Lies of Abortion Supporters

[MrWonderful]

1. It's a woman's right to "choose". Big lie.
A. It's not her body she is having butchered. It's a new, unique human being, with half the DNA of its father.
B. Fathers should have a choice. Proabortionists deny them their choice to have and hold and raise their child. Fathers may have to pay child support for 18 years, and they certainly have no "choice" there either.
C. In China, tens of millions of women have had their female babies butchered. This is called "barbaric" by proabortionists and they are correct. They simply don't apply their standards to women who have boys and girls butchered.

2. Roe v. Wade began with the lie that Norma McCorvey was raped. She perjured her testimony. It should be overturned based on perjured testimony.

3. "My body, my 'choice'."
Big, huge lie. That unique DNA is NOT the killer's body.

4. Many adults who are alive today survived botched abortions and they are very glad to have done so, as are their temporarily insane mothers.

5. Draw a line, left to right. Label the left origin "conception" and the right end "full term delivery" at 9 months on this time line. Now draw a vertical line somewhere through the horizontal line where YOU contend that on the left side, this human can be slaughtered, but one second later, it cannot. Justify your absurd claim with science, and logic.
(You cannot.)

 

[Dragonfly]

1. It's a woman's right to "choose". Big lie.
A. It's not her body she is having butchered. It's a new, unique human being, with half the DNA of its father.
B. Fathers should have a choice. Proabortionists deny them their choice to have and hold and raise their child.
C. In China, tens of millions of women have had their female babies butchered. This is called "barbaric" by proabortionists and they are correct. They simply don't apply their standards to women who have boys and girls butchered.

2. Roe v. Wade began with the lie that Norma McCorvey was raped. She perjured her testimony. It should be overturned
based on perjured testimony.

3. "My body, my 'choice'."
Big, huge lie. That unique DNA is NOT the killer's body.

4. Many adults who are alive today survived botched abortions and they are very glad to have done so, as are their temporarily insane mothers.

5. Draw a line, left to right. Label the left origin "conception" and the right end "full term delivery" at 9 months on this time line. Now draw a vertical line somewhere through the horizontal line where YOU contend that on the left side, this human can be slaughtered, but one second later, it cannot. Justify your absurd claim with science, and logic.
(You cannot.)

Shocking...another DUDE posting trash, lies, and idiocy regarding something medical he'll never have to directly deal with.

 

[MrWonderful]

Shocking...another DUDE posting trash, lies, and idiocy regarding something medical he'll never have to directly deal with.

1. I have reported your offensive and childish post. The authorities of this site may not choose to ban you, but they should.
2. None of us have to "deal with" anyone who is murdered. You don't seem to care in the least about anyone who is murdered because you don't have to "deal with" those killed. You have no compassion, no conscience whatever.
3. I created a website pointing out injustices of many murders of whites by blacks - not that you care or have to "deal with" any of them.

White Lives Don't Matter

whitelivesdontmatter.blogspot.com

 

[Peter King]

1. It's a woman's right to "choose". Big lie.
A. It's not her body she is having butchered. It's a new, unique human being, with half the DNA of its father.
B. Fathers should have a choice. Proabortionists deny them their choice to have and hold and raise their child.
C. In China, tens of millions of women have had their female babies butchered. This is called "barbaric" by proabortionists and they are correct. They simply don't apply their standards to women who have boys and girls butchered.

So women do not have the right to do the same thing as men get to do?
a. what body would be butchered? A ZEF has no right to anything. Also, not a human being because that is what happens after birth. Also, her body, her uterus, her right to choose.
b. As soon as men have a uterus and will carry the ZEF he will have the right to choose, until then, tough luck for men if they have impregnated someone
c. what happens in China has nothing to do with freedom of choice, women are not being free to choice so it has nothing to do with our discussion.

2. Roe v. Wade began with the lie that Norma McCorvey was raped. She perjured her testimony. It should be overturned
based on perjured testimony.

Doesn't change the reality that Roe v. Wade determined that the government has no right to interfere in their early part of the pregnancy of any woman.

