- Joined
- Apr 29, 2012
- Messages
- 17,875
- Reaction score
- 8,366
- Location
- On an island. Not that one!
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Socialist
A little authoritarian there buddy, take a chill pill. The source is the their own holy literature. what would you like to see?
Once the Sacred Months are past, (and they refuse to make peace) you may kill the idol worshipers when you encounter them, punish them, and resist every move they make.
You can put Snopes where the snopes don't shine. Why don't you tell me what 15 Muslim men are doing in a remote area?
I suppose you are referring to Sura 9:5
Then there is the verse saying kill witches -- You shall not permit a female sorcerer to live.
Does that indicate Male sorcerers are acceptable, just not those icky female ones?
or this one: “Put your sword on your side, each of you! Go back and forth from gate to gate throughout the camp, and each of you kill your brother, your friend, and your neighbour.”’
and this one: Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known a man by sleeping with him. But all the young girls who have not known a man by sleeping with him, keep alive for yourselves.
Each of the 164 Jihad verses in this list was selected based on how clearly and directly it spoke about Jihad, at least when considered in its immediate context. Most of the listed passages mention a military expedition, fighting, or distributing war spoils. Verses NOT generally listed are those that speak about aspects of Jihad other than the raiding, fighting and looting, such as:
Muhammad's poor opinion of those who did not go on Jihad, even though they were able-bodied and able financially (for instance, some verses in K 009:081-096),
The heavenly rewards for Jihadists, and
The many generic mentions of "victory" found in the Koran.
A lot of facts she speaks come from the Koran. How can the Islamics own words and actions not be facts? Credibility is diminished by orgs. lik eCAIR and the SPLC.
But those two groups, themselves, are left wing hate groups. As I said, the doctrine speaks for itself. And when someone tells you what it says(Islamic doctrine) they are haters.
That you refuse to admit that devout Muslims hate the kafirs guts demonstrates how emasculated the left truly is.
Exposing the hatred of others, as the SPLC does, does not make you a "left wing hate group". If the right wing nutjobs would not make so many hateful and discriminatory statements, the SPLC would have nothing to report upon, but sadly that is not the way the irrational right thinks.
Exposing the hatred of others, as the SPLC does, does not make you a "left wing hate group". If the right wing nutjobs would not make so many hateful and discriminatory statements, the SPLC would have nothing to report upon, but sadly that is not the way the irrational right thinks.
It really does freak me out sometimes how RWNJs can seriously claim the SPLC is a "hate group."
How much is over reactive? Profiling is not over reaction it is caution and common sense.
And no, I haven't been here before. Is this forum in the habit of getting rid of people you and others don't like?
Whether I am liked, or not, means 0. It doesn't change the harsh reality of Islams menance to the free world.
How do you know that? The doctrine of Islam leaves you no way to tell. In fact, devout Muslims are most likely to support jihad anyway they can.
Did the Muslims in Brussels hide the terrorist just captured for months? Does the collection in the mosques go to jihad? It says it does in the holy literature. So many things you see are exactly what anyone can read. Try it.
the most frequently articulated descriptions of jihad included references to one's "duty toward God," a "divine duty," or a "worship of God" -- with no explicit militaristic connotation at all.
There is no simple way to quantitatively summarize the full diversity of the verbatim replies we received to this open-ended question. However, in addition to the two broader groupings mentioned above, personal definitions also included (in roughly decreasing order of frequency) references to:
"a commitment to hard work" and "achieving one's goals in life"
"struggling to achieve a noble cause"
"promoting peace, harmony or cooperation, and assisting others" (interesting, in light of jihad's more frequently ascribed meaning)
and to simply "living the principles of Islam."
It really does freak me out sometimes how RWNJs can seriously claim the SPLC is a "hate group."
There are plenty of non right wing nut job hate groups that the Southern Poverty Law center refuses to expose and go after, and they have made it their mission to attack conservative groups where ever possible. The SPLC was used as a resource by the FBI for a time, but now the FBI distances itself from them. Why is that?
I am not twisting anything. Granted the article was not totally true, but the problems with Islam are. And that is what I am trying to get across. And a reaction like yours is what they want.
As far as an honest discussion, I have no problem discussing why Islam is dangerous and relentless.
Again I never argued that the story was totally true. But that there were weapons and Muslim men. Anything like that should be followed up on.
As far as Islamic doctrine I don't lie about that. And one thing the doctrine says it that there is no compromise, no treaty that will be honored if Islam concedes one thing.
