Grokmaster
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2017
- Messages
- 9,613
- Reaction score
- 2,735
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
1.) The continued claim that , somehow, in the feverish imaginings of Leftgoofyworld, Mueller "found Trump Russia collusion."
He SPECIFICALLY STATES that HE DID NOT.
2.) The NEW LIE, that "Mueller told Congress to investigate PRes.Trump."
Complete and TOTAL BULL****... the report says NO SUCH THING, and NOTHING EVEN REMOTELY CLOSE TO THAT WAS SAID.
3.) The ridiculous claim that Congress is "ENTITLED" to whatever the House Dunce-o-crat Politburo decides they want. The LEGAL REALITY is that the USAG wasn't evne reuwitre to show Congress a SYLLABLE of the report, BY LAW, by chose to do so by his own volition. The Special Counsel report is required to be made to the USAG....PERIOD. And he did a great job of doing so, redacting only what was required by law.
4.) That the report DID NTO DEBUNK the DOSSIER: It absolutely CRUSHED the "main pints" of the dossier, as well as the sick, "porn" bull**** that the left has been "circle-jerking" over for two years.
These and the rest of the FAKE NEWS/LEFT LIES will continue from the STILL-TRAUMATIZED LEFT, even after Barr's and Mueller's upcoming testimony further SENDS THEM DOWN IN FLAMES...wait and see....the left just CANNOT HELP ITSELF.
Could you fix your capslock key please? Randomly all capitalized words make your posts look like a ransom note.
Also, your spin is hilariously bad. Are the schools in Russia really that bad?
Only "RANDOM" to the reading impaired, who have never seen a newspaper.
Edited in a second too late..AS PREDICTABLE AS THE SUNRISE!! :lamo
"Get ready for "FONT!!" "CAPS!!!" "NYAH NYAH NYAH NYAH POO-POO!!", etc. as the volley of off-topic/dodge the subject/utter failure to address much less refute the points made/ DP LEFT POSTS ensue, as they. most assuredly , will. "
1.) The continued claim that , somehow, in the feverish imaginings of Leftgoofyworld, Mueller "found Trump Russia collusion."
He SPECIFICALLY STATES that HE DID NOT.
2.) The NEW LIE, that "Mueller told Congress to investigate PRes.Trump."
Complete and TOTAL BULL****... the report says NO SUCH THING, and NOTHING EVEN REMOTELY CLOSE TO THAT WAS SAID.
3.) The ridiculous claim that Congress is "ENTITLED" to whatever the House Dunce-o-crat Politburo decides they want. The LEGAL REALITY is that the USAG wasn't evne reuwitre to show Congress a SYLLABLE of the report, BY LAW, by chose to do so by his own volition. The Special Counsel report is required to be made to the USAG....PERIOD. And he did a great job of doing so, redacting only what was required by law.
The SCOTUS established as far back as 1957 that Congress is NOT A LAW ENFORCEMENT entity, and does not get to demand "evidence " to try to "FIND CRIMES" it hopes are there: In 1957, the Supreme Court held in Watkins v. U.S. that a congressional information demand must relate to a “legitimate task of the Congress” and noted that Congress is not a “law enforcement agency” that can seek information to uncover or expose crimes.
4.) That the report DID NOT DEBUNK the DOSSIER: It absolutely CRUSHED the "main pints" of the dossier, as well as the sick, "porn" bull**** that the left has been "circle-jerking" over for two years.
These and the rest of the FAKE NEWS/LEFT LIES will continue from the STILL-TRAUMATIZED LEFT, even after Barr's and Mueller's upcoming testimony further SENDS THEM DOWN IN FLAMES...wait and see....the left just CANNOT HELP ITSELF.
Get ready for "FONT!!" "CAPS!!!" "NYAH NYAH NYAH NYAH POO-POO!!", etc. as the volley of off-topic/dodge the subject/utter failure to address much less refute the points made/ DP LEFT POSTS ensue, as they. most assuredly , will.
I have talked the actual composition of the report in multiple threads, including what it actually does and does not say. Those conversations bear no resemblance to what you claim "the left" is saying. I take serious threads seriously. Silly meme ransom note threads, not so much.
meanwhile, in the real world:
trump approval drops 3 points to 2019 low after release of mueller report: Reuters/ipsos poll
trump approval drops 3 points to 2019 low after release of mueller report: Reuters/ipsos poll - reuters
They are PRECISELY what the left is saying....look at the threads on THIS FORUM.