Also, her alleged gang-rape also had no bearing on the outcome of the case, how she got pregnant was not the issue, the issue was that the government interjected her into the private decision about her body/pregnancy without there being any legal right or justification.

3. "My body, my 'choice'."
Big, huge lie. That unique DNA is NOT the killer's body.

Except it is not a lie, you may disagree with that but to call it a lie is, well a big fat lie.
And last time I checked her uterus was her body, what is gestating in her uterus has no rights, especially not the right to life over the freedom of choice of the woman.

4. Many adults who are alive today survived botched abortions and they are very glad to have done so, as are their temporarily insane mothers.

Many adults? Virtually no abortions end up in "survival" especially not when discussing elective abortion, which is what the freedom of choice really is all about. Late abortions that could lead to survivals but late abortions are generally done for medical reasons and survival is mostly already not possible as the fetus is severely deformed or is not believed to be able to survive birth.

5. Draw a line, left to right. Label the left origin "conception" and the right end "full term delivery" at 9 months on this time line. Now draw a vertical line somewhere through the horizontal line where YOU contend that on the left side, this human can be slaughtered, but one second later, it cannot. Justify your absurd claim with science, and logic.
(You cannot.)

Abortion is not "slaughtering" a human being. And abortion IMO should be able to week 16, but 2 weeks later can be discussed but that is between a doctor and the patient.

 

[Phys251]

1. It's a woman's right to "choose". Big lie.

Except, it is.

A. It's not her body she is having butchered.

Anti-choicers love to use hyperbolic language to paint their opponents as aggressors and themselves as benevolent, when in truth it's the other way around.

It's a new, unique human being,

A ZEF is a human?

with half the DNA of its father.

Not if it has XY chromosomes.

B. Fathers should have a choice.

They do. It's called not having intercourse.

Proabortionists

There are no such thing.

deny them their choice to have and hold and raise their child.

If the man wants to have sex but the woman doesn't, what then?

Fathers may have to pay child support for 18 years, and they certainly have no "choice" there either.

No intercourse = no baby = no child support. The man has that choice.

C. In China, tens of millions of women have had their female babies butchered.

More hyperbolic rhetoric. Besides, forced abortions violate the principle of pro-choice, something you obviously don't understand.

This is called "barbaric" by proabortionists and they are correct.

And again.

They simply don't apply their standards to women who have boys and girls butchered.

2. Roe v. Wade began with the lie that Norma McCorvey was raped. She perjured her testimony. It should be overturned based on perjured testimony.

Irrelevant even if it were true. Abortion pre-viability is a right to which all womb owners are entitled to.

3. "My body, my 'choice'."
Big, huge lie. That unique DNA is NOT the killer's body.

Wait a minute. Earlier you said that the ZEF's DNA was 50% the father (it's slightly less on average, but whatever). Slightly more than 50% comes from the mother.

Now you're saying that none of it is from the mother?

See, this is what happens when you lie. You struggle to keep your lies straight.

4. Many adults who are alive today survived botched abortions and they are very glad to have done so,

Many such stories are fabrications designed to brainwash children into falling for anti-choice rhetoric. Those that lie to children like that are abusing those children.

as are their temporarily insane mothers.

The number one reason that womb owners choose to abort is economics. But your side doesn't want to address that problem. Nor do you want the very comprehensive sex ed taught that would prevent people from getting accidentally knocked up. You people are pro-forced-birth, not "prolife." See my sig #1.

5. Draw a line, left to right. Label the left origin "conception" and the right end "full term delivery" at 9 months on this time line. Now draw a vertical line somewhere through the horizontal line where YOU contend that on the left side, this human can be slaughtered, but one second later, it cannot. Justify your absurd claim with science, and logic.
(You cannot.)

You don't get to decide where viability is. That's not your decision for anyone if you don't have a womb. If you don't like abortions, don't have intercourse, and encourage (other) cis men to do the same.

 

[Peter King]

1. I have reported your offensive and childish post. The authorities of this site may not choose to ban you, but they should.

