So yes you are a dangerous person and an admitted threat. hence why you get treated as such.
No s***!
LA Times says conservative white men worse than terrorists, monitoring needed - Spokane Conservative | Examiner.com
According to an op-ed at the Los Angeles Times, conservative white men who support the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms are worse than international terrorists and need to be monitored by the federal government, Infowars reported Wednesday.
The op-ed, written after the Southern Poverty Law Center demanded the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security "crack down on Americans expressing opposition to an increasingly tyrannical federal government," claims there are "cells of angry men in the United States preparing for combat with the U.S. government."
"They are usually heavily armed, blinded by an intractable hatred, often motivated by religious zeal," the Times wrote.
Kurt Nimmo accused the paper of racism for singling out white men as the culprit that needs to be dealt with by the federal government.
"They are white, right-wing Americans, nearly all with an obsessive attachment to guns, who may represent a greater danger to the lives of American civilians than international terrorists," the Times said.
I like this part from the Times:
But you're all up in arms over "disarming the poor" who obviously shouldn't be spending their money on guns. I mean, since our concern is because of the cost of weapons princing them out...
Who are you to decide what the poor should spend their money on? So in your mind putting guns out of economic reach is for their own good.
No s***!
LA Times says conservative white men worse than terrorists, monitoring needed - Spokane Conservative | Examiner.com
According to an op-ed at the Los Angeles Times, conservative white men who support the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms are worse than international terrorists and need to be monitored by the federal government, Infowars reported Wednesday.
The op-ed, written after the Southern Poverty Law Center demanded the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security "crack down on Americans expressing opposition to an increasingly tyrannical federal government," claims there are "cells of angry men in the United States preparing for combat with the U.S. government."
"They are usually heavily armed, blinded by an intractable hatred, often motivated by religious zeal," the Times wrote.
Kurt Nimmo accused the paper of racism for singling out white men as the culprit that needs to be dealt with by the federal government.
"They are white, right-wing Americans, nearly all with an obsessive attachment to guns, who may represent a greater danger to the lives of American civilians than international terrorists," the Times said.
I like this part from the Times:
Who are you to decide what the poor should spend their money on? So in your mind putting guns out of economic reach is for their own good.
So, you're saying that you support outright racism and sexism? You would welcome a new version of Jim Crow that would target white males? Target American citizens because of their race, gender and political ideology?
You guys are pathetic. I never said i support or condone this type of behavior.
I said "I liked this part..." because he calls out the bigots on your side. He's spot on.
You agree with his opinion, but you don't condone such behavior? Really?...lol!
I agree with what the article says about conservatives being terrorist like.
I'll repost the article again for your clarification:
According to an op-ed at the Los Angeles Times, conservative white men who support the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms are worse than international terrorists and need to be monitored by the federal government, Infowars reported Wednesday.
The op-ed, written after the Southern Poverty Law Center demanded the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security "crack down on Americans expressing opposition to an increasingly tyrannical federal government," claims there are "cells of angry men in the United States preparing for combat with the U.S. government."
"They are usually heavily armed, blinded by an intractable hatred, often motivated by religious zeal," the Times wrote.
Kurt Nimmo accused the paper of racism for singling out white men as the culprit that needs to be dealt with by the federal government.
"They are white, right-wing Americans, nearly all with an obsessive attachment to guns, who may represent a greater danger to the lives of American civilians than international terrorists," the Times said.
and im back tacking on this remark that i said:
I never said i support or condone this type of behavior.
This was meant for another topic. Wrote it in the wrong thread
Gotta love internet tough guys :roll:
You are correct. What you quoted does not say that. But, what the OP quoted does.
I agree with what the article says about conservatives being terrorist like.
I'll repost the article again for your clarification:
According to an op-ed at the Los Angeles Times, conservative white men who support the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms are worse than international terrorists and need to be monitored by the federal government, Infowars reported Wednesday.
The op-ed, written after the Southern Poverty Law Center demanded the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security "crack down on Americans expressing opposition to an increasingly tyrannical federal government," claims there are "cells of angry men in the United States preparing for combat with the U.S. government."
"They are usually heavily armed, blinded by an intractable hatred, often motivated by religious zeal," the Times wrote.
Kurt Nimmo accused the paper of racism for singling out white men as the culprit that needs to be dealt with by the federal government.
"They are white, right-wing Americans, nearly all with an obsessive attachment to guns, who may represent a greater danger to the lives of American civilians than international terrorists," the Times said.
and im back tacking on this remark that i said:
I never said i support or condone this type of behavior.
This was meant for another topic. Wrote it in the wrong thread
I'm not from South Africa. I'm not going to sit back and do nothing, while Communists take over my country. Americans aren't cowards like that and it's one of the things that makes America the greatest nation in human history.
Ah there you go.
Asking someone "Why do you support Racist Policies"
Whilst at the same time maintaining that South Africa was better off under White Minority Rule.
Communists are not taking over your country.
Paranoia to the max, and this vein idea that you're some kind of manly man that fights for freedom and "I'm Dangerous" just makes you sound like an idiot because at the end of the day with Conservatives like you that can't tell the difference between crap and french fries, communism and socialism just amounts to in your universe "things I don't like".
I find it humorous that the cons are going batsht crazy over this op-ed piece.
It puts a smile on my face
Ah there you go.
Asking someone "Why do you support Racist Policies"
Whilst at the same time maintaining that South Africa was better off under White Minority Rule.
Communists are not taking over your country.
Paranoia to the max, and this vein idea that you're some kind of manly man that fights for freedom and "I'm Dangerous" just makes you sound like an idiot because at the end of the day with Conservatives like you that can't tell the difference between crap and french fries, communism and socialism just amounts to in your universe "things I don't like".
The only alternative to "white minority rule" was Communism?
SA is waaaaaaay better of now...not!
SPLC is a parasite organization that is a front for the creeping crud of communist malignancy
....... I'm not going to sit back and do nothing, while Communists take over my country. Americans aren't cowards like that and it's one of the things that makes America the greatest nation in human history.
Well South Africa isn't communist.
See this is why people think you're pretending to be black.
Because you think this:
Was better than this:
So, what you're basically saying is, since I don't buy into the bull****, there's no way I can be black?
Since you think gunning down black children is better than a representative democracy with a left leaning party in power...
I'd find it difficult to believe a black person would rather have South Africa under white minority rule that advocated shooting black children yes.
I never made any such comment. Don't put words into my mouth.
That's essentially what you're saying if you think South Africa should still be run by the apartheid government.
Because that's exactly what they did.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?