- Joined
- Mar 29, 2012
- Messages
- 5,818
- Reaction score
- 924
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Masterpiece Cakeshop owner Jack Phillips is in court again, this time over allegations that his business unlawfully refused service to a transgender woman who requested trans-themed birthday cake. The plaintiff, Autumn Scardina, had*previously filed a complaint against Phillips*with the Colorado Civil Rights Commission and is now in the midst of a lawsuit at the district level.
Both actions stem from a call Scardina says she made to the Lakewood, Colorado, bakery on June 26, 2017 — the same day the Supreme Court announced it would take up a separate case involving Masterpiece Cakeshop’s refusal to make a same-sex wedding cake. Scardina, an attorney and activist, says she tried to order a pink cake with blue frosting, but that the bakery refused her request after she explained it was intended to recognize her identity as a transgender woman, according to court documents. She alleges that a representative of the Christian bakery told her it “did not make cakes for ‘sex changes.’”
Following Scardina’s first complaint, Phillips filed a countersuit against the Colorado Civil Rights Commission in August 2018, and he and the commission settled last March, agreeing to not move forward with the case. In a previous case, the seven-member commission had found Phillips in violation of the state’s nondiscrimination laws for refusing service to a gay couple who ordered a wedding cake in 2012 (the Supreme Court overturned the commission’s decision in a narrow 2018 ruling, finding that its members displayed “clear and impermissible hostility” to religion).
After the commission dropped Scardina’s case, she filed a separate lawsuit last June arguing that Masterpiece Cakeshop violated both Colorado’s Anti-Discrimination Act and the Colorado Consumer Protection Act. The complaint, filed with the District Court for the City and County of Denver, alleges that the business “refused to sell a birthday cake to Ms. Scardina because she is transgender despite repeatedly advertising that they would sell birthday cakes to the general public, including LGBT individuals.” The prior complaint clarifies that the cake was meant to celebrate both Scardina’s birthday, which is on July 7, and the seventh anniversary of her “transition from male to female.”
Scardina’s attorney, Paula Greisen, said that her client’s case shows that Masterpiece Cakeshop has been engaging in deceptive business practices, accusing the bakery of not being “honest with the public.”
“The dignity of all citizens in our state needs to be honored,” Greisen said in a statement when the case was originally filed last year. “Masterpiece Cakeshop said before the Supreme Court they would serve any baked good to members of the LGBTQ community. It was just the religious significance of it being a wedding cake.”
But in a Thursday hearing, Phillips’ attorneys requested that the Denver court immediately dismiss the lawsuit. Jake Warner, legal counsel with the Alliance Defending Freedom, said that Scardina should “have filed at the court of appeals” instead of filing a new lawsuit at the district court level. Warner claimed the “plaintiff wants to start the case all over and that isn’t fair to Mr. Phillips.”
Representatives with Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative Christian legal group that also represented Phillips in his case before the Supreme Court, said Scardina’s continued pursuit of the case is intended to “harass” Phillips over his religious beliefs. In a statement shared with NBC News, Kristen Waggoner, senior vice president of ADF’s U.S. legal division, said Phillips is being targeted “because he won’t create custom cakes that express messages or celebrate events in conflict with his conscience.”
“This attorney’s relentless pursuit of Jack was an obvious attempt to punish him for his views, banish him from the marketplace and financially ruin him and his shop,” Warner added.
Public accommodation laws are pretty clear. If you want to open your business to the public, you have to open it to the public. If you don't, you can hand select your clientele by any metric you choose. You don't get to... have your cake and eat it too.
On a moral note, there's literally nothing in the bible about the alleged sin of baking a cake for a homosexual and this guy is no different than a bigot who would hang a "No negroes" sign in front of his shop. Interacting with black people was also once claimed to be a violation of their religion by bigoted Christians. I'm glad we stopped tolerating that bull****.
Nobody should be forced to do business they don't want to do. The people pushing this lawsuit are scumbags looking for attention.
Government in PA just gave store owners the "right" to turn away customers ...
"... It dictates that businesses “require all customers to wear masks while on premises, and deny entry to individuals not wearing masks, ..."
Looks like government now uses businesses to dictate who will get food and who not ...
