- Joined
- Feb 26, 2012
- Messages
- 56,981
- Reaction score
- 27,029
- Location
- Chicago Illinois
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Private
I thought it was MI6? What's this MI5 crazy talk?
England's Top Man at MI5 is putting out this warning. Do you think the rest of the West will ignore what the Brits are saying? Do you think BO and his Team were given one of the First calls? What say ye?
The head of Britain's domestic spy agency MI5 warned on Thursday that militant Islamists in Syria were planning "mass casualty attacks" in the West and that intelligence services may be powerless to stop them.
"We know... that a group of core al-Qaeda terrorists in Syria is planning mass casualty attacks against the West," Andrew Parker told journalists in London a day after an Islamist attack in Paris claimed 12 lives.....snip~
Militants planning mass casualty attacks against West
I think there's a whole bunch of loyal Americans saying, "What's taking them so long??" I always go back to what an acquaintance told me, probably 11-12 years ago. He's a very interesting man. A "code savant" -- completely socially inept -- genius IQ. Visiting with him is like having Google live by your side. He said that the west has made it very clear to radical Muslim leadership that if they 'go too far,' Mecca will be destroyed. *shrug*
England's Top Man at MI5 is putting out this warning. Do you think the rest of the West will ignore what the Brits are saying? Do you think BO and his Team were given one of the First calls? What say ye?
The head of Britain's domestic spy agency MI5 warned on Thursday that militant Islamists in Syria were planning "mass casualty attacks" in the West and that intelligence services may be powerless to stop them.
"We know... that a group of core al-Qaeda terrorists in Syria is planning mass casualty attacks against the West," Andrew Parker told journalists in London a day after an Islamist attack in Paris claimed 12 lives.....snip~
Militants planning mass casualty attacks against West
I thought it was MI6? What's this MI5 crazy talk?
Hot dam, but ain't these the same "moderate rebels," fighting Bashar Assad in Syria, that we
have been funding and arming. Now Bashar Assad seems to be the only one who has any
success in fighting these rebels and we are arming and funding the rebels. They's a little
something wrong with the picture here, methinks. Like 16 Saudi Nationals doing 9/11. So
we help the Saudis fly out of the Country. I don't guess that, as long as we are funding and
arming these rebels that they would bite the hand that feeds them, unless "the hand" was
not trustworthy and developed "frenemies" as standard operating procedure, eh? I'm
being facetiou here, don't ya' know, using the truth.
"Never happen". Heard that a million times. But if it does, it wont be terror and it wont be "real muslims".
Yea. Just who will destroy Mecca? It wont be us. Maybe Israel. But not us.
Heya DF :2wave: Some.....the major concern are all the Pakistani AQ and ISIS sympathizers showing up there.
I think there's a whole bunch of loyal Americans saying, "What's taking them so long??" I always go back to what an acquaintance told me, probably 11-12 years ago. He's a very interesting man. A "code savant" -- completely socially inept -- genius IQ. Visiting with him is like having Google live by your side. He said that the west has made it very clear to radical Muslim leadership that if they 'go too far,' Mecca will be destroyed. *shrug*
As to the OP...honestly, I think militants have never STOPPED planning attacks against the west. Their religion compels them to do so.
I think the only thing that has changed, is that some people are just now beginning to realize just how vulnerable we are...we've had such narrow thinking in terms of the forms terrorism can take...and the french shooting has likely trashed some of those securities.
Once again, I am sympathetic to your refrain, however AQ is the group that came from Wahhabis in Saudi Arabia and we armed and funded them in Afghanistan and ISIS is allied with these alleged "moderate rebels" we arm and fund to fight Bashar Assad so we can get OIL, Gas, and Pipeline R.O.W.s to the Mediterranean. I mean to say , with clarity, that we are not fighting for some mythic holy grail in Syria, but for CORPORATE hegemony. I wouldn't be surprised if many Muslims in the MidEast noticed what are motives really are. The MIC needs the Terror War, the Drug War, the Police War, and especially the Fear War. We are the victims, my friend. I gotta go shovel some snow. See ya later.
Nah. AQ is on the run and Bin Laden is dead.
Heya HB. :2wave: It looks like, since the Brits are saying something now. It still don't mean much to the rest out there.
As to the OP...honestly, I think militants have never STOPPED planning attacks against the west. Their religion compels them to do so.
I think the only thing that has changed, is that some people are just now beginning to realize just how vulnerable we are...we've had such narrow thinking in terms of the forms terrorism can take...and the french shooting has likely trashed some of those securities.
So you think they will reopen the Tap line? For what.....Iran was looking to do that with Syria. Its not that much Oil.....in the grand scheme of things.
Right now.....whatever was in the Past. Is not what we are dealing with. Either way.....this has to be put down!
Nah. AQ is on the run and Bin Laden is dead.
We'll ignore it as best we can until it becomes a major event here. Then there'll be no turning back.
You said it is a religious problem and ergo it is the Pope's problem, or some Pope's, or the Dalai Lama, or the Rev. Al Sharpton or Rev. Jackson, eh?
Well.....that's why our media treats it as a spectator sport. Until that moment comes. Then the cries of horror.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?