• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

La Familia Grows, Mexico's Drug War Flails

celticlord

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 10, 2009
Messages
6,344
Reaction score
3,794
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
WPR Article | La Familia Grows, Mexico's Drug War Flails

It's the summer of 2009, and Michoacan is in the spotlight once again. Since late May, federal authorities have conducted raids aimed at quelling La Familia's growing political clout, even rounding up 10 mayors and other civil servants in one cross-state sweep. The state governor's half-brother is believed not only to be linked to La Familia, but to be running part of the show. Dozens of high-ranking members of La Familia have been arrested, too -- but that has only spurred serious repercussions. In mid-July, for instance, 12 federal police officers were kidnapped and killed, prompting the deployment of 2,500 more soldiers to the central western state. In the ensuing weeks, dozens more members of La Familia have been nabbed, including Miguel Angel Berraza Villa, a.k.a., La Troca. The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration heralded the arrest of Berraza Villa and one of his associates as glowing proof of "the leadership and resolve of President Calderon and the Government of Mexico."

Perhaps, but the rapid, stealthy rise of La Familia is also proof that even if there is the will, there may not be a way. The war on drugs is failing. Michoacan, for the Calderon administration, was supposed to be the decisive first victory. Unlike Juarez and Culiacan, cities where the drug trade was so entrenched in society that few didn't a expect a years-long standoff between the feds and the narcos, Michoacan was a place where the authorities thought they could quickly wipe the slate clean. But instead, they somehow allowed La Familia to establish roots and grow -- right under their noses. "They were honestly surprised," says one U.S. counter-drug official, of the government's reaction to the recent show of force by La Familia.
What we call "cartels" in Mexico would be called clans and warlords in Somalia or Afghanistan.

Mexico seems to be drifting closer to becoming that failed state the Department of Defense feared earlier this year.
 
The war on drugs is failing.

Is failing? When was it ever not failing? Hell, it's doomed to failure.
 
Is failing? When was it ever not failing? Hell, it's doomed to failure.

Exactly. It was never successful. At any point. Much like our own.

Mexico's situation is exacerbated by a corrupt government (at many levels), low paid local police and military, and a lucrative alternative. Get paid well and live or get paid crap and have your head cut off. Not a hard choice.

Failed state coming sometime soon? I don't know if it's that bad. I could see a coup somewhere in the future. The cartels don't want to see infrastructure shut down. They simply want to control the industry and anything else that can make them money.
 
Last edited:
La Familia must be mexican for Taliban or Al Qaida or something.
 
At what point exactly is a country considered a "failed state"? When it falls into Anarchy?
When the government fails to assert control over its terroritory, allowing warlords, bandits, narco trafficantes and other associated meanies to wander around with impunity.

Mexico is not a failed state....yet. But the drug cartels are far from defeated, and, if this news article is an accurate picture, getting stronger, not weaker.
 
At what point exactly is a country considered a "failed state"? When it falls into Anarchy?
One definition:
Q: What does "state failure" mean?
A: A state that is failing has several attributes. One of the most common is the loss of physical control of its territory or a monopoly on the legitimate use of force. Other attributes of state failure include the erosion of legitimate authority to make collective decisions, an inability to provide reasonable public services, and the inability to interact with other states as a full member of the international community. The 12 indicators cover a wide range of elements of the risk of state failure, such as extensive corruption and criminal behavior, inability to collect taxes or otherwise draw on citizen support, large-scale involuntary dislocation of the population, sharp economic decline, group-based inequality, institutionalized persecution or discrimination, severe demographic pressures, brain drain, and environmental decay. States can fail at varying rates through explosion, implosion, erosion, or invasion over different time periods.

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2009/06/22/2009_failed_states_index_faq_methodology

 
Is failing? When was it ever not failing? Hell, it's doomed to failure.

Of course it is, as long as people are morons and use illicit drugs, and more morons make movies, music and talk about how drugs are not bad, it's a losing battle.

Personally I think they should just make Drugs legal, in one state, and let all the idiots of the country live there.
 
Of course it is, as long as people are morons and use illicit drugs, and more morons make movies, music and talk about how drugs are not bad, it's a losing battle.

Personally I think they should just make Drugs legal, in one state, and let all the idiots of the country live there.

As the stupid governments have to do is let people chose for themselves and stop busting people for drugs. Simply go after the ones at the very top who only wish to acquire power through selling the drugs on a massive scale.

It is the very root of the entire problem. It IS the only way to fix it. Everything else has been tried that isn't too radical.
 
Of course it is, as long as people are morons and use illicit drugs, and more morons make movies, music and talk about how drugs are not bad, it's a losing battle.

It's a losing battle because there is a demand that is not going away. Simple as that.
 
Of course it is, as long as people are morons and use illicit drugs, and more morons make movies, music and talk about how drugs are not bad, it's a losing battle.

Personally I think they should just make Drugs legal, in one state, and let all the idiots of the country live there.

In other words you think you can regulate personal vices and responsibility with guns, search warrants, and prison sentences.

Sure about that?
 
Back
Top Bottom