- Joined
- Nov 11, 2011
- Messages
- 12,895
- Reaction score
- 2,909
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
So you support rape racks for dogs?
No, I just don't care because we are talking about something that is content eating it's own ****
Ever seen 2 girls, 1 cup?
Slaughtered animals for consumption are supposed to be killed in a humane manner.The pig which provides the bacon people don't really need also could not give it's consent, nor did the chicken whose eggs were stolen to round out breakfast. The dogs were bred for fighting, like the chicken and pig were bred for eating.
The humans on the gridiron may be giving their consent, but watching them crippling each other is no less animalistic than what Vick did.
you're trying to draw a comparison between an extreme outlier and a general state. Not to mention overlooking the psychological and free will aspects of rape that don't simply exist with animals.
you do understand humans are capable of higher thought and free will?
Slaughtered animals for consumption are supposed to be killed in a humane manner.
People who fight dogs, and I know plenty, are worthless scum.
THEY cant fight, yet they are all about having their dogs do it for them.
You really need to come on down and see what happens at a dog fight before you make comparisons between cows and dogs.
Dog fighting and football share more in common than you are comfortable admitting. I understand that. Both are tests of strength and toughness with ugly outcomes.I don't watch football for the injuries and blood. It's a byproduct of the sport.
Uh, female dogs are always bred against their will. They go in heat and they are bred whether they want to be or not. If they are not in heat, no point in breeding them.What do you call being bred against their will?
Maybe you have never seen one.
Stallworths plea deal was also to provide resitution to his victims family.I don't have a problem with Vick being charged and imprisoned for his crimes. I don't have a problem with people being outraged by dog fighting. I do have a problem with th efact that our society appears to be more outraged, and creates harsher punishments, for someone like Vick for his crimes than they do for someone like Donte Stallworth and his crimes.
Donte Stallworth killed a human being through an act of pure negligence and he only served 24 days in jail for it. Vick served 548 days for killing dogs. There's something inherently wrong with a society where that particular discrepancy can exist. There's something inherently wrong with a society that is more outraged by Vick's crime than Stallworth's.
you do understand humans are capable of higher thought and free will?
Dogs don't normally eat their own poo.
You don't think that animals choose their mates?
Well...think of the dogs being thrown into a pit and/or slammed against a wall as "God's Will".
I don't have a problem with Vick being charged and imprisoned for his crimes. I don't have a problem with people being outraged by dog fighting. I do have a problem with th efact that our society appears to be more outraged, and creates harsher punishments, for someone like Vick for his crimes than they do for someone like Donte Stallworth and his crimes.
Donte Stallworth killed a human being through an act of pure negligence and he only served 24 days in jail for it. Vick served 548 days for killing dogs. There's something inherently wrong with a society where that particular discrepancy can exist. There's something inherently wrong with a society that is more outraged by Vick's crime than Stallworth's.
Yeah, this is basically an argument between two extremes who lack any ability to take their views in context or logically critique them. You two have fun
Stallworths plea deal was also to provide resitution to his victims family.
They are not going to get a penny if he sits in jail.
Also, yes he as negligent. But so was his victim. Read the whole story.
Driving while intoxicated is not mitigated by what the victim does. He should have been forced to give restitution AND served more time in jail.
24 days is a crime. There are lots of inequities in our justice system.
His "victim" was a drunk jay walker.24 days is a crime. There are lots of inequities in our justice system.
How was he going to do that?
And yes it is a mitigating circumstance. Just ask Billy Lane.
His "victim" was a drunk jay walker.
A female can fight off a dog she doesn't want to mate with.
rof Drunk jaywalking < drunk driving.
You're responding to a post highlighting the fact that both extremes here seem to lack all ability to differentiate an animal from a human by stil;l ignoring the differences between an animal and human
Basically: Derp
Not how things work and you know it.rof Drunk jaywalking < drunk driving.
is "drunk jaywalking" even an additional charge above jaywalking?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?