• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

media is lying to us or they're relaying lies - Charlie Kirk weapon used IS A LIE (prove me wrong)


I think the serial number business was some journalist rattling on about something of which he had only a dim awareness and others picked it up and ran with it because of their own ignorance. The same with .308 vs .30-06. They get confused on caliber vs cartridge quite often.
 
I still do not see enough to question the reported rifle, we are going to end up in conspiracy theory territory.
 
I still do not see enough to question the reported rifle, we are going to end up in conspiracy theory territory.

It wasn't a dreaded "assault weapon", but there was still some sort of narrative needed satisfied by whoever was writing the original, poorly informed copy.

"It's a German rifle! Possibly no serial numbers! A ghost rifle! A German ghost rifle! A NAZI ghost rifle perhaps! There are millions of them!"
 

All that aside for a moment, and assuming no plea deal, we are going to see a whole lot of evidence offered at trial and it will have to include the murder weapon, ballistics reports, etc. All the basics of forensics evidence used at trials like this showing the nature of the crime and the weapon used.

And I am not seeing enough to suggest some backtrack of what weapon was used.
 
lots of questions right ?
I am more inclined to think that the media are complete and utter idiots. They googled Mauser bolt action and got a Wiki about WW1.
 
Yup. Everytown is already talking about the need to ban “deadly sniper rifles”. I am surprised that the fudds aren’t out in force yet.
 

ok and that's fine but then we have to recognize/admit that nothing the media says is true about anything - it can all be guesses/mistakes/ignorance

like who the shooter is, what the motives are etc even
 

I see no reason to doubt it was something could be characterized as a Mauser rifle. As you say though, we shall see.
 
Yup. Everytown is already talking about the need to ban “deadly sniper rifles”. I am surprised that the fudds aren’t out in force yet.

Even the fudds aren't going to rail against bolt action rifles. They might be in a FAFO position considering their earlier toadying to extremist gun controllers.
 
ok and that's fine but then we have to recognize/admit that nothing the media says is true about anything - it can all be guesses/mistakes/ignorance

like who the shooter is, what the motives are etc even

Indeed, all that was in doubt on the early stages. That happens quite often. Journalists feel compelled to bloviate. Get the scoop! We see the same thing on this forum. Go back and read the threads in the immediate aftermath of the assassination.
 
Even the fudds aren't going to rail against bolt action rifles. They might be in a FAFO position considering their earlier toadying to extremist gun controllers.
Yup. First they came for the ARs. Then they came for the handguns. Then the bolt action rifles.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…