news has always centered around providing what to believe rather than providing news and letting them make up their own minds. Even back when Fox did have actual news reporting most of their viewers ignored it and just watched the Opinion guys tell then what to believe and why.
Click to expand...

This is what I don't understand about Trumpers. They blame the media for his bad coverage yet all his coverage are bad cause it's documented on what he says.
 
Yes the left formed it's feelings about Trump directly from what we see him say. His own words out of his own mouth. The rights view of Harris is based completely on what Trump, Fox and their followers say about her.
A Great example is how Trump told us over and over that he was telling the Justice Department to investigate his political enemies. We heard him say that he told them to investigate Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, Robert Mueller, multiple people in the FBI that pissed him off. He told them to investigate all kinds of stuff concerning his election loss. The list of people and things that Trump told us that he ordered the DOJ to investigate goes on and on. Again all of this we see him say out of his own mouth. Then the right tells us that Biden is doing these types of things. They of course can't point to anything he has said to make them think this, we have to just take their word for it. This is just one example of all kinds of things that we know about. We also have a long list of people and things Trump is already telling us (again out of his own mouth) that he will have the DOJ go after.
 
Athanasius68 said:
He admits he was not qualified to run the prosecution. He had to go to 'RICO school' in order to learn the various nuances of the Georgia RICO Act.
Click to expand...


Pretty sure the other male attorney on the team - it was Wade, some other dude, and then a female attorney - is the RICO specialist. This is a nothingburger. My boss doesn't need to be an expert in project/program management - that's MY job.

Next you're gonna tell me that Phil Jackson wasn't as good a basketball player as Michael Jordan! Impossible!



:rolleyes:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom