Media reports are that a new indictment is about to be announced from the Mueller investigation.
SPOILER: its not Trump.
When did Trump tell the intelligence' cyber security specialists to stand down ??
We've known since Obama was president that Russia was hacking and trying to influence our election. Is this the best Mueller can do after spending millions and millions of dollars, indict a bunch of Russians who will never be brought to trial for something we already knew in the first place? What an effing waste of both time and money.
when did he give the order to attack the Russians in the same way.....all of his Intelligence heads who were appointed by him gave testimony that he had not directed them to do this.....I think to protect is in the oath of office!!
Most of Europe has shiny new cyberdefense programs to deal with Russian attacks. Hillary said we should get one.
Like I said, you can keep your head where the sun doesn't shine, but you won't see much. And what you do see will be what one would expect.
Your quote was "1 American (yet unnamed) was mentioned as passing information to the Trump campaign."
The indictment didn't say that.
Your link didn't confirm that.
After saying you wanted to look at the facts you made one up.
Not admitting it is a bad way for a new member to start but a good way for one to establish a reputation.
The Witch hunt found it's coven of witches in Russia, and it will end as soon as we indict the witches here in America that conspired to work with the Russian Witches such as our president and certain other witches that either made up his campaign or advised his campaign!
Thanks for asking though! LOL!
It's just like Salem. The Obama Deep State is instilling fear and fake news to condemn Trump, because unlike Trump, Obama hated America and wanted to subjugate us to European Overlords. They're afraid Trump will make America Great Again, so they launched this witch Hunt to try to take him down.
When did Trump tell the intelligence' cyber security specialists to stand down ??
You have no response to my post, just more drivel and personal attacks.
He's supposed to lead, not interfere.
Where's the new program proposals? Why didn't he spend the money Congress sent him to get started (that he didn't ask for)?
No, they were doing pretty much the same thing in 2014 that they did in 2016. Had Hillary won, Russia would be a distant afterthought. It's only because the left can't come to grips with her terrible campaign and candidacy that this fiction of Russia winning the election for Trump has been pushed.
It's just like Salem. The Obama Deep State is instilling fear and fake news to condemn Trump, because unlike Trump, Obama hated America and wanted to subjugate us to European Overlords. They're afraid Trump will make America Great Again, so they launched this witch Hunt to try to take him down.
It's just like Salem. The Obama Deep State is instilling fear and fake news to condemn Trump, because unlike Trump, Obama hated America and wanted to subjugate us to European Overlords. They're afraid Trump will make America Great Again, so they launched this witch Hunt to try to take him down.
The *reality* is that there is an ongoing attack. That several countries are trying to deal with it means you are hiding from reality.
You said there would be no difference, which was ridiculous.
Anyone not in Putin's pocket would be going like hell on wheels.
You are being too picky in your criticism and that lowers the value of your opinion.
Even Roger Stone himself admitted that he is likely the person the indictment names as a person passing information.
The indictment charges that the conspirators “received a request for stolen materials from a candidate for the U.S. Congress,” and “sent the candidate stolen documents.” The Wall Street Journal reported a year ago that “Guccifer 2.0,” one of the Russian hackers, communicated with Florida-based Republican operative Aaron Nevins. Nevins is not named in this indictment, but the revelation that a candidate also communicated with Russian hackers indicates yet another point of contact in a conspiracy that went beyond Trump’s campaign.
The most direct path to the Trump campaign indicated in this indictment runs through Roger Stone. The Republican dirty trickster officially left the Trump campaign in 2015, but remained in regular contact with Trump throughout the campaign.
Stone admittedly engaged in direct communication with one of the indicted Russian agents. The indictment cites Stone’s contact with Guccifer 2.0:
The Chinese are robbing us of billions in intellectual property and industrial secrets yearly but let's ignore them and concentrate all our angst on Putin who is doing what he's been doing for years. Makes perfect sense to some people I guess.
Picky?
Accuracy and honesty in reporting is not being picky.
Calling attention to your misrepresentation of what was reported is not being picky.
And you keep misrepresenting it.
"1 American (yet unnamed) was mentioned as passing information to the Trump campaign."
That's false.
Show me where the indictment talks about "a person passing information"
No American was mentioned as passing information (stolen by Russian operatives or otherwise) to the Trump campaign.
And nothing's been shown that Stone knew Guccifer were Russian at the time.
And ya know what? It wouldn't be a crime even if he did.
You need to avoid filling in blanks with what you want to be "facts" and now would be a good time to start.
My comment on someone passing information to the Trump administration is based on the indictment itself.
Count One of the indictment details Russian efforts to hack computers and steal email messages belonging to the DNC, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, and the campaign of Hillary Clinton. It alleges that the conspirators, using the name Guccifer 2.0, communicated with U.S. persons about the release of the stolen documents, including someone identified only as “a person who was in regular contact with senior members of the presidential campaign of Donald J. Trump.” Department of Justice policy counsels against naming uncharged individuals and entities in indictments, instead requiring them to be referred to by description only. Stone said after the indictment that he was probably the person described in the indictment, though he is not charged with a crime.
I did not misrepresent anything.
Yes you did ... repeatedly.
What was the nature of the communication to Trump's campaign?
What was the nature of the communication to Trump's campaign?
Who knows? ...
Exactly.
About who would pay for lunch!
Who knows? I was not there and Mueller has not yet stated what information was passed.
Geez, you really like to pester don't you? Instead of talking about the problems that are facing us in the U.S., you want to get on my case. Why can't we talk about why Trump should go?
Mueller hasn't stated that information from Russians was passed.
Again ... and hopefully the final time ...
Show me where the indictment talks about "a person passing information" to the Trump campaign.
No American was mentioned as passing information (stolen by Russian operatives or otherwise) to the Trump campaign.
There's your misrepresentation. Prove it's not.
No, Trump is keying on building friendships with Putin, Kim Yung-un and Erdegan, destroying friendships with our allies and neighbors and trying to hurt China with a Trade War that is likely to hurt us more.
Makes perfect sense to some people like you, I guess.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?