Look at you being all the perfect model of 'wing' hatred and stuff... Way to set the example.Uh, no.. I said we would need to become LESS tolerant of right wing hate. So MORE trying to close down the businesses of right wing hatemongers.
What could possibly be more right wing than beating up a Sikh because you thought he was Muslim and you hate Muslims? That's so right wing that even Bachmann would be a bit uncomfortable about it... Somebody who does that is hard core right wing by definition...
I don't even get what you guys are saying... You don't think beating up or killing people because they are from a different demographic background than you is right wing? What do you think social conservatism is about? ...snip....
I don't even get what you guys are saying... You don't think beating up or killing people because they are from a different demographic background than you is right wing? What do you think social conservatism is about? Killing somebody for being from a different demographic background than you are is the most extreme form of social conservatism. Maybe level one is wanting to favor your own demographic group in various ways (eg, pushing for government funding for religious organizations from your religion, seeking to have creationism taught in public schools, etc), level two is to try to get government to give clear indications that it considers your group superior to others (eg, English as a national language bills, banning cultural studies courses, etc), level three is seeking to oppress members of other demographic groups (eg, forbidding gay people from getting married, fighting not to allow mosques to be built, etc), level four is physical violence against other demographic groups, level fix is killing members of other demographic groups for being different than you. You see what I'm saying, right? I mean, certainly one can argue that the top couple levels are extreme enough to no longer be called "social conservatism", but it is all the same thing, just more and more extreme amounts of it, right?
This is not some strange aspect of a right wing ,conservative mindset....this is a crazy F@ck.
claiming a political opponent led to a shooting is just silly.
I don't even get what you guys are saying... You don't think beating up or killing people because they are from a different demographic background than you is right wing? What do you think social conservatism is about? Killing somebody for being from a different demographic background than you are is the most extreme form of social conservatism. Maybe level one is wanting to favor your own demographic group in various ways (eg, pushing for government funding for religious organizations from your religion, seeking to have creationism taught in public schools, etc), level two is to try to get government to give clear indications that it considers your group superior to others (eg, English as a national language bills, banning cultural studies courses, etc), level three is seeking to oppress members of other demographic groups (eg, forbidding gay people from getting married, fighting not to allow mosques to be built, etc), level four is physical violence against other demographic groups, level fix is killing members of other demographic groups for being different than you. You see what I'm saying, right? I mean, certainly one can argue that the top couple levels are extreme enough to no longer be called "social conservatism", but it is all the same thing, just more and more extreme amounts of it, right?
Look at you being all the perfect model of 'wing' hatred and stuff... Way to set the example.
Racism and violence is not in the sole possession of right wing groups.
You're just poisoning the well, by automatically ascribing these attributes to these people.
It's no different than, what than what the people you're attempting to profile, do.
Violence certainly is not the sole possession of right wing groups. Violence pops up all over the spectrum. But racism is inherently right wing. It is extreme social conservatism. That's what it is.
Violence certainly is not the sole possession of right wing groups. Violence pops up all over the spectrum. But racism is inherently right wing. It is extreme social conservatism. That's what it is.
The KKK was founded by Democrats.
Racism is not inherently right wing. It is inherent to humans, of all political leans.
For the 100th time Sikh =/= Islam.
"There are roughly 500,000 Sikhs in the U.S., according to estimates." wow
Sorry that's just not true.
But way to post material emulative of those you supposedly dislike so much.
Not sure how you mean. The fundamental proposition of social conservatism is "my demographic group is superior to those that differ from it". In its weakest form, that manifests as somewhat harmless things like wanting to teach creationism in school. In its strongest form, that manifests as concentration camps. It's all the same spectrum.
The KKK was founded by Democrats.
Do you by any chance have a source for this claim, or are you just making it up?
Not sure how you mean. The fundamental proposition of social conservatism is "my demographic group is superior to those that differ from it". In its weakest form, that manifests as somewhat harmless things like wanting to teach creationism in school. In its strongest form, that manifests as concentration camps. It's all the same spectrum.
What do you mean? I'm not sure I follow what part of it you disagree with.
Oh, I' afraid as it is studied more, it is becoming apparent that racism is inherent within RW authoritarian ideology.The KKK was founded by Democrats.
Racism is not inherently right wing. It is inherent to humans, of all political leans.
Umm no it's not.
Now you're just making things up.
Social conservatism is dependent on who runs each group and on what values the group wants to preserve.
Nice try though, trying to shoe horn Nazism into social conservatism.
How can you say that? Leftists love everybody.
Leftists don't love white Christian males.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?