- Joined
- Oct 18, 2007
- Messages
- 32,061
- Reaction score
- 21,046
- Location
- East Coast - USA
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
[FONT="]and to find scarves to tie over the eyes of their sons to protect them from you![/FONT]
:allhail:allhail:allhail:allhail
All hail plankton!
I prefer most munificent lord and master of humanity, ruler of all I survey, Grand Regent of Man caves, Imperial hand of creation, defender of the sacred virgins ( not so much anymore), liberator of pilfered Little debbies, and conqueror of the mysteries of ladies medicine cabinets.
But, you can call me Bob.
I prefer most munificent lord and master of humanity, ruler of all I survey, Grand Regent of Man caves, Imperial hand of creation, defender of the sacred virgins ( not so much anymore), liberator of pilfered Little debbies, and conqueror of the mysteries of ladies medicine cabinets.
But, you can call me Bob.
This has been in the news, so here's the letter from the Catholic mother of four boys:
The legging problem // The Observer
Our Catholic sons need to be protected from girls wearing leggings. :lamo
And the awesome response:
She told them leggings were too suggestive, so they wore them in protest - CNN
ALL HAIL WOMEN IN LEGGINGS!!!!!
This has been in the news, so here's the letter from the Catholic mother of four boys:
The legging problem // The Observer
Our Catholic sons need to be protected from girls wearing leggings. :lamo
And the awesome response:
She told them leggings were too suggestive, so they wore them in protest - CNN
ALL HAIL WOMEN IN LEGGINGS!!!!!
Of course, it is easy to just turn this article into a joke and laugh at it, but I actually think the author makes some valid points and adds asome valid micro-critic to a socio-cultural problem that if of a larger, macro-size - Oversexualisation, promiscuity and the decline of self-respect.
I prefer most munificent lord and master of humanity, ruler of all I survey, Grand Regent of Man caves, Imperial hand of creation, defender of the sacred virgins ( not so much anymore), liberator of pilfered Little debbies, and conqueror of the mysteries of ladies medicine cabinets.
But, you can call me Bob.
Where did I ever suggest that personal choice of clothing should be dictated from "top-to-down"?Or.....you can just let people wear what they choose and get on with your own life as it does not affect anyone except in their own minds.
But, Im kinda radical like that.
I actually think the author makes some valid points
Well, there are mainly three quotes in her article that, according to me, highlights a very important issue in contemporary society and those are;Care to list a few?
Well, there are mainly three quotes in her article that, according to me, highlights a very important issue in contemporary society and those are;
1. "[We live in a]world in which women continue to be depicted as “babes” by movies, video games, music videos[.]"
2. "[W]omen should be viewed first as people — and all people should be considered with respect."
3. "But I wonder why no one thinks it’s strange that the fashion industry has caused women to voluntarily expose their nether regions in this way."
I would trace these issues back to the Sexual Revolution that was supposed to "liberate the female sexuality", but which instead turned out to do the very opposite and female sexuality has now become so inflated that it is, literally, not worth more than a swipe of the finger against a screen.
And this is connected to my post in what way exactly?1) We live in a world where women can be elected as leaders of their country.
I guess it depends on your definition of "peoplehood". The author's argument is not that women are not regarded as people, she is only raising the question about over-sexualisation and objectification.2) Where is it (in the western world) that women are viewed as something besides people?
It does cause them to be "fashionable" and "fashionable" is not always synonymous to self-respecting.3) How does the fashion industry "cause" women to do anything?
And this is connected to my post in what way exactly?
I guess it depends on your definition of "peoplehood". The author's argument is not that women are not regarded as people, she is only raising the question about over-sexualisation and objectification.
It does cause them to be "fashionable" and "fashionable" is not always synonymous to self-respecting.
And this relates to my post in what way exactly?People will often times see the world in the way they wish to see it.
Her overall point is indeed a bit pathetic, but - as I pointed out in previous post - she does lift some interesting points and it is mainly those that I decided to pick out and focus on.The author doesn't give a fig about women. She's concerned about her poor boys. That's part of what's so funny and sad about her ridiculous rant.
Where did I say that? I am not biting this red herring you are trying to serve to me.Women can't make choices on their own? They're robots who only buy the things the industry tells them to buy?
Where is the citation supporting that I ever suggested that to be the case?Who decided that ladies that wear leggings have lost their self-respect? Where's the data to support that?
That is why I said that her micro-criticism highlights something that is part of a broader macro-issue, namely over-sexualisation, the normalisation of promiscuity that comes with it and the inflation of female beauty, degrading the woman to nothing but an object.And again, the author isn't writing anything regarding her concern for ladies.
Her issue is SHE doesn't like it, and that her poor poor sons must be having great difficulty dealing with it.
She is saying that her sons are victims, and that she is too.
This has been in the news, so here's the letter from the Catholic mother of four boys:
The legging problem // The Observer
Our Catholic sons need to be protected from girls wearing leggings. :lamo
And the awesome response:
She told them leggings were too suggestive, so they wore them in protest - CNN
ALL HAIL WOMEN IN LEGGINGS!!!!!
This has been in the news, so here's the letter from the Catholic mother of four boys:
The legging problem // The Observer
Our Catholic sons need to be protected from girls wearing leggings. :lamo
And the awesome response:
She told them leggings were too suggestive, so they wore them in protest - CNN
ALL HAIL WOMEN IN LEGGINGS!!!!!
Or.....you can just let people wear what they choose and get on with your own life as it does not affect anyone except in their own minds.
But, Im kinda radical like that.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?