NONE of the DP LEFT admits that the entire RUSSIA COLLUSION LIE was BULL****...it was/is.
NONE CONCEDE what Mueller PLAINLY STATED ABOUT THE DOSSIER's claims.
NONE appear to understand the ACTUAL LAW/RULES regarding Special Counsel reports, or the LIMITS of CONGRESSIONAL DEMANDS.
My POINTS STAND.
( PS- People who "take threads seriously" don't comment on FONT/CAPS or other long established methods of print emphasis, as a CHILDISH DEFLECTION.. )
What Mueller didn't find was enough evidence to convict on criminal conspiracy charges. He found and detailed at least 6 incidences of collusion. And THAT was largely because of the Obstruction he absolutely detailed
gasp!! A leftist poll found trump's approval rating dropped!! Surely not!!!
View attachment 67255457
NOW, TRY TO POST ON TOPIC JUST TO STUN YOUR FELLOW DP LEFTISTS....
1.) The continued claim that , somehow, in the feverish imaginings of Leftgoofyworld, Mueller "found Trump Russia collusion."
He SPECIFICALLY STATES that HE DID NOT.
2.) The NEW LIE, that "Mueller told Congress to investigate PRes.Trump."
Complete and TOTAL BULL****... the report says NO SUCH THING, and NOTHING EVEN REMOTELY CLOSE TO THAT WAS SAID.
3.) The ridiculous claim that Congress is "ENTITLED" to whatever the House Dunce-o-crat Politburo decides they want. The LEGAL REALITY is that the USAG wasn't evne reuwitre to show Congress a SYLLABLE of the report, BY LAW, by chose to do so by his own volition. The Special Counsel report is required to be made to the USAG....PERIOD. And he did a great job of doing so, redacting only what was required by law.
The SCOTUS established as far back as 1957 that Congress is NOT A LAW ENFORCEMENT entity, and does not get to demand "evidence " to try to "FIND CRIMES" it hopes are there: In 1957, the Supreme Court held in Watkins v. U.S. that a congressional information demand must relate to a “legitimate task of the Congress” and noted that Congress is not a “law enforcement agency” that can seek information to uncover or expose crimes.
4.) That the report DID NOT DEBUNK the DOSSIER: It absolutely CRUSHED the "main pints" of the dossier, as well as the sick, "porn" bull**** that the left has been "circle-jerking" over for two years.
These and the rest of the FAKE NEWS/LEFT LIES will continue from the STILL-TRAUMATIZED LEFT, even after Barr's and Mueller's upcoming testimony further SENDS THEM DOWN IN FLAMES...wait and see....the left just CANNOT HELP ITSELF.
Get ready for "FONT!!" "CAPS!!!" "NYAH NYAH NYAH NYAH POO-POO!!", etc. as the volley of off-topic/dodge the subject/utter failure to address much less refute the points made/ DP LEFT POSTS ensue, as they. most assuredly , will.
Mueller's Definition of 'Collusion', Will be Clear
One legal question looms larger than others over special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of Donald Trump’s presidential campaign and its possible Russia connections: What laws, exactly, would be violated by collusion if it could be shown?
Remember that the word “collusion” itself has no formal legal status in this investigation. No relevant federal criminal statute that I know of makes “collusion” -- as opposed to conspiracy -- a crime. The letter appointing Mueller directs him to investigate “links and/or coordination” between Russia and the campaign, with no mention of “collusion.”
A potentially applicable criminal law is 52 U.S.C. 30121, which governs campaign contributions by foreign nationals. It makes it a crime for a foreign national to make a “contribution or donation of money or other thing of value” to a campaign -- and a crime for an American to “solicit, accept, or receive” such a contribution.
1.) The continued claim that , somehow, in the feverish imaginings of Leftgoofyworld, Mueller "found Trump Russia collusion."
He SPECIFICALLY STATES that HE DID NOT.
2.) The NEW LIE, that "Mueller told Congress to investigate PRes.Trump."
Complete and TOTAL BULL****... the report says NO SUCH THING, and NOTHING EVEN REMOTELY CLOSE TO THAT WAS SAID.