How do you negotiate with that? Islam takes, it has from the beginning. And the hate you see comes from Islam not myself. If the Western world does not make it clear that freedom is what they want soon, forget about it. Did we fight Hitler? Did we use overpowering force? Check out Dresden.
To leave this for our children isn't going to work.
The greatest "encouragement" ever given terrorists was the passage of the Patriot Act. "Look Achmed, we've frightened them so much they abandon their famous constitution."
Really, the FBI wants nothing to do with the SPLC? Or is that what the right wing media has made you believe?
Ahhhh...another one that thinks every conservative is in lock step with the media.
A simple google will give you the facts. Also....I said "distance" not "nothing". The FBI is aware of some of the smear campaigns of the SLPC.
Ahhhh...another one that thinks every conservative is in lock step with the media.
A simple google will give you the facts. Also....I said "distance" not "nothing". The FBI is aware of some of the smear campaigns of the SLPC.
Blaming America now? Islam is 1400 years old. And has been defeated militarily many times. So how do you think they would have the means to mount and all out attack?
And do you realize the number totally ignorant of everything but Islam?
And the faith is an open book. But does someone with a closed mind no good, right?
Why do you think people would say such things without historical facts? There are many old texts that have recorded these atrocities. And I am sure your sources are versed in revisionism to promote multiculture. Which is a huge failure in Europe. Changing or lessening the history of Islam will not change the way the devout have acted, and still act to this day. Unlike Christian atrocities that ended long ago, and with much less of a death toll.
You posted as if it were true, you ignored the other subsequent sources where no middle eastern description was mentioned. There is zero evidence these were Muslim men. The sad truth is that you are much more likely to meet a group of white right wing survivalist extremist nationalist men than you are to meet a group of armed Muslim men in the United States.
You do not lie about Islam, you just misrepresent it and it's followers. Just like with everybody else there is no one size fits all description of Muslims, especially not your very anti-Islamic views on what Muslims represent. Islam does not take, politicians and political movements do. Just like Christianity does not take, but Christian based groups and voters do.
Your views on what Muslim is, just doesn't compute because if that is what Muslim was, there would be a world set ablaze right now as 1/3 of the worlds population (almost) is Muslim. But not even in Muslim countries is that the truth. Sure there are problems in loads of Muslim countries but not anything like you are trying to make it sound like.
try and separate 'christian' from Western. The Christian West has slaughtered millions of innocents in both WWI and WWII. You cite fighting Hitler but his nation was a CHRISTIAN nation and many thought they were superior to Jews and Slavs... :doh
We carpet bombed millions of women and children during WWII.
Stalin wasn't Muslim and he murdered millions- Pinochet prayed on Sunday and sent his death squads out on Monday. Argentina murdered over 30,000 fellow christians in their 'dirty war'. We sponsored death squads in El Salvador... Guatemala where the US back government killed roughly 50,000 of it's own people.
Did you forget about 'The Troubles' of Northern Ireland??? Protestants against Catholics????
How about our dear ally Ferdinand Marcos and his reign of terror under our protection???
Spain's dictator Franco's regime is listed as having murdered over 100,000 fellow Christians....
This ain't PC revisionism, it's Islamic hatred being EXTREMELY selective on 'remembering' the past...eace
I laugh when Islamaphobes
First it would be helpful if you commented in a recognizable language.
As to what ever point you were trying to make you clearly missed mine, whcih addressed you ludicrous suggestion that all of Islam is terrorist. Of course Islam has been defeated militarily, but that had not one thing to do with any part of the argument.
Now I will make it a clear as possible, using simple words. There are 1.6 billion Muslims in the world. If every one one of them were a terrorist, they would have won by now.
No, the faith is not an open book, everything you have said has been an outright lie.
I laugh when I hear that word too. That is a word designed to end a conversion. First of all what the Nazis did was not found in Christian doctrine. There is zero about attacking, killing, or making anyone submit. Do not blame the faith for the actions of madmen. Now the Islamic faith condones all those things if they advance Islam. And as far as madmen, Mohammad resembles that remark. And he is the perfect man. And he is to be emulated and imitated.
It says so over 90 times in the Koran.
And that is where they should stay. Next, how do I misrepresent Islam? Do you see what Muslims are doing? With all those people(Muslims) why don't they stop terror? Because it is believed in and supported. As far as the white nationalists. Who have they killed lately?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?