• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Molotov-Ribbentrop: why is Moscow trying to justify Nazi pact?

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
112,035
Reaction score
102,207
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Molotov-Ribbentrop: why is Moscow trying to justify Nazi pact?

Exhibition about Soviet-Nazi treaty, signed on 23 August 1939, seeks to turn spotlight on west’s behavior in 1930's.

3948.jpg

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov speaks at the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact exhibition opening in Moscow.

8/23/19
Eighty years after the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany signed a non-aggression treaty dividing Europe into spheres of influence, Russia has put the original Molotov-Ribbentrop pact and its secret protocol on public display. Alongside the pact at the exhibition at Russia’s State Archives in Moscow are documents spanning from the 1938 Munich agreement and occupation of Czechoslovakia until the outbreak of war, which organisers say confirm Soviet fears that the west sought to redirect German aggression toward Moscow. The message to Europe is clear: everyone was at it. Russia’s foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, who spoke at the exhibition’s opening this week, made that point explicitly: “Under these circumstances, the Soviet Union was forced on its own to ensure its national security and signed a non-aggression pact with Germany,” he said. The Soviet Union long denied that the secret protocol to the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact – which was signed on 23 August 1939 – ever existed, only acknowledging and denouncing it in 1989 under Mikhail Gorbachev. “[Vladimir] Putin is saying that annexation of the Baltic states, aggression on Poland, aggression on Romania, on Finland, all of this was not a big deal, a natural part of history, and that is a problem,” said Sławomir Dębski, a Polish political scientist and the director of Polish Institute of International Affairs. “We should ask ourselves why we commemorate all these historical events. Not because these politicians are historians. We do it to send a message to our contemporary society about what is right, and what is wrong.”

Besides Munich, Putin has also cited Poland’s annexation of Czechoslovakian territory in 1938 as evidence that it was not just Moscow making agreements with Adolf Hitler. Dębski argued that Polish elites had since condemned the annexations, pointing to 2009 remarks by the former president Lech Kaczyński to world leaders, including Putin, where he called the Polish annexation “a sin”. “We should ask ourselves why Russia does not condemn the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, and what kind of message Russia trying to send,” Dębski said. The governments of Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Romania have released a statement saying the pact “doomed half of Europe to decades of misery”. The re-evaluation of the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact began as early as 2005, when Putin compared it to the Munich agreement and accused the Baltic states of attacking Russia “to cover the shame of collaborationism”. By 2007, as Russia clashed with Estonia over a bronze statue to a second world war soldier, Russian historians were increasingly publishing books and essays defending the pact as expedient. But praise for the treaty really escalated after Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014, when Moscow compared far-right support for Ukraine’s revolution to Nazi-era collaboration. The following year, Vladimir Medinsky, the country’s culture minister, called the treaty “a great achievement of Soviet diplomacy”. What’s happening in the last few years is certainly a kind of backslide, clearly in connection with politics.

The Putin regime is currently also rehabilitating Joseph Stalin.

Related: Hidden history: The Nazi-Soviet pact which Russia now tries to deny
 
I find this cynical and mildly alarming, but not surprising.

Putin has been building a cult of personality around himself for over twenty years.

And it does not take much to revive the memory of Stalin.

In Russia, Stalin never lost his glow. To Russians, Stalin was the man who led Russia out of the misery of the Revolution, won the Great Patriotic War, and made Russia strong against the west.

I remember seeing Stalin’s grave piled high with flower and war decorations, as a visitor in the 1970’s. They weren’t put there by the Brezhnev government. They were put there by thousands of ordinary WWII veterans who stood in line for hours for the privilege of seeing Lenin’s tomb and the various hero’s of the Soviet Union and the revolution who are buried behind the tomb. Only Yuri Gagarin and Zhukov even came close to the adoration that was heaped on Stalin’s grave.

The revival of Stalin points to the Russophile parochialism that has always been core to the Putin persona. He has always made it clear with gestures and actions that his goal is to re establish the Soviet sphere of influence.

I have been warning for two years now that Putin will invade Ukraine.

He has been setting the stage since 2012. First, he invaded Crimea, timing it for the close of the Olympics, when the west was off guard, and Russians at home were giddy with nationalistic pride.

In 2016, his government actively participated in the election of a weak, unstable and unsuitable (and compromised) candidate to the Presidency of their largest international rival. That man clearly believes that the Russians helped put him there,as he and his allies have worked hard to make sure the door remains open to do it again.

This built on the success of Russian cyber psyops efforts in Hungary, Italy, and with Brexit. They played a role on pushing right wing fascist candidates in Germany, France, Italy, and Poland. In many ways, the political dialogue of Uber nationalism that the Russians help promote echo the 1930’s.

They have seen the weakness, chaos and division that their man has sowed.

And now that the G-7 meeting has dissolved into little more than a photo op, they see that their goal of dividing the western alliance is suceeding.

There is a high probability that the American public may turn out the weak and divisive leader they so foolishly chose.

It would be very much in Putin’s interest to strike before that happens.
 
Last edited:
Molotov-Ribbentrop: why is Moscow trying to justify Nazi pact?

Exhibition about Soviet-Nazi treaty, signed on 23 August 1939, seeks to turn spotlight on west’s behavior in 1930's.

3948.jpg

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov speaks at the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact exhibition opening in Moscow.



The Putin regime is currently also rehabilitating Joseph Stalin.

Related: Hidden history: The Nazi-Soviet pact which Russia now tries to deny

Let us leave aside for the moment the fact that Josef Stalin was a mendacious, sadistic, paranoid mass-murderer. A few major geopolitical factors should not be forgotten as to why the Soviet Union wanted the non-aggression pact with Nazi Germany:

1. Germany had beaten the Russian Empire in World War I. Stalin most certainly wanted to delay what he saw as an inevitable confrontation back at least a few years to build up the Soviet Union's military power.
2. Josef Stalin was fearful of an anti-Communist Pact among the continental powers which might include Germany. Essentially, what scared him most was a united front against the Soviet Union.
3. The other Western powers, most especially Great Britain, were extremely reticent to join an alliance with the Soviet Union (for very good reason), so if Germany attacked the Soviet Union, there would be no ally to aid them.
4. Josef Stalin, along with most of his retinue, believed that if there were to be another European War among the continental powers, they thought that it would be much like World War I: another massive attritional bloodletting which would drag out for a long time with little progress on any side. This would help spur these countries to a socialist world revolution, with the Soviet Union as the primary beneficiary.
5. The trade opportunities were obvious: Germany technology and finished products (such as machine tools) for Soviet raw materials.

A bit more insight is described by Prof. Stephen Kotkin:

 
Last edited:
I remember seeing Stalin’s grave piled high with flower and war decorations, as a visitor in the 1970’s.


CczqOf2W8AER9aj.jpg


Russians line up to lay red flowers on Stalin's grave in Moscow on 18 December 2018.
 
Molotov-Ribbentrop: why is Moscow trying to justify Nazi pact?

Exhibition about Soviet-Nazi treaty, signed on 23 August 1939, seeks to turn spotlight on west’s behavior in 1930's.

3948.jpg

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov speaks at the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact exhibition opening in Moscow.



The Putin regime is currently also rehabilitating Joseph Stalin.

Related: Hidden history: The Nazi-Soviet pact which Russia now tries to deny

98% of Muscovites truly believe that ww2 started in 1941 , and this is a huge , huge problem

meanwhile in 1939...
220px-Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-121-0011-20%2C_Polen%2C_deutsch-sowjetische_Siegesparade.jpg


36115519474_4f096a4865_c.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom