- Joined
- Feb 26, 2012
- Messages
- 56,981
- Reaction score
- 27,029
- Location
- Chicago Illinois
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Private
The only virtues the republicans push are jesus values, which always come at a major cost for someone, especially for gays and casual drug users.
The only virtue we need is to avoid violating someone else's rights, and for that we have laws.
Marrying your gay lover or smoking a joint is not violating anyones rights.
That's why not all of us believe in Rights, but rather in Privileges.
Virtues are dangerous as vices insofar as they are allowed to rule over one as authorities and not as qualities one develops oneself.
Friedrich Nietzsche
We need more Fred and less Jesus in our society.
it would make things more interesting, but we do have plenty already who misinterprete the former just as much as we do with the latter...
Marrying your gay lover or smoking a joint is not violating anyones rights.
Rand Paul clearly is seeking to move the GOP in a more libertarian direction. Most recently, he has called for changes to "cookie cutter conservatism," referencing a change in the party's position on drugs (for one example) as a way to attract more young people to the GOP (Sen. Rand Paul on top congressional issues; pivotal moment in the battle over gay marriage | Interviews | Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace - Fox News).
In theory, libertarian principles often sound great, especially when you're young. After all, it sounds pretty good to announce that the government should just stay out of everbody's business.
No, talking about things like "civic virtue" isn't nearly as hip as signaling support for less stringent penalties for some kinds of drug use. But it's necessary both because intellectual honesty requirks it and also because liberty without virtue quickly devolves into licentiousness -- and carries the risk of justifying creation of a bigger-than-ever-before government to pick up the pieces.....snip~
Libertarian or Licentious? - Carol Platt Liebau
So are Libertarians ready to talk about the kind of virtues necessary to support the freedoms they espouse? Thoughts?
Don't we have laws? Aren't we advancing the marijuana legalization and homosexual civil rights to state marriages? This isn't new. This is Rand jumping on the bandwagon because he's tired of his party losing to democrats.
To be fair, Nietzsche never insisted that there was a 'correct' interpretation of his works, and I think his perspectivist epistemology would have denied the very possibility of it.
I like reading existentialist Nietzscheans, but I think they largely get him wrong. Post-modernist Nietzscheans are probably closer to his "actual meaning" but are much less entertaining to read. And the less said about right-wing 'Nietzscheans', the better.
So, for example, if everybody wants to legalize drugs, just keep in mind that, without fundamental reform of our social safety net first, taxpayers will end up subsidizing those who become unable to hold jobs because of addiction. Likewise, it's easy to insist that government get out of the "marriage business," but there's little prospect that doing so will mean that the government will also get out of the "business" of having to care for the offspring of unmarried parents (who truly are, too often, the victims of their parents' terrible decisions).....snip~
Not quite.....whats wrong about talking about exactly what those virtues stand for? Why would Rand Paul be wrong for talking about virtues and being able to reach out to people of all demographics? But even moreso the Libertarian.
So, for example, if everybody wants to legalize drugs, just keep in mind that, without fundamental reform of our social safety net first, taxpayers will end up subsidizing those who become unable to hold jobs because of addiction. Likewise, it's easy to insist that government get out of the "marriage business," but there's little prospect that doing so will mean that the government will also get out of the "business" of having to care for the offspring of unmarried parents (who truly are, too often, the victims of their parents' terrible decisions).....snip~
Not quite.....whats wrong about talking about exactly what those virtues stand for? Why would Rand Paul be wrong for talking about virtues and being able to reach out to people of all demographics? But even moreso the Libertarian.
en. Rand Paul (R-Tenn.) spoke in more detail about his position on marijuana on "Fox News Sunday." He does not support legalization, but believes marijuana users should not be sent to prison.
"The main thing I've said is not to legalize them but not to incarcerate people for extended periods of time," Paul said.
Due to drug laws, Paul complained, there are too many non-violent criminals filling up prisons.
"There are people in jail for 37, 50, 45 years for nonviolent crimes. And that's a huge mistake. Our prisons are full of nonviolent criminals," Paul said.
Paul describes himself as a libertarian conservative, but unlike many libertarians, does not support the full legalization of marijuana. In a November 2012 interview, Paul also said he would support allowing each state to decide the issue.
Read more at Rand Paul Clarifies Marijuana Position: Don't Legalize, but Reduce Sentencing
You're assuming that decriminalizing drugs would mean more people being addicted ... except empirically (based on places that have decriminalized drugs), that simply isn't the case.
In any event more users means more addiction.....does it not? But Rand Paul really doesn't think it is a good idea that people smoke Marijuana. Which in discussing such an issue he thinks that virtues would be a counter to drug use. But he is against the government locking nonviolent offenders up for long periods of time and over drug use.
That government should be neutral over the issue of Marriage.....I don't see why the Government needs to be involved in that issue. It has always been a state issue.
In any event more users means more addiction.....does it not? But Rand Paul really doesn't think it is a good idea that people smoke Marijuana. Which in discussing such an issue he thinks that virtues would be a counter to drug use. But he is against the government locking nonviolent offenders up for long periods of time and over drug use.
That government should be neutral over the issue of Marriage.....I don't see why the Government needs to be involved in that issue. It has always been a state issue.
In any event more users means more addiction.....does it not? But Rand Paul really doesn't think it is a good idea that people smoke Marijuana. Which in discussing such an issue he thinks that virtues would be a counter to drug use. But he is against the government locking nonviolent offenders up for long periods of time and over drug use.
That government should be neutral over the issue of Marriage.....I don't see why the Government needs to be involved in that issue. It has always been a state issue.
Thoughts?
Because states violate human rights. NOT allowing slaves to marry, then not allowing interracial couples to marry and now not allowing gay couples to marry. Some states violate civil rights which means court cases travel to the Supreme Court where they are then decided on a national policy for the country based on constitutional civil rights.
Did the stopping of the prohibition of alcohol mean more alcoholics?
How does it become the governments Right to provide a social safety net in the first place? It's not the government that instills virtues. Any freedom means suffering the consequences for those that make bad decisions.
It becomes the governments right when we democratically decide that that entity will take care of that service that benefits all of society and is the moral thing to do.¨
The right of social security is as fundemental philisophically as the right to property, if we can collectively say that the state will protect private porperty, and create private corporations and protect them legally, then we can colelctively say the state provides social security.
Any freedom means suffering consequences for bad actions, but that isn't what capitalism is about, capitalism is about externalities, putting the bad consequences on OTHER people while keeping all the profits.
There's no such thing as civic virtue, unless you are a fundamentalist statist espousing a modified humanist philosophy; which unfortunately pretty much leaves out God. Our virtues historically cames from religion and faith.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?