Michelle Obama is a Birther.

[BmanMcfly]

and do you honestly think that the cia, or fbi or who ever don't take a look at presidential candidates, just to make sure that they are eligible?

Yes... look at Ron Paul, whatever you think of his politics, people with STRONG connections made certain that Paul would not get a fair voice during the campaign and so he was made certain to lose.

Obama on the other hand, he had close to a million dollars in 'donations' from the big 6 banks (the ones that profited from the "bailouts"). About 4 times the level of funding that McCain received.

Obama was GROOMED to become president... If nothing else, assuming he is not a natural born american citizen, that fact is just more like a piece of insurance to make sure he plays ball. If he decided to actually start working for the best interest of the people of this country, there wouldn't be a NEED to pull a JFK on him, they'd just have it come out that he was in fact not a citizen and throw him in jail.

Plain and simple, it's a rigged game.

 

[BmanMcfly]

It's what the Conspiracy Theory Forum is all about. In fact, the fact that he posted it here should be evidence that he was aware that this is nothing but bunk.

You know what... I'm calling bunk on this analysis... I've had MSM headline news get tossed in the 'conspiracy section' at the cost of a warning point SPECIFICALLY because of the topic.

Another time I had a series of 10 MSM news reports all confirming something that's typically in 'conspiracy section'... I was given a warning and the topic thrown into the conspiracy section, because 1 (ONE) of the MSM articles was more then 48 hours old.

So, while I understand having the 'conspiracy theories section'... this is an absolute piece of horse _____ to call everything bunk because of where it's located.

Nothing more then a tame version of censorship over certain topics.

(BTW, CC you were not personally involved in either of those occurances, so don't feel overly targeted)

 

[Renae]

You know what... I'm calling bunk on this analysis... I've had MSM headline news get tossed in the 'conspiracy section' at the cost of a warning point SPECIFICALLY because of the topic.

Another time I had a series of 10 MSM news reports all confirming something that's typically in 'conspiracy section'... I was given a warning and the topic thrown into the conspiracy section, because 1 (ONE) of the MSM articles was more then 48 hours old.

So, while I understand having the 'conspiracy theories section'... this is an absolute piece of horse _____ to call everything bunk because of where it's located.

Nothing more then a tame version of censorship over certain topics.

(BTW, CC you were not personally involved in either of those occurances, so don't feel overly targeted)

I put it here, for the reasons CC stated. If there was something legit, I'd post it elsewhere.

 

[BmanMcfly]

I put it here, for the reasons CC stated. If there was something legit, I'd post it elsewhere.

No, I can understand this specific topic being in conspiracy theory, even though the topic of Obama's birth certificate is such a retarded issue to NEED to debate, when simply showing the PROPER documents in the beginning would have prevented this situation in the first place.

I was talking about labelling the whole 'conspiracy theories' section 'bunk' as a sweeping generalization. Yes... there IS bunk information. I'm not talking about that though. I'm talking about the legitimate information that is in MSM news stories, one of them even front page news, getting tossed into the 'bunk' section for the simple matter that the TOPIC was deemed 'conspiracy theory'.

At a certain point it's like seeing your neighbours house on fire and they are sitting watching tv, so you knock down the door to try and pull them out screaming that the house is on fire and they have to get out... only for the homeowner to look at you saying 'that's just a conspiracy theory' and continuing to gulp down another handful of popcorn.

Also, (no mod targeted in specific) mods are supposed to be moderating the forums, not acting as the judge of reality... deciding which topics are 'real' and which ones are 'bunk'... even when they are both articles coming from the same newspaper.