Nope, but they do get those other tickets. But you claimed he shouldn't get ANY punishment. Burnouts come with consequences when done on a public road and you're caught.Nobody gets felony charges for doing wheelies.
Nobody gets felony charges for doing wheelies.
He shouldn't get any jail time at all, and the felony should be thrown out. But fines and perhaps community service.The felony charge shouldn't even stand. He shouldn't be in jail for very long, at in prison at all.
Everywhere. Now I guess you’re pretending you’ve never seen skid marks on any paved surface
He shouldn't get any jail time at all, and the felony should be thrown out. But fines and perhaps community service.
Nobody gets felony charges for doing wheelies.
A law was passed to specifically make this type of act a felony. It's not just a normal vandalism charge. He defaced a public monument. Republicans intentionally made that a felony to protect confederate statues.
Paint on a public street is not a monument.A law was passed to specifically make this type of act a felony. It's not just a normal vandalism charge. He defaced a public monument. Republicans intentionally made that a felony to protect confederate statues.
Well that seems to have backfired.A law was passed to specifically make this type of act a felony. It's not just a normal vandalism charge. He defaced a public monument. Republicans intentionally made that a felony to protect confederate statues.
Sure. He doesn't agree with you so it's best if he's locked away from society as a whole and you in particular. We all get your concept of "justice".
Paint on a public street is not a monument.
So the enhancement was due to "prejudice" and that's a political determination. Look, if you want to throw felony violations at people for "prejudice" then do so when they burn and loot due to prejudice against cops too. This one sided "justice" system is destructive and intended to be destructive. This type of charging one person one way and other people another for comparable levels of offense is itself prejudicial.Mmm...no... It had nothing to do with agreeing. From the article, here's what he was charged with:
He could have, you know, just driven his vehicle without doing a burnout....no need to agree or disagree with anything...just drive your vehicle in such a way as to comply with the law.
But, just to get a sense of your concept of "justice", what should happen to people who break the law?
So the enhancement was due to "prejudice" and that's a political determination. Look, if you want to throw felony violations at people for "prejudice" then do so when they burn and loot due to prejudice against cops too. This one sided "justice" system is destructive and intended to be destructive. This type of charging one person one way and other people another for comparable levels of offense is itself prejudicial.
Paint on a public street is not a monument.
Painted stripes are not a monument.A law was passed to specifically make this type of act a felony. It's not just a normal vandalism charge. He defaced a public monument. Republicans intentionally made that a felony to protect confederate statues.
Says who?
The law says nothing of the sort.The law passed by Republicans says it is. Take it up with them.
Painted stripes are not a monument.
The law passed by Republicans says it is. Take it up with them.
I would think...the public....?
The guy is an idiot no doubt, unsafe driving for sure.....
But just because a county commission or city council decide to paint on the street....or on a wall......etc, doesn't make it a public monument.
Reckless driving is a misdemeanor. Add to that it looks like he did it specifically to do damage. I'm not against a little jail time (hours, not days) to show him this is serious and to observe what's going on with him.He shouldn't get any jail time at all, and the felony should be thrown out. But fines and perhaps community service.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?