• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Michigan Gov. Snyderapproval rating deflates

haymarket

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 3, 2010
Messages
120,954
Reaction score
28,531
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder's approval rating deflates | Detroit Free Press | freep.com

Farther than Walker.
Faster than Walker.

The guy he beat by almost 20 points just five months ago would beat him today.


And all because he is picking on union rights in Michigan and attemptingto shift $1.7 billion in taxes from his pals in the corporate business world to seniors and lower wage workers. Right now, there are over 35 different bills before the Legislature which traget various union rights in addition to taxing seniors and cutting the earned income tax credit program. A sleeping giant has awakened. Recalls are next.
 
Last edited:

Perhaps.

I will never again pay any attention at all to an announced poll when I don't know exactly how the poll's questions were worded. Neither should anyone else.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps.

I will never again pay any attention at all to an announced poll when I don't know exactly how the poll's questions were worded. Neither should anyone else.

but Maggie .... you just did.
 

(I'm likin' you a lot today.) Thank you for posting the link.

Okay, here's what I think.

Since only 11.5 % of people in the United States belong to unions (public/private both), the poll is skewed. 36% of those polled belonged to unions. Next, when asked who they'd vote for today, there's only a difference of 2%. In other words, 47% would vote for the opponent; 45% would vote for the sitting governor. (8% not sure) This is hardly political dynamite.

Edit re Post #4: Brat!
 
Last edited:

Go back and reread it Maggie. First of all, Michigan has a higher percentage of union members than the USA does so you cannot use that 12% number. Actually here its over 18% of workers which is a full 50% higher than it is for the nation. That is significant.


http://www.bls.gov/ro5/unionmi.htm


Second, they did not ask if the respondent was a union member but if there was a family member who was. The result was 36% yes and 64% no.
 
Last edited:

Excellent point. It's actually 16.5% from your link (18% was 2009). I'm such a purist. You've shown me that there's more to the story that first meets the eye. I like that. I really don't know how one would take a perfect poll. Probably not possible.
 

This same group did a presidential poll of Charlie Sheen vs. Sarah Palin.

Sheen won.

And before anyone goes RARR LIBRULS HATE PALIN, I'll point out that Obama lost to Sheen as well. When you put a ridiculous option on a poll, people are going to pick it. Donald Duck would beat Palin and Obama in a poll because when you add a stupid option to polls you end up with a stupid poll.

So yeah. PPP is not what I'd consider a fantastic polling outfit.
 
I could get a poll to tell you that water is actually dry.

Pay no attention. These are skewed all the time to provide the hypothesis the writer is seeking. Real jounalism is long gone.
 
Say what you will but this is getting TONS of attention here in Michigan. And it swept through the Capitol Building like a tornado this afternoon.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…