• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Medicare for All a timely prescription

Razoo

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 1, 2017
Messages
24,476
Reaction score
7,808
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
By Amy Goodman & Denis Moynihan
Democracy NOW

Early voting in the 2022 midterm elections has begun in many states, and inflation, the economy and recession are top concerns for most voters, according to polls. Democratic political consultant James Carville’s 1992 presidential campaign quip, “It’s the economy, stupid,” has been getting lots of use lately.

If true, it’s odd that healthcare has hardly been raised as a campaign issue, even though it accounts for 20% of the U.S. economy.

U.S. healthcare is a complex patchwork of public and private entities and programs, resulting in the most expensive per capita healthcare in the world. Yet, the health of people in this country, on average, is worse than in other wealthy nations.

A key driver of this disparity is the hugely profitable private health insurance industry that has inserted itself between patient and doctor. This broken system consumes hundreds of billions of dollars annually and should be central in every election debate. One solution to this uniquely American problem would be adoption of single-payer healthcare, or Medicare for All, eliminating private insurers entirely.

In a 2019 academic paper entitled “It’s Still The Prices, Stupid: Why The US Spends So Much On Health Care,” Johns Hopkins Professor Gerard Anderson and colleagues explain, “US per capita health spending was $9,892 in 2016. The US spending level was 25 percent higher than that of Switzerland ($7,919)…108 percent higher than that of neighboring Canada ($4,753).”

Dr. Steffie Woolhandler is a primary care physician and co-founder of Physicians for a National Health Plan, which advocates for a U.S. single-payer system. She appeared on the Democracy Now! news hour in November, 2020, explaining,

“What we really need is to provide good insurance to everyone. We call that single payer or Medicare for All. It’s a type of system that the rest of the developed world has, like Canada, like Scotland. You enroll in insurance the day you’re born, and you keep it your entire life.

It’s not free; you pay for it through your taxes. But it’s a much more efficient system, because you don’t have all this administrative complexity and hassle that is eating up a huge share of U.S. healthcare spending, probably more than a third.

So, by simplifying healthcare, moving it away from a business to a public service, you save a lot of money.

The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed enormous gaps, flaws and inequities in our healthcare system. Widespread access to publicly-subsidized vaccines here has radically altered the course of the pandemic, but COVID-19 is still causing deaths and hospitalizations and stressing our healthcare delivery system, especially frontline healthcare workers. The CDC reports that 323 people on average are dying daily from COVID in the U.S. This mostly preventable death toll is predicted to get worse this winter as people move indoors and new Omicron variants emerge.

This week, Secretary of Health and Human Services Xavier Becerra extended the COVID-19 public health emergency for another 3 months. This provides for a significant array of taxpayer-funded support, like free COVID vaccinations and testing kits. Perhaps more importantly, the emergency declaration extends added access to Medicaid coverage and CHIP (Children’s Health Insurance Program). When the Public Health Emergency ends, HHS estimates, up to 15 million people will lose their health insurance.

Medicare for All is largely absent in media coverage. Could this be related to the media’s money stream, the constant barrage of pharmaceutical and insurance company advertisements? Nevertheless, single-payer is being championed by many progressive candidates. Rep. Cori Bush, Democratic Congressmember from Missouri’s 1st Congressional District, is running for reelection as she completes her first term. Cori Bush is the first African American woman representing Missouri in Congress. The formerly unhoused single mother is also a nurse. In her just-published memoir, “The Forerunner,” she writes,

“As someone who has been either uninsured or underinsured for most of my adult life, I know what it’s like to be burdened by thousands of dollars in medical debt and to have to seek out routine medical care in an emergency room rather than with a primary care doctor. And as a nurse, I’ve seen too many patients forgo mental health services or be forced to ration their insulin because they couldn’t afford the cost of treatment or medication.

It’s also why I fight for Medicare for All, including for easy access to comprehensive mental health services and affordable prescription drugs, because health care is a human right and must be guaranteed for everyone.”

