At 2:30 you see the deliberate crushing of him. That man had done exactly nothing. He was crushed, beaten and tazered more times that can be counted. No charges against the officers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ku4...to stop.[/FONT][/COLOR][/B][/INDENT][/INDENT]
Are you admitting cops are almost all crooked and that's why their "attracted" to criminals?Like tends to attract like.
from the OP article
"Orta was indicted on weapons charges after an arrest on Aug. 2 in the St. George neighborhood of Staten Island."
His arrest has nothing to do with the filming. I imagine a defense attorney will claim they are related somehow. Seems Orta is of the "not my fault" crowed. Don't carry a weapon unless your authorized.
Who is that? What convicted felon with a gun on him?
What do you think law enforcement officials should do when they see someone committing a miksdemeanor, go to issue a citation, and the individual that is committing the misdemeanor refuses to so much as provide a name, let alone accept a citation? How do you see things going once people realize that they can just blow off cops and have absolutely no responsibility for misdemeanor crimes and no consequence or repercussion whatsoever?
Who the hell are you?
great. but what if they wont stop and wont even give you Jose Ramirez? And what happens to law and order when people realize there is no consequence to breaking the law?
Thats why I decided not to go into teaching...but...not really the point. You mention the happy medium, which is REALLY your way of avoiding the point. The point is...if you allow lawlessness, bad **** happens. They did not approach Garner to choke him because he was selling cigarettes illegally. They didnt approach him necessarily to arrest him. He did not get put to the ground because he was accused of legally selling cigarettes. For all we know, they would have issued a citation and that would have been the end of it. Does it look like Mr Garner was in any way shape or form receptive to being issued a citation, politely or otherwise? THEN what? Just ignore it because the lawbreaker says 'leave me alone'?I think there is a happy medium between asking politely and delivering a chokehold. If you don't agree then let me just say I hope you're not a school teacher.
Geeeeezus....the drama....Curious that you think that the only option if a person is committing a misdemeanor or minor offense that they must be violently assaulted and beaten to death because you see no other option. :roll:
Did the police set up the wife to slap somebody or did she actually slap somebody?
Nope, however in threat assessment a random criminal has a lower probability of negatively affecting me than the government. So probably should err on the side of caution against the government, statistically speaking.
What do you think law enforcement officials should do when they see someone committing a miksdemeanor, go to issue a citation, and the individual that is committing the misdemeanor refuses to so much as provide a name, let alone accept a citation? How do you see things going once people realize that they can just blow off cops and have absolutely no responsibility for misdemeanor crimes and no consequence or repercussion whatsoever?
In order to ascertain 'coincidence' we have to know a little about the facts. Its rather obvious from the husbands arrest history he is committing criminal acts that he is getting caught at approximately every 2-3 months (27 arrests in a relatively short period of time). By his on record, his arrest wold certainly be considered "normal" for him. Correct? Now....to the wife...Did the police set up the wife to slap somebody or did she actually slap somebody? If she actually slapped someone, then there is no conspiracy. So...to answer the question, I will ask again....I guess you won't answer the question about coincidence.
Keep deflecting and excusing corrupt cops.
In order to ascertain 'coincidence' we have to know a little about the facts. Its rather obvious from the husbands arrest history he is committing criminal acts that he is getting caught at approximately every 2-3 months (27 arrests in a relatively short period of time). By his on record, his arrest wold certainly be considered "normal" for him. Correct? Now....to the wife...Did the police set up the wife to slap somebody or did she actually slap somebody? If she actually slapped someone, then there is no conspiracy. So...to answer the question, I will ask again....
Did the police set up the wife to slap somebody or did she actually slap somebody?
Are you admitting cops are almost all crooked and that's why their "attracted" to criminals?
Oh, just shoot them.
I mean, its a slippery slope, if you let them sell illegal cigarettes, then the next thing you know they will be raping children.
FFS, you have no idea how policing works and you're trying to defend an execution. You don't use a choke hold on a man who shows no signs of violence. Ever. In civilized countries, police arew restricted to using force one degree higher than the threat against them or civilians. If there is no threat, they cannot use violence, merely restrictive holds, if necessary.
Don't give me the danger ****, policing is far far safer than a career as a mental health professional, a construction worker or even pilot.
Your scenario is ludicrous, as its the law, you must identify yourself to a police officer or face charges of obstruction of justice, which is a felony. That gives them the right to make an arrest then and there.
If citations are not effective, that is a matter to be debated and fixed, you do not become legalized vigilantes dispensing a level of justice YOU think appropriate.
FFS, conservatives go ape**** every time Obama thinks about an executive order, whine and whine about he's shredding the constitution, but at the first sign of criticism of a cop, you're willing to throw out the whole bill of rights.
I think there is a happy medium between asking politely and delivering a chokehold. If you don't agree then let me just say I hope you're not a school teacher.
Its not even SLIGHTLY a deflection. The male suspect gets arrested every few months. In order to ascertain coincidence or conspiracy, you need to answer ONE SIMPLE QUESTION. Did the police set up the wife to slap somebody or did she actually slap somebody?Nice...
That is an award winning deflection.
But, it makes no sense whatsoever. You just proved he was "known to police" and they could nail him pretty easy to get even.
Curious that you think that the only option if a person is committing a misdemeanor or minor offense that they must be violently assaulted and beaten to death because you see no other option. :roll:
It wouldn't be that hard for cops to toss a weapon into a guy's car, or an eight ball of coke, and make up charges. Happens all the time, especially in NY state.
Basically if the cops have it out for you the only thing you can do is leave town.
Actually no. Statistically speaking that ONE random criminal has just as much chance of affecting you personally as that ONE random cop.
Nope, government policies are broad reaching. Since the problems with the poli e departments are nationwide, we're talking an aggregate breakdown in proper threat assessment. It's not just one cop, government is not 1. It's like saying I shouldn't worry about airport security because one TSA agent over there won't be a problem. But there's more than one and I have to deal with them whenever I fly.
Government has always been the number one threat to freedom and liberty. A necessity, yes, but one we're meant to keep a very close eye on.
So, you show you not only do not understand statistical probability, but you also don't understand police departments. Try as you might, those departments are local, have local rules and policies and are under local control.
Nice...
That is an award winning deflection.
But, it makes no sense whatsoever. You just proved he was "known to police" and they could nail him pretty easy to get even.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?