Many climate change scientists do not agree that global warming is happening

[longview]

Proven your position wrong with citation.

Why haven’t you published your paper yet, disproving the entire scientific community? You keep running from this question for some reason
[/
Which is a lie because you don’t have a single citation in this thread!

 

[Lord of Planar]

Oh, for God's sake... when are you going to quit being a complete hypocrite? You do far worse when you automatically disregard NASA articles, Wikipedia articles, and anything not written by a scientist.

I do not automatically disregard them. There are threads of truth in good lies.

You disregard the opposing view of other scientists that might just have it right.

You have even taken to disregarding IPCC reports even though you know everything in them is based on science and written by scientists. Hell... you disregard anything that doesn't say what you want it to say.

I have the scientoifc knowledge to understand and think fot myself. To see past the agenda and its lies.

Everyone who knows anything about climate science and is honest about it knows that people who regularly push denialist lies and misinformation should not be taken seriously. So... people who do this should be ostracized and blacklisted. And that includes people like you.

How would you know? There you go making up things again.

 

[gboisjo]

The paper the article refers to only models that is was possible. It does not say it was likely habitable. In their model, values of water and other components were chosen to make it possible. The likelihood of it actually being habitual is very slim.

Of course models, models and scientific theories are all we have to go on with Venus. We do know the sun was much cooler in its early years and its getting hotter as time goes by.

All the more likely that deep natural cooling cycles on Earth will not occur, billions of years from now the sun will actually burn our planet to a crisp.

Astro Physicist Neil deGrasse Tyson had this to say about Venus>

Venus has a runaway greenhouse effect. I kind of want to know what happened there because we're twirling knobs here on Earth without knowing the consequences of it. Mars once had running water. It's bone dry today. Something bad happened there as well.

As far as Mars is concerned we have proof that Mars had lakes and rivers in its past. Mar's molten core did the planet in, planet was simply to small to maintain a hot core as a result the sun did it in.

Today Venus has a dry, oxygen-poor atmosphere. But recent studies have proposed that the early planet may have had liquid water and reflective clouds that could have sustained habitable conditions. Researchers at the University of Chicago, Department of Geophysical Sciences, have built a new time-dependent model of Venus's atmospheric composition to explore these claims. Their findings have been published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Venus could have had oceans long after life started on Earth

Today Venus has a dry, oxygen-poor atmosphere. But recent studies have proposed that the early planet may have had liquid water and reflective clouds that could have sustained habitable conditions. Researchers at the University of Chicago, Department of Geophysical Sciences, have built a new...

phys.org

 

[Lord of Planar]

I understand what is possible. It just isn't likely.

 

[Buzz]

I do not automatically disregard them.

Oh, please... don't lie. You do this all the time.

There are threads of truth in good lies.

I don't know what the heck you are talking about.

You disregard the opposing view of other scientists that might just have it right.

I disregard the views of obvious climate change deniers.

I have the scientoifc knowledge to understand and think fot myself.

You have the scientific knowledge to rationalize what you want to believe.

To see past the agenda and its lies.

What lies? I have never seen you or anyone else show that anything in the IPCC reports are lies.

How would you know?

I have been debunking denialist lies and misinformation for about 20 years now.

There you go making up things again.

I'm not making up anything. That is what you do.

 

[Lord of Planar]

Oh, please... don't lie. You do this all the time.

I don't know what the heck you are talking about.

I disregard the views of obvious climate change deniers.

You have the scientific knowledge to rationalize what you want to believe.

What lies? I have never seen you or anyone else show that anything in the IPCC reports are lies.

I have been debunking denialist lies and misinformation for about 20 years now.

I'm not making up anything. That is what you do.

Wow.

So many words, and nothing but silliness.

 

[Lord of Planar]

Oh, please... don't lie. You do this all the time.

I disredard the information after careful consideration. You outright deny it with no consideration.

I don't know what the heck you are talking about.

LOL...

I was stating that even in bogus material, there are facts within it. that is what makes a good lie. Base it on facts. The agenda is constantly doing that.

I disregard the views of obvious climate change deniers.

You disregard without consideration. This is why you are a science denier.

You have the scientific knowledge to rationalize what you want to believe.

You are just jealous because you cannot understand the stuff I speak of.

What lies? I have never seen you or anyone else show that anything in the IPCC reports are lies.

Lies by omission. Lies by cherry picking. Purposely using unscientific metrics to scare policy makers into submission.

I have demonstrated many aspects of what technically is a lie.

I have been debunking denialist lies and misinformation for about 20 years now.

No, you don't even know what a real denier is, and if you do, you are intentionally slandering me.

What you call a denier is anyone who does not share your cult-like belief.

I'm not making up anything. That is what you do.

LOL...

Keep telling yourself that.

LOL.

 

[Threegoofs]

I disredard the information after careful consideration. You outright deny it with no consideration.

LOL...

I was stating that even in bogus material, there are facts within it. that is what makes a good lie. Base it on facts. The agenda is constantly doing that.

You disregard without consideration. This is why you are a science denier.

You are just jealous because you cannot understand the stuff I speak of.

Lies by omission. Lies by cherry picking. Purposely using unscientific metrics to scare policy makers into submission.

I have demonstrated many aspects of what technically is a lie.

No, you don't even know what a real denier is, and if you do, you are intentionally slandering me.

What you call a denier is anyone who does not share your cult-like belief.

LOL...

Keep telling yourself that.

LOL.

You’re not fooling anyone, except yourself.

Really.