- Joined
- Jun 18, 2018
- Messages
- 80,335
- Reaction score
- 84,967
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
Khrushchev never once, not in a million years, thought Ukraine would ever be independent of the USSR, and his efforts in hunting down the fascists so admired by modern Ukraine likewise destroys your narrative....the Kremlin handed Crimea to Ukraine not out of benevolence but because a decade of disastrous Soviet policies had left the territory an economic and humanitarian disaster. As University of Cambridge professor Rory Finnin notes, “The transfer of Crimea to Ukraine was no mistake. It was a rescue.” During a visit to Crimea in October 1953, Khrushchev witnessed the devastation firsthand. Driving through the peninsula with his son-in-law, Aleksey Adzhubey — editor-in-chief of Izvestia and one of the Soviet Union’s most influential journalists — Khrushchev encountered not only the ruins of the Crimean Tatar Bakhchysaray Palace but also vast stretches of barren land strewn with abandoned military hardware.
Khrushchev understood that Crimea’s salvation depended on reconnecting it to Ukraine’s southern steppes and the life-giving Dnipro River, ties that had sustained the peninsula for millennia. ...First, the Presidium of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic passed a resolution proposing the transfer of Crimea to the Ukrainian SSR. Then the USSR’s central government — the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet — ratified the transfer on Feb.19, 1954, citing “the integral character of the economy, the territorial proximity, and the close economic and cultural ties between Crimea Province and the Ukrainian SSR.” Two months later, the Supreme Soviet amended the Soviet Constitution, officially transferring the Crimean Oblast from Russia to Ukraine. Ukraine’s Communist leadership, under pressure from Moscow, agreed to the transfer — along with the immense burden of reviving the devastated region.
Over the next decades, Ukraine poured resources into developing Crimea. In 1957, it launched the construction of the North Crimean Canal, completed in 1971, to bring water from the Dnipro River to the arid peninsula. Ukraine invested heavily in infrastructure, agriculture and tourism, building reservoirs, irrigating fields, establishing resorts and creating economic opportunities. Between 1954 and 1990, Ukraine invested close to five times more per capita in Crimea than in comparable regions elsewhere in the republic. These efforts bore fruit. By the time of Ukraine’s 1991 independence referendum, 54 percent of Crimean voters — including 57 percent in Sevastopol — chose to remain part of an independent Ukraine. A subsequent poll by Baltic Surveys/Gallup showed 65 percent of respondents favoring Crimea’s autonomy within Ukraine, with only 23 percent preferring union with Russia.
Link
Now you know the rest of the story.
Khrushchev never once, not in a million years, thought Ukraine would ever be independent of the USSR,..
And had he known what would happen, he never would have ceded Crimea to begin with.Well, he was wrong.
And had he known what would happen, he never would have ceded Crimea to begin with.
The article’s entire narrative is a falsehood.
Khrushchev never once, not in a million years, thought Ukraine would ever be independent of the USSR, and his efforts in hunting down the fascists so admired by modern Ukraine likewise destroys your narrative.
It’s very telling that even decades after Crimea’s supposed “rescue” , in the most optimistic time of any nation’s existence— new independence— almost half of the Crimean population still didn’t want to be a part of Ukraine.
And the strong secessionist sentiments that immediately emerged following independence only further demonstrate that point.
And there’s something pretty hilarious about celebrating Nazi collaborators as national heroes on one hand, and then turning around and trying to take credit for the hard work of loyal Ukrainian members of the USSR on the other, of course.
And had he known what would happen, he never would have ceded Crimea to begin with.
The article’s entire narrative is a falsehood.
Uh...what? The USSR absolutely could handle Crimea. It remained a huge Russian naval base for decades to come.Giving up Crimea because the Soviet Union couldn't handle it suggests Khrushchev had an idea the Soviet Union couldn't survive. They tried for decades to hold off the inevitable. Giving up Crimea was part of that effort.
Now they're supposed to get Crimea back because the Soviet Union failed?
Trump loves you, watsup. He hasn’t forgotten how you desperately defended Musk and his Nazi salute.Putin loves you.
Don’t worry watsup, your hero Trump still plans to annex Canada and Greenland in the name of fighting against Putin, undoubtedly to your delight.Putin still loves you.
Trump loves you, watsup. He hasn’t forgotten how you desperately defended Musk and his Nazi salute.
Don’t worry watsup, your hero Trump still plans to annex Canada and Greenland in the name of fighting against Putin, undoubtedly to your delight.
Still covering for Trump by desperately denying Musk gave a Nazi salute I see.Same old lie as always. It shows desperation.
Trump loves you, watsup. He admires your desperate efforts to defend him and Musk.Same old lies as always. It shows desperation.
Uh...what? The USSR absolutely could handle Crimea. It remained a huge Russian naval base for decades to come.
It was the Russian SSR— the local state government— which transferred Crimea to the Ukrainian SSR, another local state government. No different, really, than Michigan giving up Toledo to Ohio....except the Soviets weren’t shooting at each other over it, of course.
And given the fact the USSR only grew in strength throughout Khrushchev’s premiership— to the point where it could project power all the way into the Caribbean itself— your narrative is not supported by the facts on the ground.
The total lack of knowledge American apologists have about history is always amazing.
The Ukrainian SSR was part of the USSR dude. Your article literally goes into great detail talking about the Soviet Union succeeding in handling Crimea.Apparently the USSR could not handle Ukraine.
"Most telling were the desperate Russian settlers blocking the roads, pleading for water, sanitation, hospitals and schools. Soviet archives show that the entire region, roughly the size of Massachusetts, had only 24 bread stores, 18 meat stores, and eight milk stores."
Giving up Crimea because the Soviet Union couldn't handle it suggests Khrushchev had an idea the Soviet Union couldn't survive. They tried for decades to hold off the inevitable. Giving up Crimea was part of that effort.
Now they're supposed to get Crimea back because the Soviet Union failed?
Still covering for Trump by desperately denying Musk gave a Nazi salute I see.
Or have you finally worked up the courage to admit that’s precisely what he did?
Trump loves you, watsup. He admires your desperate efforts to defend him and Musk.
So no, you haven’t faced the truth.Such childish lying posts.
And had he known what would happen, he never would have ceded Crimea to begin with.
The article’s entire narrative is a falsehood.
The fact of the matter is it was all dirty politics. And at the time the Ukrainian Bolsheviks did not consider it a gift at all. To them it was more like a poisoned chalice. The Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic was much more homogenously ethnic Ukrainian than after Khruschev's Crimea gift; and up to them Russia SSR should have kept Crimea. The likes of Khruschev, Brezhnev were actually Ukrainian Bolsheviks of Russian ethnicity; they were a minority; adding Crimea- full of Russians- to Ukraine SSR increased the political clout of Russians there
another garbage post . Khrushchev initiated illegal land transfer just because he wants to award his native republic at the expense of Russia. Nothing prevented him to organise restoration of Crimea without any unnecessary “gifts” ....the Kremlin handed Crimea to Ukraine not out of benevolence but because a decade of disastrous Soviet policies had left the territory an economic and humanitarian disaster.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?