- Joined
- Jul 3, 2019
- Messages
- 48,520
- Reaction score
- 41,768
- Location
- Ohio
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
Is the well an idea of Christian faith?
Is the well an idea of Christian faith?No you haven't you've done as is your custom, that is claim to have shown evidence when in fact you have not.
You said "by pointing out most of it is factually incorrect."
I pointed out that Joseph's Well is referred to by the book of John and that the well exists, thus confirming that on that point the book is in agreement with what we know, you have not pointed out a single "factual error".
Yes, it does — entirely.It doesn't matter if they do or don't. That doesn't change the essence of what you're trying to say.
Does this involve gossip? Because if not, I have to go, got bigger gossiping fish to fry.Who, oh teller of tales?
of course I've done that. The majority of the bible is factually incorrect.
What idea or claim is the bible can be proven factually correct by someone who isn't a member of any of the 3 Abrahamic religions without the use of faith or belief?The majority of your posts are factually incorrect.
What idea or claim is the bible can be proven factually correct by someone who isn't a member of any of the 3 Abrahamic religions without the use of faith or belief?
The central idea of Jesus as the son of God is still very much unsupported factually.
Is the well an idea of Christian faith?
I'm asking you because you made the claim that the bible mentions the well and the well supposedly exists. Is that well's existence a central idea to the Christian faith?Are you asking me a question? if so what exactly are you asking me?
If it were correct then the claim could be corroborated by multiple 3rd party courses and factually proven to be true.If it were supported factually, how might that support look to us?
I'm asking you because you made the claim that the bible mentions the well and the well supposedly exists. Is that well's existence a central idea to the Christian faith?
If it were correct then the claim could be corroborated by multiple 3rd party courses and factually proven to be true.
Still waiting for an answer to this:Coincidence in evolution? A logical development of a fish? Eels are smarted than humans?
If it were correct then the claim could be corroborated by multiple 3rd party courses and factually proven to be true.If it were supported factually, how might that support look to us?
There is no proof that Jesus as the son of god ever existed. We have written records far older from Egypt, China, and India, plus Mesopotamia and yet there is only 2nd hand mentions of Jesus from people who got those claims from believers. The Romans were excellent record keepers and if someone actually rose from the dead there would be first-hand accounts recorded. There is nothing outside the bible to say that he rose from the dead or performed any miracles. The idea of a dying and rising savior born of a virgin birth is a very old religious idea.Depends who you ask, Christ does draw the analogy between drinking liquid water from a well and drinking spiritual water from a him, so it has a symbolic significance.
Yes but tell me what would such proof look like to us? what would you regard as "factual" proof for a claim that purportedly happened 2,000 years ago?
Other than creating a written record of it, what could the people, witnesses at the time, do to make sure people thousands of years later knew it was true?
What would you have done, if you'd seen Christ rise from the dead or turn water into wine? what steps could you take to ensure people knew this happened even 2,000 years in the future from you?
Then you should have no problem demonstrating which posts are incorrect.The majority of your posts are factually incorrect.
Depends who you ask, Christ does draw the analogy between drinking liquid water from a well and drinking spiritual water from a him, so it has a symbolic significance.
Yes but tell me what would such proof look like to us? what would you regard as "factual" proof for a claim that purportedly happened 2,000 years ago?
Other than creating a written record of it, what could the people, witnesses at the time, do to make sure people thousands of years later knew it was true?
What would you have done, if you'd seen Christ rise from the dead or turn water into wine? what steps could you take to ensure people knew this happened even 2,000 years in the future from you?
Has anyone seen Sherlock Holmes and Angel post at exactly the same time?
If it were correct then the claim could be corroborated by multiple 3rd party courses and factually proven to be true.
There is no proof that Jesus as the son of god ever existed. We have written records far older from Egypt, China, and India, plus Mesopotamia and yet there is only 2nd hand mentions of Jesus from people who got those claims from believers. The Romans were excellent record keepers and if someone actually rose from the dead there would be first-hand accounts recorded.
There is nothing outside the bible to say that he rose from the dead or performed any miracles. The idea of a dying and rising savior born of a virgin birth is a very old religious idea.
Depends who you ask, Christ does draw the analogy between drinking liquid water from a well and drinking spiritual water from a him, so it has a symbolic significance.
Yes but tell me what would such proof look like to us? what would you regard as "factual" proof for a claim that purportedly happened 2,000 years ago?
Other than creating a written record of it, what could the people, witnesses at the time, do to make sure people thousands of years later knew it was true?
What would you have done, if you'd seen Christ rise from the dead or turn water into wine? what steps could you take to ensure people knew this happened even 2,000 years in the future from you?
History is not determined by simply evidence provided by the written word from one source, especially a source with an apparent purpose to promote a religious belief. Where are the personal writings of jesus? Where are personal writings of anyone from that time.
In addition, where are the artefacts from that time which support the bible story?
Are all bible stories literally true? How do you tell the difference? Are all the stories in all the religious texts ever written literally true? How can you tell?
Any stories which claim remarkable things should be treated with skepticism. Why? Because there has never been any documented evidence of such things occurring today.
Perhaps you'd care to answer a question (for a change): what would you have done if you had witnessed Christ turning water into wine and other miracles? what would you have done to ensure people thousands of years later were made aware of these events?
Well, if that surprised you, just wait until you get a load of this.Coincidence in evolution? A logical development of a fish? Eels are smarted than humans?
Sorry, but your game is silly. People write things for many reasons. In this case, they wrote something to promote a belief.
Perhaps you'd care to answer a question (for a change): what would you have done if you had witnessed Christ turning water into wine and other miracles? what would you have done to ensure people thousands of years later were made aware of these events?
Everything that shows you for what you truly are is silly isn't it David.
Too terrified to answer a very reasonable hypothetical question because you know you're defeated, your "logic" is vacuous.
Here's all I asked and you get upset at the prospect of answering, we both know why:
Trapped you didn't I !
, I eat atheists like you for breakfast and spit out the bones,
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?