You mean factual and correct? It was not offensive or childish. Saying that a post/opinion is trash/lies/idiocy is not being offensive to someone (which would be violating the rules of our forum) and even then banning someone for this is not going to happen even if that had happened.

2. None of us have to "deal with" anyone who is murdered. You don't seem to care in the least about anyone who is murdered because you don't have to "deal with" those killed. You have no compassion, no conscience whatever.

More nonsense, abortion has nothing to do with murder. Pure and simple. And nobody has to deal with "those aborted" as they are existed.

3. I created a website pointing out injustices of many murders of whites by blacks - not that you care or have to "deal with" any of them.

White Lives Don't Matter

whitelivesdontmatter.blogspot.com

This is the abortion thread, if you want to discuss that nonsensical view in another sub-section of this forum,

 

[Peter King]

Even the title of the thread is absolute nonsense, we are pro-choice advocates, not "abortion supporters" as it is none of our business what a woman decides about HER body. You can be against abortion and still support freedom to choose as it is not our right to decide what a woman decides about her own body, regardless of what we personally think.

 

[calamity]

1. It's a woman's right to "choose". Big lie.
A. It's not her body she is having butchered. It's a new, unique human being, with half the DNA of its father.
B. Fathers should have a choice. Proabortionists deny them their choice to have and hold and raise their child. Fathers may have to pay child support for 18 years, and they certainly have no "choice" there either.
C. In China, tens of millions of women have had their female babies butchered. This is called "barbaric" by proabortionists and they are correct. They simply don't apply their standards to women who have boys and girls butchered.

2. Roe v. Wade began with the lie that Norma McCorvey was raped. She perjured her testimony. It should be overturned based on perjured testimony.

3. "My body, my 'choice'."
Big, huge lie. That unique DNA is NOT the killer's body.

4. Many adults who are alive today survived botched abortions and they are very glad to have done so, as are their temporarily insane mothers.

5. Draw a line, left to right. Label the left origin "conception" and the right end "full term delivery" at 9 months on this time line. Now draw a vertical line somewhere through the horizontal line where YOU contend that on the left side, this human can be slaughtered, but one second later, it cannot. Justify your absurd claim with science, and logic.
(You cannot.)

I disagree.

 

[HIP56948]

Most people on the left have observed that the noisiest Anti-woman's rights groups are also the noisiest ones who would refuse a single mother any help at all (through no fault of her own) ....if she was absolutely destitute and sleeping under a bridge. You know what the bottom line is? Money, money, money. "I'm not paying someone who can't..blah..blah..blah"
BUT, they WILL give their monies to charlatans and filthy rich con men and TV preachers. No problem. Greed..pure greed.

 

[RaleBulgarian]

1. I have reported your offensive and childish post. The authorities of this site may not choose to ban you, but they should.
2. None of us have to "deal with" anyone who is murdered. You don't seem to care in the least about anyone who is murdered because you don't have to "deal with" those killed. You have no compassion, no conscience whatever.
3. I created a website pointing out injustices of many murders of whites by blacks - not that you care or have to "deal with" any of them.

White Lives Don't Matter

whitelivesdontmatter.blogspot.com

1. Yours was the offensive and childish post.
2. Abortion isn’t murder. Simple fact.
3. I have reported you for violating forum rules.

Spamming - What constitutes spamming can be, but is not limited to, "A message (typically an advertisement) sent indiscriminately to a wide set of discussion lists [forums] or newsgroups."[google] Also, any message or series of messages promoting a product, site or service made by a member who does not demonstrate the intention and willingness to participate in the normal discourse of the DPMB can be considered spamming. Spamming and/or spam bots will not be tolerated and can result in immediate banning of the spammer.

 

[Dragonfly]

1. I have reported your offensive and childish post.

 

[MrWonderful]

An Italian woman was advised by her obstetrician to have her unborn son aborted. He would be born with grave medical defects.

As a loving mother, she wanted her baby and had him. His name: Andrea Bocelli.

Stopping a beating heart isn't "murder"? In what world do you live.
Your fanatics have proposed laws to legalize murdering babies born alive when their abortions are botched. Your fanatics have proposed legalizing the murder of children until they are two years old.