3.) The ridiculous claim that Congress is "ENTITLED" to whatever the House Dunce-o-crat Politburo decides they want. The LEGAL REALITY is that the USAG wasn't evne reuwitre to show Congress a SYLLABLE of the report, BY LAW, by chose to do so by his own volition. The Special Counsel report is required to be made to the USAG....PERIOD. And he did a great job of doing so, redacting only what was required by law.
The SCOTUS established as far back as 1957 that Congress is NOT A LAW ENFORCEMENT entity, and does not get to demand "evidence " to try to "FIND CRIMES" it hopes are there: In 1957, the Supreme Court held in Watkins v. U.S. that a congressional information demand must relate to a “legitimate task of the Congress” and noted that Congress is not a “law enforcement agency” that can seek information to uncover or expose crimes.
4.) That the report DID NOT DEBUNK the DOSSIER: It absolutely CRUSHED the "main pints" of the dossier, as well as the sick, "porn" bull**** that the left has been "circle-jerking" over for two years.
These and the rest of the FAKE NEWS/LEFT LIES will continue from the STILL-TRAUMATIZED LEFT, even after Barr's and Mueller's upcoming testimony further SENDS THEM DOWN IN FLAMES...wait and see....the left just CANNOT HELP ITSELF.
Get ready for "FONT!!" "CAPS!!!" "NYAH NYAH NYAH NYAH POO-POO!!", etc. as the volley of off-topic/dodge the subject/utter failure to address much less refute the points made/ DP LEFT POSTS ensue, as they. most assuredly , will.
Meanwhile, in the real world:
Trump approval drops 3 points to 2019 low after release of Mueller report: Reuters/Ipsos poll
Trump approval drops 3 points to 2019 low after release of Mueller report: Reuters/Ipsos poll - Reuters
He wasnt invited to be there?First of all - LOVE the font-tination! Very nicely done! I'm thinking of making:
""FONT!!" "CAPS!!!" "NYAH NYAH NYAH NYAH POO-POO!!"
My new signature.
Serious question: Why do you think Mueller wasn't one of the people standing behind Barr during Friday's press conference?
He wasnt invited to be there?
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
What Mueller didn't find was enough evidence to convict on criminal conspiracy charges. He found and detailed at least 6 incidences of collusion. And THAT was largely because of the Obstruction he absolutely detailed
His tweets seem to suggest that he still feels the report exonerates him. What are you seeing in them thst i am missing?The rational should be wondering about the president* mental state, back in March following AG Barr's 4 page letter to Congress, we could read President Trump claims ‘complete and total exoneration’; read AG Barr’s full letter regarding Special Counsel’s Report
Then yesterday, for some reason tRump tweeted several times - probably when he was waiting for Rush to tee up on the golf course. Trump finally finishes Mueller report tweet rant over 8 hours later
This morning the tweet rants continued, Trump launches new rant about Mueller report in Twitter meltdown against ‘true Trump Haters’
If he once thought he was "totally exonerated", after all he did write that he had read Barr's "full letter", why now is tRump exhibiting the actions of a guilty person, one denying reality in the hopes that the gullible will believe the Dear Leader?
I dont know. I offered it as a possible explanationWas he?
20 ongoing federal and state investigations
14 referred Mueller prosecutions
2+ ongoing counterintelligence investigations
1 pending impeachable felony charge in NYC
1 pending impeachable felony before Congress
100+ Congressional subpoenas coming
I LOVE how much pain this causes you.
And, yeah, the Mueller report did tell Congress to investigate and impeach Twumpie.
Nice fail, btw.
Meanwhile, in the real world:
Trump approval drops 3 points to 2019 low after release of Mueller report: Reuters/Ipsos poll
Trump approval drops 3 points to 2019 low after release of Mueller report: Reuters/Ipsos poll - Reuters
Only "RANDOM" to the reading impaired, who have never seen a newspaper.
Edited in a second too late..AS PREDICTABLE AS THE SUNRISE!! :lamo
"Get ready for "FONT!!" "CAPS!!!" "NYAH NYAH NYAH NYAH POO-POO!!", etc. as the volley of off-topic/dodge the subject/utter failure to address much less refute the points made/ DP LEFT POSTS ensue, as they. most assuredly , will. "
View attachment 67255455
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?