Unmitigated greed of private health insurers and drug companies is a major driver of inequality in our society. Medicare for All is a long-overdue prescription for our ailing healthcare system.
 
"So, by simplifying healthcare, moving it away from a business to a public service, you save a lot of money."?
 
"So, by simplifying healthcare, moving it away from a business to a public service, you save a lot of money."?

As the saying goes: For every difficult questions there are a hundred easy answers, all of which are wrong. Lets remember that even for those on Medicare nearly 40% use private insurance companies for Medicare Plus. Without Medicare Plus many people would still go bankrupt with just Medicare. Not sure if we turned all health care workers would help lower costs. The fact that we have been in the system for so long has created something not sure we can work our way out of.
 
As the saying goes: For every difficult questions there are a hundred easy answers, all of which are wrong. Lets remember that even for those on Medicare nearly 40% use private insurance companies for Medicare Plus. Without Medicare Plus many people would still go bankrupt with just Medicare. Not sure if we turned all health care workers would help lower costs. The fact that we have been in the system for so long has created something not sure we can work our way out of.
Hence, my question seeking clarification.
 

Medicare for All a timely prescription​


If it's such a great idea, why haven't California and New York done it by now?
 
Hence, my question seeking clarification.

If the question is where we are due to the media income stream my answer would be slightly, a tiny portion. There are many buckets that have lobbyists fighting to keep their slice of the pie. The biggest might be lawyers who would have a bigger problem trying to sue the Federal Government.
 
If the question is where we are due to the media income stream my answer would be slightly, a tiny portion. There are many buckets that have lobbyists fighting to keep their slice of the pie. The biggest might be lawyers who would have a bigger problem trying to sue the Federal Government.
Your previous answer was better, though I don't feel it was a difficult question.
 
If it's such a great idea, why haven't California and New York done it by now?
IMO, Medicaid for all would better describe a system where only some pay the costs while all participate in the benefits of the resulting spending.
 
If it's such a great idea, why haven't California and New York done it by now?
Every state in the union must be on board to make it affordable. As it is no medical insurance is affordable which is why 50% of bankruptcies by the insured are related to health care.

The greater majority of insured consumers are under insured.

Medicare for ALL and Medicare are two different animals. Medicare for ALL is designed to be funded with our tax dollars thus no one goes without medical care. The people who tell us we cannot afford Single Payer are the medical insurance industry and their bought and paid for politicians.

These above industries fund 10 lobbyists per elected official.

It's clear why the medical insurance industry is not affordable.

The medical insurance industry and other health care corporations throw a ton of money at politicians
to keep their all of their gravy trains alive. They all lie to we the voters and citizens.
 
I want my tax dollars to pay!
= YES I want my tax dollars to pay!
= Never losing health insurance for any reason
= Bankruptcy due to health care would be history
= Health Care remains private industry
= Health Care Providers ALWAYS get paid thus keeping cost of healthcare in check

WHEREAS Universal Health Insurance would cover every person in the U.S. for all necessary medical care including:

= prescription drugs
= hospital
= surgical
= outpatient services
= primary and preventive care
= emergency services
= dental
= mental health
= home health
= physical therapy
= rehabilitation (including for substance abuse)
= vision care
= chiropractic
= long-term care.

Single Payer ends deductibles and co-payments.

Single Payer would save billions annually by eliminating high overhead and profits of the private health insurance industry and HMOs.

The transition to national health insurance would apply the savings from costly administration and profits to expanded and improved coverage for all.

Approximately 2.6 million jobs will become available through Single Payer Insurance = pays for itself.
 
Every member of the population is paying into the Single Payer cookie jar thus we all pay wayyyyy
less as a result. Of course none of us would be receiving an invoice for premiums and none of us
would ever get behind in payments.

No more obscene CEO salary packages and golden parachutes.

This will reduce the cost of government, education and eye glasses dramatically.
 
Every state in the union must be on board to make it affordable.

How do you figure? There are plenty of countries smaller than CA that seem to manage.
 
