Wow. Someone does think that.
Too bad there is no rule that says such.
Wow. Someone actually believes a rule exist that does not exist.
Simply wow.
I have already stated my position on this subject.
Did you fail to read it?
:doh"translation" your scared to vote
lets us know when you are ready
:doh
iLOL
Translation.
You have no idea if I voted or not.
And I am not going to give you the satisfaction of knowing either way.
:lamo
:doh
You no nothing.
:lamo
yes anonymous votes do not count because of spamming.
and yes that is the rule this is why any good poll is public because MODS have had to tell us what the REAL votes are for polls when they get spammed.
For example, what often happens is we cant see the votes but when the mods look, 5 members actually voted for item A, but then magically there 40 anonymous votes making the vote 45
and then theres 40 member votes for item B and 2 anonymous votes making the total 42
that poll was spammed
BUT by all means if you would like to include the spammed votes im more then fine with 64 yes (92.75%) and 3 no (4.35%) and 2 others LMAO
and ill gladly make a new statement that nobody was silly enough to publicly vote no
lets us know when you are ready to vote
1.)The mods are conveying some secret info to you?
2.)What would a spammer be in this situation?
3.)Besides, YOU are who decided to make it anonymous.
4.) Why did you do that if you don't like it?
5.)BTW - are they going for Murder 1 or Murder 2? I would think Murder 1 would be a stretch - and done only to allow the jury to compromise downward. Sounds like M2. Maybe even Manslaughter, but not M1.
Poll numbers corrected.(for actual members)
:doh
iLOL
Translation.
You have no idea if I voted or not.
And I am not going to give you the satisfaction of knowing either way.
:lamo
And a 90 year old considers their 60 year old offspring their child. :doh
let us know when you are ready to vote, we'll be here waiting
And a more accurately and neutral description is young adults, as they were. Not kids, or children.In my view, and I agree its just my view, its not a question of whether of not the rules of semantics say a 90 year old refers to a 60 year old as his "child" but rather does society and a persons' parents consider him to be a minor. An 11th grader s considered a minor except in places where human rights groups condemns them for not doing so. A 60 year old is not considered a minor, even by his parents.
You are not making any sense in reply to what you have been told.
You have no idea if I voted or not. - Do you not understand that?
And I am not going to give you the satisfaction of knowing either way. - What is it about this that you do not understand?
It is like you do not know how to take no for an answer.
Still not making any sense to what you have been told.like i said we are her when you are ready to vote
Still not making any sense to what you have been told.
Wow. You really don't understand what you have been told.we are waiting
So will I. BFD?we'll be here
So will I. BFD?
You should really stop making idiotic assertion about others.yep to scared
You should really stop making idiotic assertion about others.
I have already stated my position on this case.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?