If you are going to continue to deny the truth please list any natural function of homosexual sex.
Go right ahead.
Now you are simply lying about what I said.
I already did. The establishment of bonds between primates of the same species, gender tribes etc. The fact that this is natural function is established by studies done on some of our closest relatives in the animal world. Try reading?
And you are lying about there not being any other natural functions of homosexual sex. :shrug:
I did and nothing in there is a claim of nature. Try reading the difference between nature and culture.
Then name them. Put up or shut up.
You refuse to go point for point and you have the gall to call me dishonest? Take a good look in the mirror Redress.
Ah the last refuge of the defeated. And of course you can't even quote what you claim I "took out of context"
Your dishonesty really knows no bounds does it?
Proclaiming victory without even addressing the specific points is a sure sign of defeat.
While you duck going point for point like a real debator.
Wrong. Once again I point to your own post:
So which is it Redress? Which face am I addressing again?
Once of those being MARRIED to another woman according to YOUR OWN POST.
Once again I must embarass you and look at the law behind this:
That the member has married or attempted to marry a person known to be of the same biological sex.
US CODE: Title 10,654. Policy concerning homosexuality in the armed forces
How are you going to try wiggle out of it this time?
Just in case you missed it for the 5th time, it states:
That the member has married or attempted to marry a person known to be of the same biological sex
And once more:
That the member has married or attempted to marry a person known to be of the same biological sex
Are you done now? Or are you going to continue to pretend that you haven't said it despite me quoting you and now being confronted by yet another source informing you once again how painfully wrong you are.
US CODE: Title 10,654. Policy concerning homosexuality in the armed forces
This truly is like watching a sinking ship with the captain still claiming nothing is wrong. Its painful and amusing to watch at the same time.
A member of the armed forces shall be separated from the armed forces under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense if one or more of the following findings is made
I did and nothing in there is a claim of nature. Try reading the difference between nature and culture.
Then name them. Put up or shut up.
A question for all of you attacking tex... if heterosexuality is not genetically predisposed, what are your alternate theories for why something like 99.9% of all eukaryotic organisms engage in this activity?
I'm asking for alternate theories for the preponderance of heterosexuality. Got any?because its how they reproduce, just because it's necessary doesn't make it genetic.
A question for all of you attacking tex... if heterosexuality is not genetically predisposed, what are your alternate theories for why something like 99.9% of all eukaryotic organisms engage in this activity?
I'm asking for alternate theories for the preponderance of heterosexuality. If not genetically predisposed, then what brings it about?Because there's a difference between activity and genetic inherited traits?
Yeah, most stuff that occurs in nature is not natural....
I would strongly recomment doing some reading on evolution(Hrdy is a favorite)Amazon.com: Sarah Blaffer Hrdy: Books, Biography, Blog, Audiobooks, Kindle, and some on genetics. You might not get so confused in the future.
So you have nothing to support your BS claims on an equal comparison. Next time just say so.
I'm asking for alternate theories for the preponderance of heterosexuality. If not genetically predisposed, then what brings it about?
Not claiming that they are.The fact that is is how we reproduce. I guess the same process brought that about that brought about the fact that we eliminate waste by pissing: it's just a fact of nature.
Physiology and genetics are not the same thing.
I'm asking for alternate theories for the preponderance of heterosexuality. If not genetically predisposed, then what brings it about?
Not claiming that they are.
So your best answer is "the same process" we use to deficate? Do you have any guesses as to what this mysterious process might be?
My bad.First, I didn't say deficate. I said urinate. But same thing.
Is that a guess or do we in fact have proof that heterosexuality arises during the embryonic phase of development, regardless of genetics?The process is embryonic development.
This is almost embarrassing. It's like you do not ever comprehend what is written, and just look for ways to bolster your claim, instead of looking at facts. I will slow this down even more for you, maybe, just maybe you will comprehend, though I doubt it.
Being discharged under DADT is not punishment. There is no trial, no NJP, no court marshal involved. It is purely administrative. Even your own link says this:
This is something no one has argued. I pointed it out early on, and added detail. So yes, unless misconduct is discovered(which it was not in this case), the discharge is entry level or honorable, yes the discharged person retains veterans benefits, yes, if over 6 years served they get separation pay.
Repeating something that no one is arguing time and again does not mean your point in other areas is right.
My bad.
Is that a guess or do we in fact have proof that heterosexuality arises during the embryonic phase of development, regardless of genetics?
I've already asked you to go point for point like a real debater.
I'm asking for alternate theories for the preponderance of heterosexuality. Got any?
So you have nothing to support your BS claims on an equal comparison. Next time just say so.
I've already asked you to go point for point like a real debater.
You are the one who claimed she broke no law then I had to read the power of regulation and law. I have looked up the regulation, posted it, looked up your own words and posted them and you don't even have the honesty of going point for point and instead favor summaries claiming I've taken you out of context but don't even have the courage to point out the specific areas where you claim this.
When you can be honest enough to address each point and defend your direct quotes, let me know.
what right did the police have to pass on that information?Nothing about police misconduct here. The issue is DADT. The military didn't ask, and she didn't tell.
total bull****. the police had no right whatsoever to relay that information. and the military should never LOOK for that info, under current rules. you're off base here.Sorry, she did not keep it at home. She notified the government of her intentions by obtaining a legal marriage license. There is no wiggle room here. If she was just living with her, ok thats a much harder case to make but a marriage license? Please.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?