- Joined
- Aug 10, 2013
- Messages
- 25,644
- Reaction score
- 32,755
- Location
- Cambridge, MA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
Uh oh, cracks are forming between MAGA and MAHA over the deregulate-Big-Business-at-all-costs reality of MAGA vs. the MAHA aspiration of ridding the country of toxins. In the end the big business donors will always win.
Pesticides test MAHA, MAGA alliance
Pesticides test MAHA, MAGA alliance
MAHA-aligned groups and influencers are raising alarms about provisions in a House appropriations bill they say will shield pesticide and chemical manufacturers from accountability — and ultimately make Americans less healthy.
Meanwhile, a draft of the administration’s “MAHA Report” on children’s health reportedly omits any calls to prevent pesticide exposure, also disappointing advocates.
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and his disciples espouse stricter environmental protections, while also bucking mainstream science on vaccine safety. Conservatives have traditionally sided with big business, supporting fewer regulations on potentially toxic substances.
So far, business interests appear to be winning. The industry-friendly draft of a report from a commission run by Kennedy shows just how much the White House has been able to rein him in.
While the pesticide issues have generated some sparks between MAHA and MAGA, the administration has taken a number of other actions to also reduce restrictions on the chemical industry more broadly.
Trump himself exempted from environmental standards more than 100 polluters, including chemical manufacturers, oil refineries, coal plants and medical device sterilizers.
The EPA, meanwhile, has put chemical industry alumni in leading roles and has said it wants to loosen restrictions on emissions of various cancer-linked chemicals.