 

[MrWonderful]

Most people on the left have observed that the noisiest Anti-woman's rights groups are also the noisiest ones who would refuse a single mother any help at all (through no fault of her own) ....if she was absolutely destitute and sleeping under a bridge. You know what the bottom line is? Money, money, money. "I'm not paying someone who can't..blah..blah..blah"
BUT, they WILL give their monies to charlatans and filthy rich con men and TV preachers. No problem. Greed..pure greed.

The greed is on the Left. Read Who Really Cares by Arthur C. Brooks. Leftists, atheists, and liberals don't really care. They preach big government and posture their "generosity" which is absent.
Leftists give less to their families, to their charities, less of their time and less blood.
All talk, all lies. Take Biden and his crooked, coke-smoking, prostitute riddled son, please.

 

[calamity]

The greed is on the Left. Read Who Really Cares by Arthur C. Brooks. Leftists, atheists, and liberals don't really care. They preach big government and posture their "generosity" which is absent.
Leftists give less to their families, to their charities, less of their time and less blood.
All talk, all lies. Take Biden and his crooked, coke-smoking, prostitute riddled son, please.

Gee, that wasn't a poorly thought out, idiotic partisan rant at all.

 

[RaleBulgarian]

Your fanatics have proposed laws to legalize murdering babies born alive when their abortions are botched.

Flat out lie.

 

[MrWonderful]

Flat out lie.

Governor VETOES "Born Alive Bill":

North Carolina governor vetoes 'born alive' abortion bill | CNN

North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper on Thursday vetoed a bill that would have required doctors to try to preserve the life of any infant born alive during an attempted abortion.

www.cnn.com

You are the liar, the malicious, hateful liar.

 

[RaleBulgarian]

Governor VETOES "Born Alive Bill":

North Carolina governor vetoes 'born alive' abortion bill | CNN

North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper on Thursday vetoed a bill that would have required doctors to try to preserve the life of any infant born alive during an attempted abortion.

www.cnn.com

You are the liar, the malicious, hateful liar.

Taken from your citation;In a letter announcing his veto, Cooper, a Democrat, wrote that laws “already protect newborn babies, and this bill is an unnecessary interference between doctors and their parents.”

https://www.congress.gov/107/plaws/publ207/PLAW-107publ207.pdf

The despicable Republican bill, had Cooper not done the right thing by vetoing, would have stripped away the parent’s right to decide what care should be given their baby and forced doctors, under penalty of law, to be accomplices in that violation of a parent’s fundamental rights.

* Also, I have reported you for calling me “a liar”, repeatedly. A clear violation of forum rules (flaming/baiting/trolling).

“More recently flame has come to refer to "any kind of derogatory comment no matter how witless or crude."[google] In a forum with sensitive topics such as this, derogatory flaming is bound to happen. Common sense will prevail, yet this is not an invitation to flame. e.g. "You stupid *****ing moron," is completely unacceptable and could lead to a suspension of posting privileges.

 

[Scrabaholic]

1. It's a woman's right to "choose". Big lie.
A. It's not her body she is having butchered. It's a new, unique human being, with half the DNA of its father.
B. Fathers should have a choice. Proabortionists deny them their choice to have and hold and raise their child. Fathers may have to pay child support for 18 years, and they certainly have no "choice" there either.
C. In China, tens of millions of women have had their female babies butchered. This is called "barbaric" by proabortionists and they are correct. They simply don't apply their standards to women who have boys and girls butchered.

2. Roe v. Wade began with the lie that Norma McCorvey was raped. She perjured her testimony. It should be overturned based on perjured testimony.

3. "My body, my 'choice'."
Big, huge lie. That unique DNA is NOT the killer's body.

4. Many adults who are alive today survived botched abortions and they are very glad to have done so, as are their temporarily insane mothers.

5. Draw a line, left to right. Label the left origin "conception" and the right end "full term delivery" at 9 months on this time line. Now draw a vertical line somewhere through the horizontal line where YOU contend that on the left side, this human can be slaughtered, but one second later, it cannot. Justify your absurd claim with science, and logic.
(You cannot.)