And what happens when the owners of the 2 grocery stores within 100 miles of a small town in Alabama decide they "don't like n***ers"? Just screw them right? The black people in town can either starve or move?
Public accommodation laws are pretty clear. If you want to open your business to the public, you have to open it to the public. If you don't, you can hand select your clientele by any metric you choose. You don't get to... have your cake and eat it too.
On a moral note, there's literally nothing in the bible about the alleged sin of baking a cake for a homosexual and this guy is no different than a bigot who would hang a "No negroes" sign in front of his shop. Interacting with black people was also once claimed to be a violation of their religion by bigoted Christians. I'm glad we stopped tolerating that bull****.
Public accommodation laws are pretty clear. If you want to open your business to the public, you have to open it to the public. If you don't, you can hand select your clientele by any metric you choose. You don't get to... have your cake and eat it too.
On a moral note, there's literally nothing in the bible about the alleged sin of baking a cake for a homosexual and this guy is no different than a bigot who would hang a "No negroes" sign in front of his shop. Interacting with black people was also once claimed to be a violation of their religion by bigoted Christians. I'm glad we stopped tolerating that bull****.
What if the request is for a NAMBLA cake? What if the customer wants a sexually graphic design? What if the customer is just plain being an asshole about everything? Can the owner adjust pricing at will and, for example, agree to do the cake but will charge $1M up front?
I've refused to do business with a number of potential customers over the years for a number of reasons and will continue to refuse the ones I believe will be trouble makers.
I'm not sure your imaginary scenario would happen in 2020 considering that even in the 50s black people had places to shop at in the south. The free market will reward business owners with enough sense to not discriminate. Big Brother is not needed.
I'm not sure your imaginary scenario would happen in 2020 considering that even in the 50s black people had places to shop at in the south. The free market will reward business owners with enough sense to not discriminate. Big Brother is not needed.
What's the rationale for refusing to bake a cake with blue and white frosting?
What's the rationale for refusing to bake a cake with blue and white frosting?
Public accommodation laws are pretty clear. If you want to open your business to the public, you have to open it to the public. If you don't, you can hand select your clientele by any metric you choose.
If the free market was enough to stop discrimination, we wouldn't have needed public acommodation laws in the first place.
If the free market was enough to stop discrimination, we wouldn't have needed public acommodation laws in the first place.
If the free market was enough to stop discrimination, we wouldn't have needed public acommodation laws in the first place.
What's the rationale for refusing to bake a cake with blue and white frosting?
That wasn't the reason for the refusal. If you read the article the significance of the cake went against the owner's religious beliefs, which is a federally protected right.
Being transgender doesn't grant one public accommodation priority. That's for handicapped people. Having a public business doesn't mean disrespectful idiots get to be served.
The Bible didn't talk about cakes, it talked about how homosexuality is a sin and details the consequences of those individuals. Creating false narratives won't suit you.
That wasn't the reason for the refusal. If you read the article the significance of the cake went against the owner's religious beliefs, which is a federally protected right.
What if the request is for a NAMBLA cake? What if the customer wants a sexually graphic design? What if the customer is just plain being an asshole about everything? Can the owner adjust pricing at will and, for example, agree to do the cake but will charge $1M up front?
I've refused to do business with a number of potential customers over the years for a number of reasons and will continue to refuse the ones I believe will be trouble makers.
People who support freedom of association believe no one should be forced into a contract with another person against their will. The issue is over what the law should be, not what currently is, so what you wrote above is irrelevant.
I'm not sure your imaginary scenario would happen in 2020 considering that even in the 50s black people had places to shop at in the south. The free market will reward business owners with enough sense to not discriminate. Big Brother is not needed.
Did the customer merely order a cake with blue and white frosting?
Who cares? The point is you shouldn't be forced to do business with anyone. The whole idea of forcing people into contracts against their will is so stupid and idiotic that it's amazing it has to be explained to anyone.
I'm forced to do business with people I don't like every day I go to work.
Please explain how the government forces you into contracts you don't want to enter.
As a grocery store, we're in the public domain, and that means we're not allowed to deny service to people simply because we don't like them. We need a no trespass order to bar them from the premises.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?