- Joined
- Jul 21, 2005
- Messages
- 51,719
- Reaction score
- 35,498
- Location
- Washington, DC
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
If a CEO wants to have an affair, that is between him and his spouse.
So are ones sexual actions in ones private life the only thing that is "private"? Why singular on this.
What, exactly, is the difference between being offended by a political view a CEO stated on his private time in a private conversation (that becomes known) and being offended by an illicite action a CEO did in his private time in a private situation (that becomes known)?
.
CEO's are entitled to their political opinions like everyone else. But I would certainly question a CEO's judgement if those opinions were made public.
This was not something he did on the company dime. It wasn't something he did in the name of the company. It was not something directly related to his duties with the company. This was him taking a political action in his private life...and people being offended by it and demanding pressure be put on him and action be taken. His action was making a $1000 towards a group supporting Prop 8.
.
Oh bull crap, she seeks the press out for the publicity. Cry me a river when you take her serious after appearing on Saturday Night Live.
She is just cashing in on her fame.
As I stated, his judgement should be called into question. He had to know if that got out it would be problematic. Some things are better off unsaid.
That kind of thing is often a 'victim' trying to take back some control....to use humor in that case. To show you can laugh at yourself.
Look at the people the press tries to humiliate or that the media makes fun of...Christie and his weight, Hillary on SNL, Sarah Palin on SNL, etc.
Afternoon Mason. She had an unpaid summer White House internship in the office of White House Chief of Staff Leon Panetta. It is said she got the job through family connections. She started that internship when she moved to DC in 1995. That same year she received a paid position in the White House Office of Legislative Affairs. It is said the White House staff had her transferred to the Pentagon when they noticed how much time she and Clinton were spending together.
Meanwhile, Hillary continues to blame and trash Monica, other women, the media, Republicans, etc. etc. etc. for all that and has yet to criticize or accuse Bill of any wrong doing of his own volition. And Monica, understandably, highly resents the characterization that she 'serviced Bill' when in her mind it was a completely consensual relationship and she was being 'serviced' as much as he was.
Then similarly, it should've been reasonable for people to have called Clinton's judgement into question. He had to know if it got out that he was cheating on his wife, in the oval office, with a subordinate that it would be problematic. Politics play a large part in the job of a CEO, it definitely does with a President..
Fair enough.
Nah. Everyone is fair game. One could claim the media making fun of Obama is racist just the same.
I hope she makes a fortune off of it.
Consensual 'sex acts' in the Oval Office with the President of the United States when you are a 22 year old intern?
Riiiight...I am sure she felt 100% certain she could say 'no' with zero negative ramifications...NOT.
Do you care why the story came out in the first place? Do you care that the President (the same guy it turns out that was accused of raping a campaign staff worker and groping a White House employee on the day of her husbands funeral) actually committed perjury while on trial for yet another act of sexual misconduct...one in which he ultimately pled no contest to having a state trooper escort a campaign staff worker to his room to discuss the next days strategy and instead, she walked in on him with his sweatpants around his ankles flogging the donkey, then stood up and exposed himself to her and asked her to 'kiss it'?
The whole ordeal was about so much more than a consensual act. And you may have noted...Monica actually takes RESPONSIBILITY for her role and choice in the relationship. Not Bill. Not Hillary.
You are a crack up. Its going to be ****ing hilarious watching you and others digging the Hillary Clinton "War on Women" meme during the 2016 campaign.
Her history suggests that she was a willing participant, as do her own words.
I could care less if she begged him on her knees to let her blow him...the guy is a loser for doing it and a coward for trying to cover it up to the pathetic extent that he did.
I'm not a big Hillary fan but she is a woman and any married woman deserves to be pissed at the 'other woman' if that other woman KNOWS she's messing with a married man. I realize Monica probably was overwhelmed by his power and influence and made an immature mistake but I still believe it's wrong...and she knew it...to get involved with a married man.
So I totally get a woman calling out someone cheating with her husband. I actually would have respected her more...and any of these other political wives in the same position...if she had been more honest about it instead of sucking it up and 'standing by her man.'
(by no means am I excusing Bill at all, just not addressing him here).
Some studies suggest that 70% of men and over 50% of women have cheated on their spouse. Seems like he's in pretty good company.
I'm willing to bet many of his opponents were cheating as well.
Remember this guy?
I care that he took advantage of a 22 year old intern in the Oval Office to do it.
Dude, she's 66. Even now she doesn't look quite so rotund as the hungry hungry hippo Lewinsky. I look at Miss Gravitation, and I half expect that at any minute, she'll wade out among some reeds or start grazing.Let's agree that Monica was no victim here. Do you believe Hillary was a victim? Seems to me the Clintons and those promoting Hillary for numerous "jobs" have classed here as the loyal wife, willing to forgive her man to save her marriage and family. Considering that Hillary has hung onto Billy Boy's coat tails for decades as a means to her political ambitions/ends, I'd consider her a conniving bitch who milks it for all she can. As for Monica being a little "porker" - have you had a look at Hillary? Perhaps Billy Boy isn't turned off by a little meat on the bones, so to speak.
As is evidenced by her own admission and her history, the affair was consensual.
Kindred spirits, one shouldn't wonder.If you look at the women he is accused of raping, sexual assaulting, sexual harassing, having affairs with (and yes...even the one he 'married') Bill has a thing for women with low self esteem. Wonder why that is...
Her history suggests that she was a willing participant, as do her own words.
Not really relevant (and yes...I think you will vote for her). The relevant fact is that every time the subject of Monica Lewinsky comes up, people ignore all of the relevant facts that led to the revelation of the affair. They pretend the impeachment of Clinton was about consensual sexual relations. They ignore the instances of rape, sexual assault, and sexual harassment that preceded the perjury charges. Your comments were typical. Nope...dont care about all that other stuff.You do realize I can't stand Hillary? Or do you assume because I am a lefty I'll blindly follow her?
So you keep saying.
If you think that a 22 year old intern realizing that the POTUS wants her to give him sexual favours in secret in the Oval Office is a 100% consensual-zero pressure situation...then I feel sorry for you.
We are done on this for now...I am not wasting any more time on you over this.
Good day.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?