Nothing has been proved???
People voted in more than one precinct in more than one state.
People that were dead... voted.
Both of those things have been proven.
Nothing in what I said had anything to do with voter ID.
I think if you were to read my other posts on this board, and talk to many of the other members, you would find that I am one of the least partisan people on this forum.
In other words, your blatant denial of the facts in the reports of the findings, is Blindly Partisan, by saying nothing has been proven.
Not a good start for a new member here.
Please explain, someone - how does one get from my statement, "we have only charges but no proof" to the following?How many voted in two separate precincts? When the same charges were laid two years ago in South Carolina, investigation found more than half of the supposed dual voters were due to clerical errors. We have people with the same names, we have people who moved from one district to another and didn't tell the old registrar they no longer lived in the district. South Carolina found almost everyone of the "dead" voters were cases of sons with the same names as their deceased fathers.
At this time NOTHING has been proven, the elections board has found names that seem to indicate voter fraud but until every single scrap of paper is gone over, checking signatures and verifying that there were no mistakes, we have only charges but no proof.
So you'd be fine with ignoring all this regardless of the truth that may be found if it hasn't already? Good to know. Let's just dismiss anything found so that the status quo remains. Except, I would prefer that my vote not be wiped out by one of these people and disenfranchise me; that is if you don't mind.
Another absolute bull**** story from a FAR RIGHT rag. Keep trying, guys. It keeps you from doing something that really might be dangerous, such as crafting a message that appeals to people other than old white guys.
How many voted in two separate precincts? When the same charges were laid two years ago in South Carolina, investigation found more than half of the supposed dual voters were due to clerical errors. We have people with the same names, we have people who moved from one district to another and didn't tell the old registrar they no longer lived in the district. South Carolina found almost everyone of the "dead" voters were cases of sons with the same names as their deceased fathers.
At this time NOTHING has been proven, the elections board has found names that seem to indicate voter fraud but until every single scrap of paper is gone over, checking signatures and verifying that there were no mistakes, we have only charges but no proof.
political porn does no one any good. Its pretty easy to find lies, fabrications and wack-a-doo theories on the Internet....
Boston Air Traffic Controller Says 9/11 An Inside Job
... just because you find some article does not mean its true. If you can't find a story from a mainstream source, it probably is not true. Keep your smut to yourself....
You actually believe the bs the mainstream outlets cover? You know they are highly controlled in the area of political correspondence, right? I suppose you think we are doing Ukraine a favor also? Since that is what the MSM is spewing out. Utter garbage the MSM is. The satire of John Stewart is more accurate than those talking heads.
Pray tell, why are Republican governed states cutting voting times by eliminating early voting days and weekend voting - days when low income workers have the time to stand in line to vote?
Why have Republican legislatures decided to refuse to accept state university photo IDs?
Why have Republican states made absentee voting easier? Many of the cases of dual votes have been the result of mailed in ballots followed up by in-person voting
When it is pointed out that the laws being passed impact demographic groups which traditionally vote Democratic, the Republican response has been "Yeah, so what!" Turzai: Voter ID Law Means Romney Can Win in PA | PoliticsPA
It is not the "charges of voter fraud" that piss off Democrats, it is the laws being passed which directly affect many voters without actual justification. In every instance investigated to date, all in Republican states, the results have failed to support the charges of wide-spread voter fraud.
Well it is kinda like crappin' on their last bowl of corn flakes.Well asking someone for a ID to vote pisses you people off too.Yes, the charges of voter fraud piss Democrats off like nothing else apparently.
But the two, I'm sure are NOT related......maybe.
When someone gets convicted in court come back and tell us all about it.
"Better days are coming." ~ But not for today's out of touch, running out of time, GOP.
North Carolina was the only state that reports voter fraud and the only swing state that went to Romney and the governorship went to a republicon for the first time in 20 years and the republicons picked up three seats in the house.
Yeah. Let's take a look at NY: Voter Fraud: We
Convict those who won through voter fraud... the republicons!How do you convict dead people?
Rather typical right-wing hyperbole combined with outright lies and/or simply being unable to read.
61 votes were cast by the investigators using the names of dead voters: The Board of Health had failed to notify the Board of Elections in 39 of the cases, wrong middle names and incorrect spelling meant 10 other deceased had not been removed from the rolls of voters. Twelve dead people voted, not a good number but not as bad as the right is screaming about. Even with photo ID, that means you could have had 49 dead people voting, never mind the problem with absentee ballots.
Another absolute bull**** story from a FAR RIGHT rag. Keep trying, guys. It keeps you from doing something that really might be dangerous, such as crafting a message that appeals to people other than old white guys.
Yeah. Let's take a look at NY: Voter Fraud: We
Again, potential cases. Apparently nobody has told you guys that the vast majority of cases investigated turn out to not actually be fraud.
Initial findings from the Board presented to the Joint Legislative Elections Oversight Committee Wednesday showed:
•765 voters with an exact match of first and last name, date of birth, and last four digits of the social security number were registered in N.C. and another state, and voted in N.C. and the other state in the 2012 general election.
•35,750 voters with the same first and last name and date of birth were registered in N.C. and another state, and voted in both states in the 2012 general election.
:roll: Yeah, anecdotes, that will win the argument for you.
What part of partial would you file this under?
My anecdotes are as good as anybody else's, especially those including vague dismissals which don't address any substantive points. Naturally, for those of a particular disposition, no objective will be met by doing such a thing.
Better question: assuming 100% of these are actual fraud, how many of these votes would have been stopped by voter ID?
http://voterintegrityproject.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/JointCommittee_April-2014.pdf
Here's a pdf which outlines the multi state voter integrity project. I'd start on page 32 for an explaination of the states that are participating, page 35 displays their findings which are described on the ABC news site and page 39 has legislated requests authored by the board of elections. Have fun.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?