Molly Ivins Dies of Cancer at 62
Jan 31 7:10 PM US/Eastern
By KELLEY SHANNON
Associated Press Writer
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) -- Best-selling author and columnist Molly Ivins, the sharp-witted liberal who skewered the political establishment and referred to President Bush as "Shrub," died Wednesday after a long battle with breast cancer. She was 62.
David Pasztor, managing editor of the Texas Observer, confirmed her death.
The writer, who made a living poking fun at Texas politicians, whether they were in her home base of Austin or the White House, revealed in early 2006 that she was being treated for breast cancer for the third time.
More than 400 newspapers subscribed to her nationally syndicated column, which combined strong liberal views and populist-toned humor. Ivins' illness did not seem to hurt her ability to deliver biting one- liners.
"I'm sorry to say (cancer) can kill you but it doesn't make you a better person," she said in an interview with the San Antonio Express- News in September, the same month cancer claimed her friend former Gov. Ann Richards.
To Ivins, "liberal" wasn't an insult term. "Even I felt sorry for Richard Nixon when he left; there's nothing you can do about being born liberal _ fish gotta swim and hearts gotta bleed," she wrote in a column included in her 1998 collection, "You Got to Dance With Them What Brung You."
In a column in mid-January, Ivins urged readers to stand up against Bush's plan to send more troops to Iraq.
"We are the people who run this country. We are the deciders. And every single day, every single one of us needs to step outside and take some action to help stop this war," Ivins wrote in the Jan. 11 column. "We need people in the streets, banging pots and pans and demanding, 'Stop it, now!'"
Ivins' best-selling books included those she co-authored with Lou Dubose about Bush. One was titled "Shrub: The Short but Happy Political Life of George W. Bush" and another was "BUSHWHACKED: Life in George W. Bush's America."
Whether you agreed with her viewpoints is irrelevant. That's a bit harsh don't you think?
nope, I hated the bitch....while in Iraq I read a piece of her article where she called us troops murderers and torturers.....to bad it wasn't as painful as the pain she caused our fallen brothers and sisters parents that read her hateful attacks against their fallen loved ones......
Oh, what article was that? It doesn't sound like her at all.
Again, it's too bad that she has died from a horrible disease. But you are correct that she could write some very sickening things about the people she chose to hate - the troops included.Cannot remember....see I was in Iraq where American newspapers arent in great supply..........I got it from another soldier that got it sent to him from home.........so the exact date isnt as important as what she said.......but to the likes of you and other liberals......her calling us names doesnt really mean a hill of beans to you or your type.....then you will defend her right to do so after proven that indeed she did print lies about the troops.......so why does it matter.......
Cannot remember....see I was in Iraq where American newspapers arent in great supply..........I got it from another soldier that got it sent to him from home.........so the exact date isnt as important as what she said.......but to the likes of you and other liberals......her calling us names doesnt really mean a hill of beans to you or your type.....then you will defend her right to do so after proven that indeed she did print lies about the troops.......so why does it matter.......
she could write some very sickening things about the people she chose to hate - the troops included.
Again, it's too bad that she has died from a horrible disease. But you are correct that she could write some very sickening things about the people she chose to hate - the troops included.
Can you prove she "hated the troops"? Can you prove she wrote "sickening things...about...the troops"? I'll be waiting.
You don't remember. The date doesn't matter. It doesn't matter that you can't prove it. So you exaggerate in order to make a phony point about someone whom you merely disagree with.Cold Di said:Cannot remember....see I was in Iraq where American newspapers arent in great supply..........I got it from another soldier that got it sent to him from home.........so the exact date isnt as important as what she said.......but to the likes of you and other liberals......her calling us names doesnt really mean a hill of beans to you or your type.....then you will defend her right to do so after proven that indeed she did print lies about the troops.......so why does it matter.......
"This is America? While White House lawyers were arguing about what separates torture from legitimate 'coercive interrogation techniques,' the following was taking place: Prisoners were hanged for hours or days from bars or doors in semi-crucifixions; they were repeatedly beaten unconscious, woken and then beaten again for days on end; they were sodomized; they were urinated on, kicked in the head, had their ribs broken, and were subjected to electric shocks.
The reports kept coming: Dec. 30, 2004, "Released Moroccan Guantanamo Detainee Tells Islamist Paper of His Ordeal," reported the Financial Times. "They watched you each time you went to the toilet; the American soldiers used to tear up copies of Koran and throw them in the toilet. ... " said the released prisoner.
"Some Muslims had pork or alcohol forced down their throats; they had tape placed over their mouths for reciting the Koran; many Muslims were forced to be naked in front of each other, members of the opposite sex and sometimes their own families. It was routine for the abuses to be photographed in order to threaten the showing of the humiliating footage to family members."
Now who would have done this? Is Bush watching over these prisoners? No the US Marines and US Army are......which are the "troops"....btw, most of this crap are lies to begin with......
Get your minds around it. Our country is guilty of torture. To quote myself once more: "What are you going to do about this? It's your country, your money, your government. You own this country, you run it, you are the board of directors. They are doing this in your name. The people we elected to public office do what you want them to. Perhaps you should get in touch with them."
-= NONE SO BLIND =-
here the bitch call those who torure "without saying the troops" Nazis......
I hope this bitch had a long painful death
Cold Di said:here the bitch call those who torure "without saying the troops" Nazis......
Molly Ivins said:And do not pretend to be shocked when the world seriously begins comparing us to the Nazis.
Cannot remember....see I was in Iraq where American newspapers arent in great supply..........I got it from another soldier that got it sent to him from home.........so the exact date isnt as important as what she said.......but to the likes of you and other liberals......her calling us names doesnt really mean a hill of beans to you or your type.....then you will defend her right to do so after proven that indeed she did print lies about the troops.......so why does it matter.......
She was a partisan bitch.......
Molly Ivins was a political humorist, who made fun of Texas politicians. Whether it was GW Bush or Ann Richards, Ivins had the ability to make people laugh at them. Liberal? Conservative? She was pretty even handed, and made fun of them all. She is noted for giving Bush the name "Shrub", which has stuck ever since.
During the 2004 Democratic primary, she was asked who would win. She replied that Bush was beatable, but that Bush might win anyways, due to Kerry. She said that Kerry was an intelligent boring stiff, a boring stiff who knew the issues, but still a boring stiff. The way she said it was hilarious.
Ivins did criticize the Iraq war, but I never saw an article from her that called the troops murderers and baby killers, as you claim. She did call out specific troops for Abu Ghraib, and other atrocities, but guess what? So did the military, who charged them. You going to call the military troop haters too?
All in all, your response is just another in the many flamefests we have come to know you for.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?