How do you figure? There are plenty of countries smaller than CA that seem to manage.
This is the USA we must remember .......... everything in the USA seems to cost more money. The more people included the less cost per person. Let's be efficient.
 
This is the USA we must remember .......... everything in the USA seems to cost more money. The more people included the less cost per person. Let's be efficient.

You think things in the USA are more expensive than in Belgium?
 
You think things in the USA are more expensive than in Belgium?
I don't live in Belgium and Medicare for Alll has nothing to do with Belgium.

This is the USA we must remember .......... everything in the USA seems to cost more money. The more people included the less cost per person. Let's be efficient.

"There are plenty of countries smaller than CA that seem to manage." Healthcare in many countries is not as expensive as the USA. Countries smaller than California = not as many people to cover.
 
Top 10 Reasons For Enacting a Single Payer Healthcare System
  • Everybody in,nobody out. ...
  • Portability. ...
  • Uniform benefits. ...
  • Prevention. ...
  • Choice of physician. ...
  • Ending insurance industry interference with care. ...
  • Reducing administrative waste. ...
  • Cost savings.
More items...

Sep 20, 2017

Top 10 Reasons For Enacting a Single Payer Healthcare ...​

 

Many in Congress invest in companies they'll affect with votes​

https://www.statnews.com › 2015/12/01 › congress-pha...

Dec 1, 2015 — In the Senate, investors favored Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, and Merck. Members of Congress owned more stock in health-related companies last ...

Over One-Third of Congressional Members Held Significant ...​

https://www.pennmedicine.org › news-releases › august

Aug 9, 2021 — Revelations that some members of Congress, including members of key health care committees, hold substantial personal investments in the ...
Missing: elected ‎| Must include: elected

Health - OpenSecrets​

https://www.opensecrets.org › industries › indus

During the 2018 election cycle, health care has been one of the top issues voters and candidates seem to care about. It's of no surprise that members of ...
 
I don't live in Belgium and Medicare for Alll has nothing to do with Belgium.

This is the USA we must remember .......... everything in the USA seems to cost more money. The more people included the less cost per person. Let's be efficient.

"There are plenty of countries smaller than CA that seem to manage." Healthcare in many countries is not as expensive as the USA. Countries smaller than California = not as many people to cover.

1667106696207.webp
 

Medicare for All a timely prescription​

And you thought the current inflation is bad. Medicare for all will DOUBLE federal spending on something that shouldn't be in federal government at all.
 

Medicare for All a timely prescription​

And you thought the current inflation is bad. Medicare for all will DOUBLE federal spending on something that shouldn't be in federal government at all.
Wrong ........... Medicare for All - means everyone will have full coverage, be healthier and will eliminate bankruptcy because of healthcare bills.
 
Wrong ........... Medicare for All - means everyone will have full coverage, be healthier and will eliminate bankruptcy because of healthcare bills.

Under Medicare without adding costly Medicare Plus people today do not have full coverage.
 
Wrong ........... Medicare for All - means everyone will have full coverage, be healthier and will eliminate bankruptcy because of healthcare bills.
Thanks but you didn't address my point or tell me why it is wrong. You just spewed out a political talking point.
 
Under Medicare without adding costly Medicare Plus people today do not have full coverage.
80% coverage is better than some who are "under insured" for many thousands more dollars. If I need some time I cut a plan with the hospital or clinic as in payments this way my money goes DIRECTLY to the provider.

Medicare Plus is another insurance scam thanks to the house and senate.

Been doing this before I was eligible for Medicare ...... and I refused medical insurance coverage because it was over kill expensive. My dollars would be better applied to some need in the future. There are ways to get around to which it was a pleasure discovering.
 
Last edited:

Medicare for All a timely prescription​

And you thought the current inflation is bad. Medicare for all will DOUBLE federal spending on something that shouldn't be in federal government at all.
Other countries have figured it out
 
Other countries have figured it out
Other countries made it "law" and most likely many of their lawmakers are not invested as ours are in addition to accepting campaign money.
 
Back
Top Bottom