To say that Donald Trump's dishonest behavior is a disappointment would be a bit of an understatement, because his dishonesty, combined with those in the GOP who will jump on a hand grenade for him may very well be making conservatism toxic for a generation. But one can defend the underlying actions themselves while condemning the lies he used to justify them.
Let me draw a hypothetical for you, bongsaway. I do not know your particular policy desires as a self-described progressive, but let us say for the sake of argument Elizabeth Warren wins the presidency, and let us say she pursues a progressive agenda. Your dream agenda. Picture it in your head for a moment, the top three most important things to you, whether healthcare legislation, education legislation, progressive judicial appointments, gun control legislation, etc. Imagine that she pursues them and manages to get them passed into law and implemented.
But imagine then, for the sake of argument, that all while doing this she begins making up lies and hyperboles while onstage, and to the face of the American people, and in pursuit of her goals. And I do not mean little fibs or half-truths or statements that are open to interpretation. I mean naked, bald-faced lies that no intellectually honest person can defend. Lies that make you so embarrassed, you want to just crawl out of your skin. Trumpian lies. Lies that are such that when you are confronted by fellow citizens, not necessarily Trump supporters who you can dismiss or call out for hypocrisy, but every day neutral Americans, you cannot muster the mental or emotional strength or fortitude to defend.
What would you have done for the hypothetical lying politician who passed your dream agenda that you believe benefitted most Americans? Would you want her censured by her fellow Democrats in Congress, or perhaps even impeached? Because no matter how good someone's policies are, the American people already had to deal with one undignified liar in the Oval Office, we should not have to deal with a second one? Or should she remain on the basis of her good works, irrespective of her dishonesty?