Another one without a uterus wanting to dictate to those of us with one what we can or cannot do with the contents of ours. Do let us know when your body will suffer the ravages of gestation and delivery, k?

 

[nota bene]

“More recently flame has come to refer to "any kind of derogatory comment no matter how witless or crude."[google] In a forum with sensitive topics such as this, derogatory flaming is bound to happen. Common sense will prevail, yet this is not an invitation to flame. e.g. "You stupid *****ing moron," is completely unacceptable and could lead to a suspension of posting privileges.

Moderator's Warning:

Stop trying to play mod.

 

[nota bene]

Shocking...another DUDE posting trash, lies, and idiocy regarding something medical he'll never have to directly deal with.

I hope you aren't suggesting that only CHICKS are entitled to an opinion in this forum.

But hey, if you want to limit who's allowed to offer an opinion in this forum, why should women who have never been pregnant and never will be have a right to an opinion? Why should any woman who hasn't had an abortion be entitled to one?

What you've characterized as "trash, lies, and idiocy" is obviously contrary to your viewpoint, but there is no reason to say that someone whose opinion differs from yours is lying. Just a little bit of respect for those whose viewpoints you oppose would go a long way toward a civil discussion.

And if your "come-back" is that someone who doesn't see things the way you do doesn't deserve respect, I'll say "Be better."

 

[tosca1]

An Italian woman was advised by her obstetrician to have her unborn son aborted. He would be born with grave medical defects.

As a loving mother, she wanted her baby and had him. His name: Andrea Bocelli.

Stopping a beating heart isn't "murder"? In what world do you live.
Your fanatics have proposed laws to legalize murdering babies born alive when their abortions are botched. Your fanatics have proposed legalizing the murder of children until they are two years old.

Wow. Andrea Bocelli. Thanks for that info.

 

[Jason Warfield]

An Italian woman was advised by her obstetrician to have her unborn son aborted. He would be born with grave medical defects.

As a loving mother, she wanted her baby and had him. His name: Andrea Bocelli.

Stopping a beating heart isn't "murder"? In what world do you live.
Your fanatics have proposed laws to legalize murdering babies born alive when their abortions are botched. Your fanatics have proposed legalizing the murder of children until they are two years old.

In 2012, a woman suffering from a miscarriage at 17 weeks could not have the fetus aborted due to Ireland’s abortion laws. Once they were certain the fetus was dead they performed the abortion.

And the mother died Andre hours later because of the resulting blood poisoning that resulted in waiting three days to be sure the fetus was dead.

You can google the sad affair and read about it yourself should you chose to. But the question remains…do you believe it is moral to put the mother in physical danger to save the fetus no matter what? And if so, would it not be murder to force that situation on the mother as it was not her fault and out of her control?

Now, if you are okay with abortions performed to save the mother but feel it is murder otherwise, please make it clear to us why it isn’t murder.

Now, if you want to talk about Bocelli, it should be noted that while true his mother refused the abortion, he wa not born blind bit did have poor eyesight which he lost in a socce game when he was 11.

Also, it should be noted that his family had the financial means to take care of him; so many families do not and let us be honest…you are likely against providing government assistance to those in that situation.

Look, you wish to be against abortion and peach it to anyone will listen? Then, by God, do it! But you don’t get to dictate laws on the subject. You don’t get to impose your opinion on others in the form of laws.

Worry about you and yours; not the rest of us as you do not have that legal right to do so.

 

[RaleBulgarian]

Moderator's Warning:

Stop trying to play mod.

Many apologies. I would never presume to possess the requisite wisdom or maturity to do your job.

My deep dislike of lies, disdain for those that tell them, and disgust of hypocrisy caused me to momentarily forget my place.

It won’t happen again.

 

[Patriotic Voter]

I stopped reading at the end of the first line. A woman's right to choose abortion is extremely obvious in the United States Constitution. Everyone who graduated from high school knows it.

 

[KingDavid]

It's all about viability and that has changed recently. I believe abortions should be legal, safe and rare, like Mrs. Clinton said...