- Joined
- Oct 26, 2016
- Messages
- 14,028
- Reaction score
- 8,657
- Location
- Tampa Bay area
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
It sounds like Matthews has a problem!The Manatee County Sheriff's Department and Eugene Matthews have feuded for decades. Not a single one of seven prior arrests have resulted in a conviction.
In short, Matthews housed a friend's dog. The friend had died the week before. The family that came to pick up the dog anticipated trouble retrieving the dog. In spite of this, they hatched a plan anyway. The plan went haywire. Mr. Matthews shot and killed his friend's wife. Now Matthews resides without bond in the county jail with his trial set for this July.
The Sheriff's Department, the local Judiciary, local State Attorney's office and local newspaper all have it out for Eugene Matthews. His future freedom rests on the quality of his representation and a jury.
How do you think this plays out?
PArrish murder suspect order held without bond in fatal shooting of best friend's wife | Bradenton Herald
It sounds like Matthews has a problem!
No matter what, it will likely cost Matthews a lot of money, even if he is not found guilty.My 2nd oldest daughter, an athletic and cute tomboy in her childhood years, turned 24 in January. When she reached her teens, she told me with utmost sincerity that she liked to fight. I paused and looked at her before responding with an answer. Then I told her "Okay, but choose a neutral spot or our turf, otherwise you put me at a prohibitive disadvantage."
In Eugene Matthews case, the State, even with an intuitively huge power advantage, has a huge obstacle to overcome. The people who went to retrieve the dog could have pursued other safer and more reasonable courses of action. They knew with certainty they endangered themselves by going onto the property.
Look like the second that he lied about themkicking in the door he pretty much guaranteed his arrest and would daresay conviction. Its hard to claim self defense when people are in their car driving away.
I guess I AM taking it for granted that she was shot in a car through windsheld based on police accounts cited. I'm sure the media is just making that up.I find it interesting that someone with Right of Center proclivity would not champion any number of Constitutional Rights and Florida's Stand Your Ground Statute as fairly clear protection and grounds for dismissal of the charges.
That you would so readily draw a conclusion that either Matthews or his girlfriend lied and not the driver of the truck that wrecked while leaving indicates you have already accepted the media version of events.
Criminals routinely haul ass from the scene of a crime. Criminals who knowingly enter a fenced, gated, private homestead clearly marked with No Trespassing and Warning Signs... and further to this, know the primary occupant of the residence has guns, really make themselves vulnerable to injury, death, and minimal protection of the Law.
Yep, saw that and put it in my post, too. That's should be easily verifiable physical evidence, forcing Mr. Mathews to prove she was an eminent danger requiring deadly force to neutralize. And that might not be so easy to do.I guess I AM taking it for granted that she was shot in a car through windsheld based on police accounts cited. I'm sure the media is just making that up.
Even in states with stand your ground laws, there are limits. Unless they drove that car into his living room, I'm guessing its pretty clear his actions were excessive.Yep, saw that and put it in my post, too. That's should be easily verifiable physical evidence, forcing Mr. Mathews to prove she was an eminent danger requiring deadly force to neutralize. And that might not be so easy to do.
Yep.Even in states with stand your ground laws, there are limits. Unless they drove that car into his living room, I'm guessing its pretty clear his actions were excessive.
Castle Doctrine can be interpreted that you can shoot anyone in your home regardless. You really never know when someone that is retreating might suddenly become a threat. However...in your yard...or in your driveway...thats a different set of rules.Yep.
'Stand your ground' does not mean 'shoot innocents' or 'shoot those retreating'.
I guess I AM taking it for granted that she was shot in a car through windsheld based on police accounts cited. I'm sure the media is just making that up.
Castle Doctrine can be interpreted that you can shoot anyone in your home regardless. You really never know when someone that is retreating might suddenly become a threat. However...in your yard...or in your driveway...thats a different set of rules.
Criminals routinely haul ass from the scene of a crime. Criminals who knowingly enter a fenced, gated, private homestead clearly marked with No Trespassing and Warning Signs... and further to this, know the primary occupant of the residence has guns, really make themselves vulnerable to injury, death, and minimal protection of the Law.
Is this some kind of justification to shoot them?
Absolutely Yes. Did you look at photos of Mr. Matthews homestead? If you choose to go out of your way to a bear's habitat, then tweak a bear's nose, expect consequences.
Right... because we are like bears.
Hopefully he is found guilty and executed for murdering a person that was of no threat.
My 2nd oldest daughter, an athletic and cute tomboy in her childhood years, turned 24 in January. When she reached her teens, she told me with utmost sincerity that she liked to fight. I paused and looked at her before responding with an answer. Then I told her "Okay, but choose a neutral spot or our turf, otherwise you put me at a prohibitive disadvantage."
In Eugene Matthews case, the State, even with an intuitively huge power advantage, has a huge obstacle to overcome. The people who went to retrieve the dog could have pursued other safer and more reasonable courses of action. They knew with certainty they endangered themselves by going onto the property.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?