• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Maxwell Exhonerates Bill Clinton

Hillary strikes me as a woman driven almost exclusively by political power. I suspect that as long as she was getting ahead politically she'd have put up with anything.

It's documented in a film about her life. She was totally manipulative and power-driven from the very beginning of their relationship. A marriage of convenience.

 
So, this isn’t Bill Clinton getting a massage from Chauntae Davies, one of Epstein’s “sex slaves”. Sure looks like a Bill and sure looks like a massage from a young girl (in what looks like a small private airport terminal).

View attachment 67586073




Is he having sex with her in that picture?

I have heard her testimony. MAGAs have told us over and over again that "that's not evidence" and that we have no way of knowing any of these now-women (then-girls) are "credible." But either way, her testimony is about Epstein, not Clinton, correct?

Meanwhile...a pic of a fully dressed, seated massage with chairs between them, no less means what, again?

Also, what year is this pic? I actually don't know, that isn't a "gotcha." FWIW Chauntae was born in 1979.

(FTR, I DO believe these victims. And I believe Bill is a disgusting ****ing dog and I'm not sure what if anything I would realistically put past him. But by MAGA standards, this pic means less than nothing. Sorry, guys. These are your rules for determining guilt or innocence, remember? Testimony doesn't mean jack and this sure isn't any sort of compromising pic of the two of them touching in any untoward way...or even getting even partially undressed...not even in swimsuits.)
 
Last edited:
It's documented in a film about her life. She was totally manipulative and power-driven from the very beginning of their relationship. A marriage of convenience.



Yeah, and MAGAs just can't stand a "power-driven" woman, as we all know...

Now a power-driven, manipulative, greedy, adulterous, grabby, puking-rich man? Well, that's different. That's to be applauded.

As far as "it's documented in a film about her ilfe..." LOLOLOLOL

Thanks for your contribution.
 
So not Clinton or Trump. Who did she say was involved? Was she asked? What was the purpose of this interview anyway? Was she under oath? Very irregular and suspicious. Smells like corruption at the highest level of the justice system. It is always the attempted cover-up that exposes the crime.
 
Last edited:



Well, that's that. Clinton is clean.
She has to. She said during her trial that she never saw any abuse, that she and Epstein are both innocent. She would perjure herself if she says something esle now.
 
So, this isn’t Bill Clinton getting a massage from Chauntae Davies, one of Epstein’s “sex slaves”. Sure looks like a Bill and sure looks like a massage from a young girl (in what looks like a small private airport terminal).

View attachment 67586073


Who are you to question Jim Jordan.
 



Well, that's that. Clinton is clean.
People are going to believe what their going to believe regardless of what is or isn’t in the Epstein files. That their believe as far as I can tell is based on pure speculation and hope. I don’t know if there’s any damning evidence in those files against Trump and other republicans or against Bill Clinton and other democrats. Neither does anyone else know that there is outside of their belief and speculation, hope that there is.

This is one of those cases that even if the whole Epstein file is released, those who believe there was something in them that condemned whoever they wanted to be condemned, they’ll continue to believe the government held that condemnation evidence back. Didn’t release it. They may be right or they may be wrong, but whichever way it is, it’s not going to change anyone’s mind or beliefs. People will believe what they want to believe about the Epstein files, whether they’re right or wrong.
 
People are going to believe what their going to believe regardless of what is or isn’t in the Epstein files. That their believe as far as I can tell is based on pure speculation and hope. I don’t know if there’s any damning evidence in those files against Trump and other republicans or against Bill Clinton and other democrats. Neither does anyone else know that there is outside of their belief and speculation, hope that there is.

This is one of those cases that even if the whole Epstein file is released, those who believe there was something in them that condemned whoever they wanted to be condemned, they’ll continue to believe the government held that condemnation evidence back. Didn’t release it. They may be right or they may be wrong, but whichever way it is, it’s not going to change anyone’s mind or beliefs. People will believe what they want to believe about the Epstein files, whether they’re right or wrong.

As a teacher of 29 years, I will be the first to admit that our education system is incapable of teaching the difference between facts and opinions. We also failed in teaching critical thinking.
 
Specifically?
Epstein has been running this supposed child ring since the 90's. That means that the Clinton, BUsh, Obama, Trump and Biden departments of justice have failed to bring charges against anyone.
 
Epstein has been running this supposed child ring since the 90's. That means that the Clinton, BUsh, Obama, Trump and Biden departments of justice have failed to bring charges against anyone.
You're responding to the wrong person. I was asking about the specific government sources you mentioned in the post below.
Not just according to her but according to multiple US departments of Justice.
 
Yeah, and MAGAs just can't stand a "power-driven" woman, as we all know...

Now a power-driven, manipulative, greedy, adulterous, grabby, puking-rich man? Well, that's different. That's to be applauded.

As far as "it's documented in a film about her ilfe..." LOLOLOLOL

Thanks for your contribution.

No, that's not why I can't stand her.
Funny how you assign yourself as a mind reader.
 
Back
Top Bottom