• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Meet Ardi, your distant ancestor

Dittohead not!

master political analyst
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 3, 2009
Messages
52,009
Reaction score
33,944
Location
The Golden State
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Meet Ardi, Your First Human Ancestor


The current thinking is that bipedalism evolved first, then human intelligence. I've also read that it is easier for the large brain associated with modern humans to have been supported in an upright posture. It makes sense to me.
 
I do not mean to sound like a skeptic but how do they get a complete skeletal structure from something as totally incomplete as this
 

Attachments

  • Ardipithecus-ramidus-live-001.jpg
    20.7 KB · Views: 47
Last edited:

I read Arbi and thought of the restaurant chain, then became hungry.

*shakes fist angrilly at ditto for making me hungry*
 
jamesrage said:
I do not mean to sound like a skeptic but how do they get a complete skeletal structure from something as totally incomplete as this
Click to expand...

Hmm... that looks interesting. Good find. But, to be fair, the article doesn't really mention the completeness of the skeleton, it only mentioned a few of the bones (which your pic has.)
 
The_Penguin said:
Hmm... that looks interesting. Good find. But, to be fair, the article doesn't really mention the completeness of the skeleton, it only mentioned a few of the bones (which your pic has.)
Click to expand...

The article has a drawing of what they claim the creature looks like and they are claiming it is our ancestor, so obviously they did speculate what its skeletal structure looks like to make that determination. The Lucy(Australopithecus afarensis) skeleton is no better. Its seems nothing more than a bunch of speculation based on totally incomplete worn down down bone fragments that they are trying to pass off as facts.
 

Attachments

  • 220px-Lucy_blackbg.jpg
    17.6 KB · Views: 29
Lucy's pelvic area is preserved well enough to tell it walked upright. You can mirror each side to get a more complete skeleton. Artistic interpretations of prehistoric life are by necessity semi-speculative. No one is claiming that the whole reconstructed skeleton is 100% correct.
 
Yeah, even dinosaurs... I mean, they've found few if any complete skeletons.
They just have to make up some of it.
 

The issue is that Ardi is not an ape, nor is she a human, nor sometihng in between. She is a creature that walked upright, but didn't have the big brain associated with humans.


I found this interesting (from your link):

Based on Ardi’s anatomy, it appears that chimpanzees may actually have evolved more than humans — in the scientific sense of having changed more over the past 7 million years or so
Click to expand...
 
jamesrage said:
I do not mean to sound like a skeptic but how do they get a complete skeletal structure from something as totally incomplete as this
Click to expand...
You'd be amazed at what can be done with modern physical anthropology. A single bone can give you a wealth of information as the structure of terrestrial life tends to follow certain patterns; you dont have something with the head the size of a cat on the body of a mouse.

With, say, a part of the skull, you can extrapolate the size of the skull which will give you good information about the rest of the body.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…