• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Moral question (don't click if you're squeamish)...

Should the sadistic billionaire's offer be legal?


  • Total voters
    30
I guess it depends on what behavior you consider 'drunk'.

For me, I've always differentiated between someone who was "drunk" and someone who was just "buzzed." To me, drunk is stumbling around, slurring your words, being obnoxious, perhaps throwing up (but some people don't throw up). A lot of times, they just reek of alcohol too, like they've bathed in it. Yuck! That is a HUGE turn off for me. :shrug: A couple of drinks, fine, but if you're having more than that then chances are you're getting drunk.

As you can tell, I'm not a big fan of drunk people. :lol:
 

What if the sadistic billionaire offered someone high on drugs, or a heavily addicted drug addict? What if they offered the elderly, or mentally impaired?
These people are. or are possibly, impaired and thetrefore cannot make sound decisions for the themselves. They need to be, and, generally, are, protected by law from things like this.

Otherwise? I see no moral issue. Have at it.
 
I'm curious where this ends?

Why stop at prostitution and eye-gouging?

There are countless professions that require someone of limited means to perform some inherantly risky job in exchange for money.

What about the fireman rushing into a burning building in order to save the life of a millionairess debutante?

What about the inner-city kid working his way up the the amature boxing circut toward a chance at a prize fight?

What about a guy manning a swordfishing boat on the North Atlantic?

Where do we draw the line between jobs that are potentially dangerous and should be illegal and those that are of equal or even greater danger but should be perfectly legal?

Or is there no line?

Should it be illegal to assume any degree of risk, or expose one's self to any degree of danger, in exchange for recompense?
 
If they satisfy the conditions for legal consent (are not under influence/threat, are not impaired in decision-making) then yes. And I agree that prostitution should be legal. Let me go find that poll.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…